• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Illuyankas

C# DeWitters implementation inconsistent

2 posts in this topic

I made an attempt to implement DeWitter's game loop (http://dewitters.koonsolo.com/gameloop.html) in C#, but during testing it seemed that my implementation is inaccurate. I am aware that it will never be perfectly accurate but the measured results don't look quite right.

I am not sure if the problem is with the loop itself or simply with the way it is measured.

public abstract class Game
{
        private Stopwatch Clock;
        private TimeSpan nextTick;
        private int _targetTicksPerSecond = 30;
        private TimeSpan _targetFrameLength;
        private int _maxFrameSkip = 5;

        private void GameLoop()
        {
            int framesSkipped = 0;
            float interpolation = 0f;
            nextTick = Clock.Elapsed; // Clock initialized by caller method
            _targetFrameLength = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(1000.0 / (double)_targetTicksPerSecond);

            while( _window.IsOpen() ) 
            {
                framesSkipped = 0;
                while (Clock.Elapsed > nextTick && framesSkipped < _maxFrameSkip)
                {
                    Window.DispatchEvents();
                    Update();
                    nextTick += _targetFrameLength;
                    framesSkipped++;
                }
                interpolation = (float)((Clock.Elapsed + _targetFrameLength - nextTick).TotalMilliseconds / _targetFrameLength.TotalMilliseconds);
                Draw(Renderer, interpolation);
            }
        }

        private Stopwatch testWatch;
        private TimeSpan prev;
        protected virtual void Update()
        {
            Debug.WriteLine((testWatch.Elapsed - prev).ToString());
            prev = testWatch.Elapsed;
        }

        // empty method in derived test class
        protected abstract void Draw(RenderTexture renderer, float elapsed); 
}

 

A typical output looks like this:

00:00:00.0281242 | 00:00:00.0331724
00:00:00.0336379 | 00:00:00.0306271
00:00:00.0304994 | 00:00:00.0309980
00:00:00.0343010 | 00:00:00.0329622
00:00:00.0331906 | 00:00:00.0320139
00:00:00.0275725 | 00:00:00.0276520
00:00:00.0323255 | 00:00:00.0309111
00:00:00.0283663 | 00:00:00.0338622
00:00:00.0431601 | 00:00:00.0312895
00:00:00.0214689 | 00:00:00.0302318
00:00:00.0331552 | 00:00:00.0343154
00:00:00.0304954 | 00:00:00.0309841

 

I tried the loop with different measuring approaches using StopWatch.ElapsedMilliseconds, StopWatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds etc, but over the long run, measured results are pretty much the same. All the methods called are empty except for SFML's DispatchEvents() (though removing it made no difference).

I'd really like any pointers on what I might have done wrong with the loop and/or measuring and how it might be improved.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see anything wrong.

What exactly is inaccurate? that your numbers aren't all near 33ms?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see anything wrong.

What exactly is inaccurate? that your numbers aren't all near 33ms?

 

Yes the timings are mostly between 28-34ms, after several measurements it does turn out that the average is 33ms +- 100mus. Which is pretty close to the desired 33.33, but the inconsistency is somewhat bothersome.
 

Edited by Illuyankas
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0