Sign in to follow this  
Krankles

OpenGL Developing software using OpenGL on an OS in a VM?

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm trying to learn OpenGL 3 and 4, and I ran into a problem, I can't use the latest GLSL and OpenGL. Reason for this is because I don't have my graphics drivers installed on my system, which is Arch Linux. However, it's because running in a VM (VirtualBox, in my case), you can't install graphics drivers. The host OS is Windows 7 and the Guest OS is Arch Linux. So what I've done is install the latest Mesa 3D, which is Mesa 9.0.2.

 

I've made a thread about a problem not being able to draw a simple triangle in Linux. http://www.gamedev.net/topic/638573-opengl-cant-draw-a-triangle-no-error-either/ Although fixed now, the solution wasn't really what I wanted, I want to use the recent and better version of GLSL and OpenGL, instead of the old 1.20 GLSL. The vertex shader and fragment shader files had to be changed and for some odd reason I couldn't use the code "glEnableVertexAttribArray" and "glVertexAttribPointer". I had to use "glEnableClientState" and "glVertexPointer", which are for fixed function pipeline, which I didn't want to learn. I want to learn the programmable function pipeline.

 

So basically, what I'm asking is, is it possible to continue developing opengl applications in a VM? If so, how? (Since Mesa only supports the OpenGL 3.1 specification, as shown here http://mesa3d.org/faq.html) Or would I really have to install Arch Linux onto my hard drive with dual boot and install my graphic drivers?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally I would just install your dev environment on the bare metal and call it a day.

I use virtualbox daily but it does lag behind Parallels and maybe even VMware in its hardware graphics support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was afraid of that, oh well, virtualbox was sort of slow too :P When I tested out my pong clone, it ran a bit slow/sluggish, whereas if I compiled and ran it on windows, it would run smoothly. (Even though both of it was capped at 60 fps)

 

Anyways, thanks for the input, I guess I'll just install Arch Linux on my hard drive and do the dual boot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I had guest additions installed. Unfortunately, that's all I can do though, I can't really install any graphics drivers. My rig isn't even horrible either, CPU is i7-2700k @ 3.50GHz (4 cores 8 threads), 16 GB of RAM, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680. Gave the guest 4 GB and 2 cores.

 

It's fine though, I'll just do the dual boot. Unless someone knows a way to somehow develop opengl applications in a VM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd try with VMWare Player.

 

As far as I know, they have better support for graphics than VirtualBox and VMWare collaborates with Mesa developers themselves. You won't get more than OpenGL 3 out of mesa (software emulation), and I think VMWare video driver supports (accelerated) OpenGL 2.1 only.

 

Though it may be better just to install Arch and be done with it.

Edited by TheChubu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hilariously enough, the VMs that accelerate 3D usually accelerate D3D but not OGL for Windows. Why are you running the virtualized setup in the first place?

Edited by Promit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hilariously enough, the VMs that accelerate 3D usually accelerate D3D but not OGL for Windows. Why are you running the virtualized setup in the first place?

 

For the ease of use, so that I can run Windows and Linux at the same time, and that I don't have to restart my computer. I can just turn on the VM instantly AND I can chat to some friends since I play games on Windows on Steam. Going to OGL, I'm forced to develop on Windows (which I loathe doing) or I do the dual boot, have to restart my computer and lose the ability to talk to friends on Steam at the same time. (I usually leave the VM in the background too so I can quickly do programming or play games) Or I could buy and build my own computer again (or just one from a shop) and install it on there, but again, not willing to dish out some cash just for this.

 

However, once Steam on Linux comes out I'd be happy to switch completely from Windows to Linux. But in the mean time, I have to stay with Windows.

Edited by Krankles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Switch to VMWare/VMPlayer if you want accelerated graphics in a VM.

 

You can download a trial for free, setup your VM, then switch to the player after 30 days and keep using it.

 

Will I be able to develop OpenGL applications? Will it support higher versions of GLSL instead of Mesa's 1.20 GLSL version? Because this is the only reason I'm sort of forced to stop using VM's, to stop using Mesa and having to install a real graphics card driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only VM I have found that does OpenGL well is the Android Emulator (based on QEMU).
But even this has issues.

Hopefully one day we will have decent 3D passthrough but at the moment it is all very experimental and/or slow and buggy.

So this is one area where duel booting is still the best way for Linux and Windows dev.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, once Steam on Linux comes out I'd be happy to switch completely from Windows to Linux. But in the mean time, I have to stay with Windows.

Steam for Linux is out (albeit in beta), the problem is that it needs more games =P (although seems to be getting games at a faster pace than its Mac counterpart)

 

As for the actual topic: yeah, you won't get what you want with a virtual machine, the most you can get is VMWare and OpenGL 2 if I recall correctly (short of using a software renderer, which is what Mesa would do). Either dual boot or get a second computer and install Linux on it (in the latter case you could try to connect the computers so that somehow they can share the files without much problem, which would be probably much faster for debugging than dual boot - no idea what options are out there though).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It may be possible to set up dual boot and run your windows install as a guest while you are booted into Linux. This is fairly simple with Mac OS X and parallels. I wonder if anyone has accomplished it with virtualbox Linux and windows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are pretty much to install linux directly on the metal, or suck it up and develop on Windows.

 

I honestly recommend the latter - graphics driver support in Linux, while worlds better than it was a few years back, is still a rather sore point...

 

I wonder if anyone has accomplished it with virtualbox Linux and windows.


It's a pretty normal thing to do. We used this to access various Windows-centric network services at my previous employer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly recommend the latter - graphics driver support in Linux, while worlds better than it was a few years back, is still a rather sore point...

At least with Nvidia hardware it's way more than bearable (provided you accept using the proprietary drivers), Optimus shenanigans aside (shouldn't be an issue otherwise). If you have other hardware you're pretty much screwed though (your mileage may vary in that case).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628373
    • Total Posts
      2982306
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now