Sign in to follow this  
sufimaster

OpenGL Orthographic matrix not working

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am having trouble creating an orthographic projection in opengl (without using glOrtho).  And before anyone tells me to use glOrtho, lets just pretend I'm using opengl 3.0 as an exercise.  Here is the way I have set up my matrix:

 

projectionMatrix.m00 = 2/WIDTH;
projectionMatrix.m11 = 2/HEIGHT;
projectionMatrix.m22 = -2/(far_plane - near_plane);
projectionMatrix.m32 = -((far_plane + near_plane)/(far_plane - near_plane));
projectionMatrix.m33 = 1;

This is your typical ortho projection matrix, taken straight from the opengl spec def. for glOrtho. 

 

When I set up a frustrum and use a perspective matrix, this works fine, but I can't use my regular screen coordinates properly.  But when I use the glOrtho matrix above, I see nothing but my background color. Anyone know what's going on? Is my matrix wrong?

 

My shader looks like this:

 

 

#version 150 core
uniform mat4 projectionMatrix;
uniform mat4 viewMatrix;
uniform mat4 modelMatrix;


in vec4 in_Position;
in vec4 in_Color;
in vec2 in_TextureCoord;


out vec4 pass_Color;
out vec2 pass_TextureCoord;


void main(void){
    gl_Position = in_Position;
    
    //override gl position with new calculated position
    gl_Position = projectionMatrix * viewMatrix * modelMatrix * in_Position;
    
    pass_Color = in_Color;
    pass_TextureCoord = in_TextureCoord;


}

 

Any help appreciated.

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this:

 

void glOrtho(float* out, float left, float right,float bottom, float top,float near, float far)
{
    
    float a = 2.0f / (right - left);
    float b = 2.0f / (top - bottom);
    float c = -2.0f / (far - near);
    
    float tx = - (right + left)/(right - left);
    float ty = - (top + bottom)/(top - bottom);
    float tz = - (far + near)/(far - near);
    
    float ortho[16] = {
        a, 0, 0, 0,
        0, b, 0, 0,
        0, 0, c, 0,
        tx, ty, tz, 1
    };
    
    memcpy(out, ortho, sizeof(float)*16);
}

 

Your vertex program should be fine if it works with your perspective matrix.  Let me know if this fixes your problem, this has been confirmed to work for OpenGL ES 2.0.

 

Shogun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What geometry are you feeding it?

 

A mistake I see sometimes is that people will be drawing, say, a quad: [b](-1,-1,0) -> (1,1,0)[/b] or some other geometry on a very small scale. Which will work fine with a perspective matrix, since you can always move your camera to near enough the object that it appears as large in the viewport as you need it to be. But in a screen-size orthographic projection, that 2x2 size quad will only ever be 2x2 pixels on screen, regardless of where you put your camera. This makes switching from perspective to ortho tricky, in that you have to think about the scale of your objects. If you make your base unit to be a meter for example (ie, 1 unit=1 meter) then you might have a character model that is 2 units tall. In an orthographic projection, this object will only be 2 pixels tall.

 

So if your geometry is small, you either need to scale the geometry or include a scaling factor when constructing your matrix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well right now all I am trying to do is get a 40 pixel by 40 sprite displayed on the screen.  I have tried messing around with the size of the sprite to no avail.  Once I get home I will take a look at the code and give you some more details about it, but I have a feeling you ar right about the scaling/size/etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I have a sprite with x,y,z (10,10,0)  with w/h 10fx10f

 

I have left as 0 and right as 680

top as as 480, bottom as 0

 

Still I see nothing.

 

Also, I am using lwjgl, in which if you have a matrix4f, I think m23 means 2nd column, 3rd row. 

 

 

 

  

 

              Sprite sprite = new Sprite("assets/texture/redman.png", 50f, 50f, 10f, 10f );
 
projectionMatrix.m00 = 2/WIDTH;
        projectionMatrix.m11 = 2/HEIGHT;
        projectionMatrix.m22 = -2/(far_plane - near_plane);
        projectionMatrix.m30 = -1;
        projectionMatrix.m31 = -1;
        projectionMatrix.m32 = -((far_plane + near_plane)/(far_plane - near_plane));
        projectionMatrix.m33 = 1;

         cameraPos = new Vector3f(0,0,-1); ...

 

 

//Translate camera        
Matrix4f.translate(cameraPos, viewMatrix, viewMatrix);

        //Scale, translate and rotate model
        Matrix4f.scale(modelScale, modelMatrix, modelMatrix);
        Matrix4f.translate(modelPos, modelMatrix, modelMatrix);
        Matrix4f.rotate((float)Math.toRadians(modelAngle.z), new Vector3f(0,0,1), modelMatrix, modelMatrix);
        Matrix4f.rotate((float)Math.toRadians(modelAngle.y), new Vector3f(0,1,0), modelMatrix, modelMatrix);
        Matrix4f.rotate((float)Math.toRadians(modelAngle.x), new Vector3f(1,0,0), modelMatrix, modelMatrix);
 

 

 

..

Edited by sufimaster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried disabling back face culling?

If your sprite doesn't have the correct winding, and back face culling is enabled , then it will not be drawn.

 

Also, in OpenGL the Y coordinate goes from bottom to top, so make sure that you are positioning the sprite inside the view (unlike the projection matrix where point 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, is the center of the screen, on an orthographic projection, it is the left bottom corner).

Although you can change this when you build the matrix.

You can also try a bigger sprite, like with a size of (100, 100).

 

One last note. You should try the function Shogun posted to calculate your matrix. Somehow, and i might be wrong, but it doesn't seem like your matrix is being calculated like it should (again, it may be just me).

 

Don't know if this is your problem, but try it and see.

Edited by __SKYe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok- so i used Shogun's method, I messed around with the camera position and near and far plane.

 

Now:

near plane is 1f, far plane is 100f (though I dont see why this matters in an ortho projection)

Camera is located at 0,0,-1

 

Sprite is at 0,0,0 dim: 10x10 pixels.

 

I can actually see it on the screen now, but it seems like everything is vanishing at the origin point, as attached:

 

This is supposed to be a quad, but the perspective is all wonky. Any idea what's going on now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you sending this to your shader?  Are you multiplying it by your previous projection matrix before doing so?  These are two other areas where things can go wrong, and you haven't provided sufficient info to diagnose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how I send it to the shader: I know this part works since the perspective projection matrix works, but the ortho produces wierd results. 

 

As for my previous projection matrix - this is my first projection matrix - so I am not multiplying it by anything before sending it tothe shader. Should I be?

///upload matrices to uniform varis in shader
        GL20.glUseProgram(shaderObject.pId);
        
        projectionMatrix.store(matrix44Buffer);matrix44Buffer.flip();            
        GL20.glUniformMatrix4(projectionMatrixLocation, false, matrix44Buffer);
        
        viewMatrix.store(matrix44Buffer);matrix44Buffer.flip();
        GL20.glUniformMatrix4(viewMatrixLocation, false, matrix44Buffer);
        
        modelMatrix.store(matrix44Buffer);matrix44Buffer.flip();
        GL20.glUniformMatrix4(modelMatrixLocation, false, matrix44Buffer);
        
        
        GL20.glUseProgram(0);
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I managed to figure this out - apparently I was not accessing the matrix elements correctly - transposing their accessors = m03 instead of m30 for example for the translation matrix.  All is well now! Thanks everyone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed you're transforming your matrices as so:

 

projectionMatrix * viewMatrix * modelMatrix

 

This is also how I do it, but a lot of people do it opposite (and I think glOrtho does too). If this is the case, than the glOrtho() code provided above may be correct, but it just has to be transposed. Here's my camera's ortho code:

void Camera::Ortho(float width, float height, float zNear, float zFar)
	{
		Ortho(0.0f, width, 0.0f, height, zNear, zFar);
	}
	
	
	void Camera::Ortho(float left, float right, float top, float bottom, float zNear, float zFar)
	{
		// find the translation vector
		const float tx = - (right + left)/(right - left);
		const float ty = - (top + bottom)/(top - bottom);
		const float tz = - (zFar + zNear)/(zFar - zNear);
		
		// column 1
		projMat.m[ 0] = 2.0f / (right - left);
		projMat.m[ 1] = 0;
		projMat.m[ 2] = 0;
		projMat.m[ 3] = 0;
		
		// column 2
		projMat.m[ 4] = 0;
		projMat.m[ 5] = 2.0f / (top - bottom);
		projMat.m[ 6] = 0;
		projMat.m[ 7] = 0;
		
		// column 3
		projMat.m[ 8] = 0;
		projMat.m[ 9] = 0;
		projMat.m[10] = -2.0f / (zFar - zNear);
		projMat.m[11] = 0;
		
		// column 4
		projMat.m[12] = tx;
		projMat.m[13] = ty;
		projMat.m[14] = tz;
		projMat.m[15] = 1;
		
		mode = PROJECTION_MODE_ORTHOGONAL;
		Update(0.0f); // update the camera
	}

 

The first method is just a shortcut I created where the origin is in the upper-left corner of the screen is treated as the origin. The second method is what would emulate glOrtho() from the old OpenGL days, only it should be multiplied first like you have it.

 

Also, keep in mind that all matrix elements are an array of 16 floats stored on a column-by-column basis:

m[ 0] m[ 4] m[ 8] m[12]
m[ 1] m[ 5] m[ 9] m[13]
m[ 2] m[ 6] m[10] m[14]
m[ 3] m[ 7] m[11] m[15]

 

When you feed the matrix as a 4x4 to OpenGL, make sure that the transpose argument is GL_FALSE. That's very important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you feed the matrix as a 4x4 to OpenGL, make sure that the transpose argument is GL_FALSE. That's very important.

 

Not really; please see http://www.opengl.org/archives/resources/faq/technical/transformations.htm

 

Column-major versus row-major is purely a notational convention. Note that post-multiplying with column-major matrices produces the same result as pre-multiplying with row-major matrices. The OpenGL Specification and the OpenGL Reference Manual both use column-major notation. You can use any notation, as long as it's clearly stated.

 

Also

 

Sadly, the use of column-major format in the spec and blue book has resulted in endless confusion in the OpenGL programming community. Column-major notation suggests that matrices are not laid out in memory as a programmer would expect.

 

OpenGL is perfectly capable of using either row-major or column-major matrices (and all the more so with the programmable pipeline); the only important thing is that you be consistent in your code.  That just means getting the multiplication orders correct in both your C/C++ code and your shader code.  You don't have to use the same major-ness in your shaders as you use in your C/C++: either transpose before sending (either manually or by using GL_TRUE in your glUniformMatrix call) or flip the multiplication order in your shader code.

 

So what's actually important is that you know which major-ness each element of your code uses and that you set things up appropriately for that; otherwise the importance of row-major versus column-major is hugely overstated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628326
    • Total Posts
      2982086
  • Similar Content

    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
    • By Abecederia
      So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
      Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
      Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!
    • By test opty
      Hi,
      I'm trying to learn OpenGL through a website and have proceeded until this page of it. The output is a simple triangle. The problem is the complexity.
      I have read that page several times and tried to analyse the code but I haven't understood the code properly and completely yet. This is the code:
       
      #include <glad/glad.h> #include <GLFW/glfw3.h> #include <C:\Users\Abbasi\Desktop\std_lib_facilities_4.h> using namespace std; //****************************************************************************** void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height); void processInput(GLFWwindow *window); // settings const unsigned int SCR_WIDTH = 800; const unsigned int SCR_HEIGHT = 600; const char *vertexShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " gl_Position = vec4(aPos.x, aPos.y, aPos.z, 1.0);\n" "}\0"; const char *fragmentShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "out vec4 FragColor;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " FragColor = vec4(1.0f, 0.5f, 0.2f, 1.0f);\n" "}\n\0"; //******************************* int main() { // glfw: initialize and configure // ------------------------------ glfwInit(); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MAJOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MINOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_PROFILE, GLFW_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE); // glfw window creation GLFWwindow* window = glfwCreateWindow(SCR_WIDTH, SCR_HEIGHT, "My First Triangle", nullptr, nullptr); if (window == nullptr) { cout << "Failed to create GLFW window" << endl; glfwTerminate(); return -1; } glfwMakeContextCurrent(window); glfwSetFramebufferSizeCallback(window, framebuffer_size_callback); // glad: load all OpenGL function pointers if (!gladLoadGLLoader((GLADloadproc)glfwGetProcAddress)) { cout << "Failed to initialize GLAD" << endl; return -1; } // build and compile our shader program // vertex shader int vertexShader = glCreateShader(GL_VERTEX_SHADER); glShaderSource(vertexShader, 1, &vertexShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(vertexShader); // check for shader compile errors int success; char infoLog[512]; glGetShaderiv(vertexShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(vertexShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::VERTEX::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // fragment shader int fragmentShader = glCreateShader(GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER); glShaderSource(fragmentShader, 1, &fragmentShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(fragmentShader); // check for shader compile errors glGetShaderiv(fragmentShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(fragmentShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::FRAGMENT::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // link shaders int shaderProgram = glCreateProgram(); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, vertexShader); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, fragmentShader); glLinkProgram(shaderProgram); // check for linking errors glGetProgramiv(shaderProgram, GL_LINK_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetProgramInfoLog(shaderProgram, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::PROGRAM::LINKING_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } glDeleteShader(vertexShader); glDeleteShader(fragmentShader); // set up vertex data (and buffer(s)) and configure vertex attributes float vertices[] = { -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // left 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // right 0.0f, 0.5f, 0.0f // top }; unsigned int VBO, VAO; glGenVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glGenBuffers(1, &VBO); // bind the Vertex Array Object first, then bind and set vertex buffer(s), //and then configure vertex attributes(s). glBindVertexArray(VAO); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertices), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 3 * sizeof(float), (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); // note that this is allowed, the call to glVertexAttribPointer registered VBO // as the vertex attribute's bound vertex buffer object so afterwards we can safely unbind glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, 0); // You can unbind the VAO afterwards so other VAO calls won't accidentally // modify this VAO, but this rarely happens. Modifying other // VAOs requires a call to glBindVertexArray anyways so we generally don't unbind // VAOs (nor VBOs) when it's not directly necessary. glBindVertexArray(0); // uncomment this call to draw in wireframe polygons. //glPolygonMode(GL_FRONT_AND_BACK, GL_LINE); // render loop while (!glfwWindowShouldClose(window)) { // input // ----- processInput(window); // render // ------ glClearColor(0.2f, 0.3f, 0.3f, 1.0f); glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); // draw our first triangle glUseProgram(shaderProgram); glBindVertexArray(VAO); // seeing as we only have a single VAO there's no need to // bind it every time, but we'll do so to keep things a bit more organized glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 3); // glBindVertexArray(0); // no need to unbind it every time // glfw: swap buffers and poll IO events (keys pressed/released, mouse moved etc.) glfwSwapBuffers(window); glfwPollEvents(); } // optional: de-allocate all resources once they've outlived their purpose: glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glDeleteBuffers(1, &VBO); // glfw: terminate, clearing all previously allocated GLFW resources. glfwTerminate(); return 0; } //************************************************** // process all input: query GLFW whether relevant keys are pressed/released // this frame and react accordingly void processInput(GLFWwindow *window) { if (glfwGetKey(window, GLFW_KEY_ESCAPE) == GLFW_PRESS) glfwSetWindowShouldClose(window, true); } //******************************************************************** // glfw: whenever the window size changed (by OS or user resize) this callback function executes void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height) { // make sure the viewport matches the new window dimensions; note that width and // height will be significantly larger than specified on retina displays. glViewport(0, 0, width, height); } As you see, about 200 lines of complicated code only for a simple triangle. 
      I don't know what parts are necessary for that output. And also, what the correct order of instructions for such an output or programs is, generally. That start point is too complex for a beginner of OpenGL like me and I don't know how to make the issue solved. What are your ideas please? What is the way to figure both the code and the whole program out correctly please?
      I wish I'd read a reference that would teach me OpenGL through a step-by-step method. 
  • Popular Now