• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Promit

OpenGL
OpenGL and Mac: No D3D11 level functionality?

13 posts in this topic

Okay, can someone just straighten this out for me clearly? Apple publishes a table of GL version and extension support. This table shows that only version 3.2 is supported, and the extensions aren't anything to write home about.

 

Is this a joke?

 

I don't have a recent Mac at hand to test with. Apple systems really can't do ANY 11 level stuff? That doesn't make sense to me. 3.2 is coming up on 4 years old now... I'm not seeing anything to contradict this state of affairs, but I am having trouble wrapping my head around it.

Edited by Promit
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a joke?

It is not a joke and is accurate.
Even iOS devices will soon be more advanced and feature-rich than Mac OS X.


L. Spiro
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe at least some portion of the new functionality is probably available through OpenGL extensions... though I might be wrong about that. But yeah, the state of OpenGL sucks on mac.

 

Edit: oops, I guess not much after seeing that 10.8 OpenGL profile...

Edited by Aressera
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually this was one of the greatest dissapointments for me after buying a MBP. Before buying I just looked at the hardware and not into further details about drivers :( 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also you should be aware that not all features are implemented in hardware, even if they can be. So my MBA 2011 can do geometry shaders in hardware on Windows Bootcamp, but on OS X they run 20x slower and the CPU utilization goes to max on one core - so they're implemented in software!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they run 20x slower and the CPU utilization goes to max on one core - so they're implemented in software!

 

Apparently only single threaded at that. The horror.

 

It's amazing that as bad as the GPU driver situation for Linux is, the state of OpenGL on Linux is still lightyears ahead of what Apple is offering.

Edited by Chris_F
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like Apple really considers OS X to be a gaming platform, so having driver support for high end graphics cards and support for the latest graphics API isn't necessary to them

How many current-generation games actually use DX11 features?

 

I'm not asking that rhetorically - I honestly don't know. It seems to me that pretty much any title that runs on the XBox 360 or PS3 probably doesn't use/need such features.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like Apple really considers OS X to be a gaming platform, so having driver support for high end graphics cards and support for the latest graphics API isn't necessary to them

How many current-generation games actually use DX11 features?

 

I'm not asking that rhetorically - I honestly don't know. It seems to me that pretty much any title that runs on the XBox 360 or PS3 probably doesn't use/need such features.

Here you go http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_DirectX_11_support

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
However the number of games currently supporting the feature set is somewhat unimportant; if the feature set isn't exposed then no one can create games which target it anyway...
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However the number of games currently supporting the feature set is somewhat unimportant; if the feature set isn't exposed then no one can create games which target it anyway...

Right, I'm not arguing that point. It merely seems a little disingenuous for Chris to claim that Apple doesn't "consider OS X to be a gaming platform", on account of their supported OpenGL version.

 

Half the "DirectX 11 games" on Chubu's list are available for Mac, and most of the rest are available for one of the 360 or the PS3. Lack of DirectX 11 is just something you work around, whatever your target platform...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However the number of games currently supporting the feature set is somewhat unimportant; if the feature set isn't exposed then no one can create games which target it anyway...

Right, I'm not arguing that point. It merely seems a little disingenuous for Chris to claim that Apple doesn't "consider OS X to be a gaming platform", on account of their supported OpenGL version.

 

Half the "DirectX 11 games" on Chubu's list are available for Mac, and most of the rest are available for one of the 360 or the PS3. Lack of DirectX 11 is just something you work around, whatever your target platform...

Surely that doesn't mean we can't expect better of our platforms. I've never been much of a Mac fan, but this is just silly. I suspect that the CAD and 3D design packages don't depend on the new GL features, so Apple's not feeling pressure to add them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it, the only place Apple really makes money on games is iOS, most Apple hardware ships with fairly anaemic integrated GPUs, and unlike PC manufacturers they have a vested interest on maintaining comparable graphics capabilities across their product line...

 

We can expect whatever we want, but I think the unpleasant truth is that until those features are available on iOS, there won't be any impetus to implement them for OS X.

Edited by swiftcoder
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
    • By Tchom
      Hey devs!
       
      I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.
       
      Vertex Shader
      uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
      precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
    • By yahiko00
      Hi,
      Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
      For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
      I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
      I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

      Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
      Any insight would be appreciated
    • By afraidofdark
      I have just noticed that, in quake 3 and half - life, dynamic models are effected from light map. For example in dark areas, gun that player holds seems darker. How did they achieve this effect ? I can use image based lighting techniques however (Like placing an environment probe and using it for reflections and ambient lighting), this tech wasn't used in games back then, so there must be a simpler method to do this.
      Here is a link that shows how modern engines does it. Indirect Lighting Cache It would be nice if you know a paper that explains this technique. Can I apply this to quake 3' s light map generator and bsp format ?
  • Popular Now