• Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By Michael Santer
      Hi!
      We're currently two programmers and a game designer working on a turn-based tactics fantasy board game. For reference you can search for images of "Tactics Arena Online", a fairly dated game that used to have a lot of depth and complexity.
      Our goal is to use the same combat concepts, but giving it a much needed modern touch as well as a whole new set of heroes to choose from with additional abilities. The game is a mix of isometric and 3D and we plan to release the game on Steam and hopefully Android & iOS as well.
      We are looking for someone to work with us pro-bono (just like we're doing) as a 3D character artist. The skills needed are creativity, a hard working attitude and an ability to make minor animations (things like idle, walk, block and very rudimentary attack animations). A perk to have would be the ability to make some VFX. If the game makes it on steam and money starts coming in, you'd obviously be compensated for your hard work, but as it stands this is a hobby project to garnish your portfolio.
      A bit more about the game:
      This game will be an online multiplayer game where each user gets to pick up to 10 characters to place on his half of the board (this would be done before even entering matchmaking. Think runes in League of Legends for example). The user can place his 10 units of choice anywhere he likes on his half board. Some units can be used more than once. So if you want 4 knights and 2 mages or even if you want 10 clerics, you can do as you please. You can then save your setups for future use. The goal of the game is to wipe out the enemy team.
      Each character or Hero (except premium and abyss characters) start with 1 ability and they can ascend (either by playing a certain amount of matches with the character or by forcing the ascension with real money) to gain a new ability or passive. Acquiring a new character can be done by using in-game currency that you earn from playing matches or using real money with the exception of Abyss characters which can only be acquired by winning certain rare matches. The goal is to offer a freemium game with lots of customizable elements while making sure that no user can "buy power" with real money. We want everything that a paying user can get to be available to non-paying users who play the game a lot.
      Ultimately we want this to become a competitive game that people can enjoy and really get invested in. Each character is designed with options for counterplay in mind and synergy with other heroes.
       
      We sincerely believe in what this game can become and we home to find someone just as passionate as we are to get involved in this project!
    • By CrazyApplesStudio
         Hello , i would like to showcase my first game project, a simple endless casual arcade game called Apples Mania : Apple Catcher. The game has simple goal , scoring as high as possible by collecting falling apples while the difficulty gradually increases. Different apples are worth different amount of points and there are also 2 power-ups to help you in your challenge.
        The game took me about 2 months to complete and polish and i made everything except for the music tracks and some of the sound files. Made in unity and blender3d.
        Would appreciate any kind of feedback.
      Google Play Link
       
        A trailer showing basic game-play:
       
    • By Paszq
      Troglodytes are a playable races in Arpago - they usually don't talk much and most of them lives near water sources.
    • By Paszq
      a Fox in a dungeon :)
    • By Paszq
      Fox Folk is one of 3 playable races in Arpago.
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Unity How To Copy Array of Derived Classes Without Pointers

This topic is 1881 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I have a problem I am currently facing and I'm wondering if the community could help me out.  I find it's probably easier to explain with an example.

struct Base
{
};

struct Derived : public Base
{
    Derived(float newX) : x(newX)
    {
    }
    
    float x;
};

struct Unrelated : public Base
{
    Unrelated(char val) : v(val)
    {
    }
    
    char v;
}
...
 
// How to copy the data that's in mBaseArray into another struct?
// Don't want pointer copy as it's not thread safe.
 
// Below is a very simple example.
 
Module1
-----------
class Module1
{
...
    Array<Base*> mBaseArray;
}; 

 

- mBaseArray is populate in some fashion.  Notice the use of polymorphism here.
 
mBaseArray.push_back(new Derived(10));
mBaseArray.push_back(new Unrelated('c'));  
 
... Some sync point here
... After this point, I want to copy the information that is in mBaseArray into Module2's mWorkingArray.
 
Module2
-----------
class Module2
{
...
    Array<Base*> mWorkingArray;
};

 

- Want to copy the data from mBaseArray into Module2's own array.
- Copied data from mBaseArray without the use of pointers.  Want only data.
- Module2 contains a similar declaration to mBaseArray.
 
Is there a way to accomplish this?  Or is there some other method that will solve this problem?
 
If there are better ways of doing what I'm trying to accomplish, I am more than welcome to suggestions.
 
Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

If you really need to keep the polymorphism, one option is to add a virtual Clone method to the Base class. Then it will be the responsibility of each subclass to implement this Clone method by creating a new instance of its type and initializing it accordingly. You can then Clone the objects into the new array.

 

Otherwise, revisit whether you actually need polymorphism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the suggestion.  I think you were right and I was thinking about stuff in all the wrong way.  I have since moved away from polymorphism in favour of a better approach.  I think I can achieve what I want through proper message passing instead of the convoluted way I was previously using.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
class Module1
{
...
    Array<Derived> mDerivedArray;
    Array<Unrelated> mUnrelatedArray;
};
mDerivedArray.push_back(Derived(10));
mUnrelatedArray.push_back(Unrelated('c'));
class Module2
{
    Module2(Array<Derived>& d,Array<Unrelated>& u) :
        mDerivedArray(d),
        mUnrelatedArray(u) {}
    Array<Derived>& mDerivedArray;
    Array<Unrelated>& mUnrelatedArray;
};

How about doing it this way? Would be much more efficient and if you dont add a huge class hierarchy it wouldnt hurt.

You can just treat both arrays the same for some types of work if you like. It may be even easier to process the data if you dont throw away the knowledge of the exact type without being forced to and have similar things sorted together for some other types of work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement