Sign in to follow this  
Hawkblood

Calculating normals

Recommended Posts

Hawkblood    1018

I am using an indexed vertex buffer as a plane (10x10 sections). I can set the y-value for the vertex, but I don't know how to recalculate the normal for that vertex. I need some help with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HappyCoder    5053
To calculate a normal for a single triangle you do the following.

x = cross(b - a, c - a)

where a, b, and c are points on the triangle and cross is the cross product of the two vectors.

Then to calculate a normal for a single point you simply sum up the normals for every face the point is part of then normalize it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hawkblood    1018

I don't think I'm doing it correctly...... I have a plane that is subdivided into a 10x10 square grid. Each of the "squares" on the grid alternate the way the square is divided by the two triangles that make up the square (I hope I'm making sense). This will give me an alternating pattern accross the plane and will result in every other vertex being affected by 8 or 4 triangles. Here is the code so far:

			//calculate the normals
			bool rev=false;
			for (int py=1;py<10;py++){//these values will be for the interior vertexes only
				for (int px=1;px<10;px++) {

					D3DXVECTOR3 tmpv;
					if (rev){
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n/=8.0f;
					}
					else {
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py-1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px-1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						D3DXVec3Cross(&tmpv,&(Range0[i].vert[px+1][py].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v),&(Range0[i].vert[px][py+1].v-Range0[i].vert[px][py].v));
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n+=tmpv;
						Range0[i].vert[px][py].n/=4.0f;
					}

					rev=!rev;

					D3DXVec3Normalize(&Range0[i].vert[px][py].n,&Range0[i].vert[px][py].n);
				}
			}

The Range0[i] is just the reference for the data of each plane. I'm only using 1 plane at the moment. This loop only normalizes the inside 9x9 verts because I will be normalizing the edge ones using data from the surounding planes of the terrain. The "rev" variable simply tells it to cycle between 8 and 4.

 

It's not coming out right, so I must be doing something wrong.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to normalise the result of the cross product, probably? Otherwise it's scaled by the sine of the angle between them.

 

You also don't need to divide by a constant scalar before normalising a vector, since scaling before normalisation is a waste of time.

 

EDIT: Also check that you are consistent with the order of your vectors in the cross product, since a X b = -b X a. Always go round the vertices in a consistent order (clockwise or anticlockwise).

Edited by Paradigm Shifter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
phil_t    8084

Have a look at this thread for calculating heightmap normals (sounds like that's what you're looking for:)

 

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/163625-fast-way-to-calculate-heightmap-normals/

(look at the 2nd post)

 

That's the simplest way and the way it's most commonly done.

 

HappyCoder's way works too, but the results you get will be dependent on the triangulation - switch the way the triangles are oriented and you'll get different results.

Edited by phil_t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HappyCoder    5053
As Paradigm Shifter pointed out, you need to make sure the vertices are consistently being wound the correct way. If you reverse the winding then the normal would be pointing the wrong way.

I would reccomend breaking up that normalizing code. It is hard to follow. I would create a seperate method for calculating normals to begin with.
void CalculateNormal(D3DXVECTOR3 *pOut, const D3DXVECTOR3 *pV1, const D3DXVECTOR3 *pV2, const D3DXVECTOR3 *pV3)
{
D3DXVec3Cross(pOut, &(*pV2 - *pV1), &(*pV3 - *pV1));
}
Then I would calculate the normals on each face and apply them to the vertices rather than having each vertex recalculate the normal of the adjacent faces.

So the steps.

Set all vertex normals to zero.
Loop through each face and calculate the normal, then add that normal to the normals of all vertices in that face.
Loop through all the vertices and normalize them.

You can normalize each face normal as you calculate them before adding them to the vertex normal. That will give each adjacent face equal weight in calculating the vertex normal. If you don't normalize them then faces with a larger surface area will have a greater influence on the calculated normal. Depending on what you want you can go either way. If the areas are roughly the same then it wont make much of a difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hawkblood    1018

I don't just have:

    B

    |

C---O---A

    |

    D

Every other one has 8 instead of 4. I think I have it working. The only probjem occurs when (for instance) A,B,C,&D are at the same elevation. It has to have more verts to show it correctly. That's not a problem because the terrain won't vary that much within that small an area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if you use all 8 neighbouring verts to calculate the normal in all cases (i.e. ignore the underlying triangulation and pretend there are always 8 triangles meeting at each vertex). Does that improve things?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this