• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MisterFuzzy

Just a *bit* more accurate than bounding spheres?

4 posts in this topic

Hey!

 

I'm not exactly proficient with 3D collisions. 2D is fine, but 3D volumes are, needess to say, quite a bit different. I've been reading around the interwebs on 3D collision, and all seem to say the same thing: "Using bounding spheres..." The thing is, for my experimental FPS, bounding spheres can be too inaccurate: Players could be frustrated when they die when a bullet whizzes just in front of their face, or a clear hit travels straight through their target without ever touching the bounding box. My question is, how can I get accurate collision detection without sacrificing speed or accuracy?

 

(An article would be great, too) mellow.png

Edited by MisterFuzzy
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Often you will use bounding spheres as the first level of detention, after your game detects that it is in the players sphere, it should then either use bounding boxes on each of the bones in your skeleton, and if one of the boxes is hit, from there check to see what polygon in that box if any was hit - It all depends on how accurate you need your detection to be.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, I've already been considering the "narrow it down" apporoach, I can detect which mesh in a model was hit to appropriately apply damage (A head shot would be an instant kill, whereas a shot to the toe should do little to no damage): But what I really would like is an article on collision detection of actual Models/volumes. I can't seem to find one that involves just the models without the bounding boxes or spheres. Thanks, though!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here:

http://www.realtimerendering.com/intersections.html

With your collision, you should start out as crude as possible, and keep working down. Sphere are used because it's a quick and cheap test to perform.

If the collision is outside the sphere, it couldn't possible collide with the object.

If the collision is inside the sphere, then you can do further checks.

This helps when you have lots of objects to test for collisions.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Daaark! That's exactly what I was looking for smile.png.

 

Yeah, I plan on having each mesh hold a collision sphere, and for each particular mesh collision (on a character or vehicle) the "weight" of damage to be applied will be determined by what mesh in a model was "hit." Of course, a shotgun to a car's bumper shouldn't stop it, but the engine? Not so much. A rocket would kill a vehicle if it hit anywhere :D.

 

From there, I plan on having an undrawn "collision model" that handles any per-vertex collision that is the same shape as the model, but is far less detailed. It will cover the general area, but with far fewer vertices. It will be subdivided into meshes, so I can handle the "weight of damage" I mentioned earlier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0