Sign in to follow this  
TheChubu

OpenGL Organizing mesh and buffer classes

Recommended Posts

Hi. So far I have this thing that can render a heightmap with per-vertex color and per-vertex shading (huzzah for next-gen graphics!).

 

The thing is that the GL class I did is tailored to render that specific heightmap and nothing else, so my next step would be refactor it so it can render several objects (and maybe several program objects), but i'm at a loss about how should I set up my mesh class, how to handle the resulting mesh objects and how to relate them to their VBOs and such.

 

Currently DataMesh holds an array of floats with the already processed (interleaved color,normal,position) data and a FloatBuffer for passing the data to OpenGL (perils of Java Native Interface) but I have to set up something else that connects the mesh with the OpenGL specific things, ie, Vertex Array Objects, Vertex Buffer Object and shaders going to be used to render that mesh.

 

What should I store in my mesh class? It is ok to store API specific things on it? (ie, VBO id, maybe shader Ids that it uses) Or it should I set up some manager to do that thing? In which case, how would that manager operate? What data it would contain? When generating vbos, there is a "generic" way to handle attribute pointers? Or I should make a method for each possible vbo configuration? (ie, one method for vertex + color, another for vertex + color + normal, another for vertex + normal + texture coords, etc).

 

On an unrelated note, it is okay to assume that every vertex passed will always have its w component equal to 1.0f?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, a Mesh is essentially a VAO, plus some parameters for topology (triangle lists, strips etc) and offsets. It's composed from vertex buffers, an index buffer, and a "vertex declaration" (D3D9 terminology) slash "input layout" (D3D10+ terminology). It's essentially an array of the data that you wind up passing as VertexAttribPointer. Tends to look like this:

 

struct VertexElement{
    unsigned int Index;
    int Size;
    int Type;
    unsigned int Stride;
    unsigned int Offset;
    class GraphicsBuffer* Buffer;
    unsigned int Divisor;
};
   
 VertexElement ve[] = {
        { VE_Position, 3, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, position), rawVb },
        { VE_TexCoord, 2, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, texcoord), rawVb },
        { VE_Diffuse, 4, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, color), rawVb },
    };
 
 

That plus an index buffer is enough information to recompose the relevant GL calls to create a VAO. Each of these things gets paired with a material and a few other things (bounding volumes for example) and away we go.

Edited by Promit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me, a Mesh is essentially a VAO, plus some parameters for topology (triangle lists, strips etc) and offsets. It's composed from vertex buffers, an index buffer, and a "vertex declaration" (D3D9 terminology) slash "input layout" (D3D10+ terminology). It's essentially an array of the data that you wind up passing as VertexAttribPointer. Tends to look like this:

 

struct VertexElement{
    unsigned int Index;
    int Size;
    int Type;
    unsigned int Stride;
    unsigned int Offset;
    class GraphicsBuffer* Buffer;
    unsigned int Divisor;
};
   
 VertexElement ve[] = {
        { VE_Position, 3, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, position), rawVb },
        { VE_TexCoord, 2, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, texcoord), rawVb },
        { VE_Diffuse, 4, GL_FLOAT, sizeof(SimpleVertex), offsetof(SimpleVertex, color), rawVb },
    };
 
 

That plus an index buffer is enough information to recompose the relevant GL calls to create a VAO. Each of these things gets paired with a material and a few other things (bounding volumes for example) and away we go.

 

I agree with this, plus over the past year or so I have actually started including the type of draw call with the 'geometry' type classes in my engine.  This allows you the freedom to use whatever pipeline execution method makes the most sense (i.e. indexed or not, instanced or not, etc...) for that geometry class.  In general, I consider any inputs into the pipeline that are used for vertex assembly to be part of the geometry, along with a method for configuring those inputs and executing the draw call.

 

That keeps everything in a nice clean package, fully encapsulating the concept of a mesh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I normally do - just expand the R3 based vertex to R4 in the vertex shader when I do the multiply.  That coordinate is only there to allow you to do perspective projection, so you can use it as you see fit with your projection matrices.  If you don't need to do projection, then you don't even need the w-value at all and can just set it to 1 in the output vertex position.

 

The only time I have heard of not setting it to 1 is to perform a cheap scaling of the vertex position.  If you set the w value to be something other than 1, then when the rasterizer does the w divide then it will scale the position.  That isn't really necessary in most cases, so I would say that you can safely assume w=1 in most cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628383
    • Total Posts
      2982371
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now