• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lomateron

performance question

2 posts in this topic

Is it bad for performance if when rendering to every texel of a texture, in the pixel shader method I read 8 different texels of another texture to combine them and return a value.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not necessarily worse than any other approach  (it will be approximately 8x slower than 1 texture read, for obvious reasons).  For instance, if you wanted to implement an edge-detection kernel, you might need to sample from the 8 surrounding texels of that same texture.

 

There are ways to improve performance though, for instance calculating those texcoords in the vertex shader rather than the pixel shader.

 

Perhaps if you attached your code it would be easier to say whether you're being wasteful of resources or not.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on why you are doing it.

Do you think you are achieving better results on your standard 3D models in your scene?  Yes, it is wasteful.  Anything you gain in quality, which will probably be nothing but a blurrier texture, won’t be worth the extra texture samples.

 

Are you trying to make a special effect that require 8 texture reads?  Then your performance is exactly what it has to be for that effect, and that effect is twice as costly (roughly) as an effect that requires only 4 reads.  You have to decide how much performance you are going to put into your effects.

 

Dependent texture reads (what you are doing, unless you are doing as suggested above in which the texture coordinates are all calculated in the vertex shader) are slow.  Independent texture reads can be cached up-front and thus are fast enough to replace some heavy equations.  That should give you a general idea of the overhead involved in texture reads.

 

 

L. Spiro

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0