• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
drjaydenm

OpenGL
Help with CGFX

8 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I am making a game engine with multiple rendering interfaces (currently only DX10 and OpenGL 3) and am trying to integrate CGFX into my pipeline. I have looked at the docs for CGFX but cannot seem to find anything that suits my needs.

 

What I am trying to do is compile a CGFX file to HLSL byte code as I can then just use my DX10Effect class to load the bytecode to a DX10 effect and DX will be happy. Looking at the docs for CGFX it seems I cannot get the DX10 bytecode from a CGFX effect. This means I will have to use CG to do all the effect technique and parameter work instead of DX itself.

 

Does anyone know if it is possible to get the DX10 bytecode from a CGFX effect?

 

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help,

 

I could just do that but I am trying to look for a universal solution where I can take the CGFX effect, compile to the specific rendering API like DX10, save the results as a DX10 effect and then load the DX10 effect at runtime without using the CGFX API to set each parameter and so on.

 

I could always just compile the effect using CGFX, get all programs in the effect, extract the DX10 data and make a DX10 effect out of that, although I am pretty sure I would lose the information on techniques and parameters.

 

Any ideas guys?

 

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cgD3D10GetCompiledProgram is suppose to return the compiled shader code. You might be right in that you could loose technique information. You may also loose any data that was compiled out.

 

I had ALOT of issues with using cg in a similar situation to yours. Kept hitting a limitation with cg, made a work around for it then hit another limitation....this went on for a while. In the end I used HLSL2GLSL. It was made for dx9 and pre ogl3 but the source is available so you can modify it to work with dx10 and suit your own needs. There is also an updated forked version made for unity so that might be worth checking out too.

Edited by Nyssa
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice,

 

I will take a look at HLSL2GLSL as it does look promising. It is sad though, that CG is not able to output an effect file as DX bytecode and requires you to use their runtime instead of DX's. If it allowed you to do that, it would be an efficient solution to cross platform shaders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  It is sad though, that CG is not able to output an effect file as DX bytecode

 

cgD3D10GetCompiledProgram will return a ID3D10Blob object. From that object you can call GetBufferPointer and that will be the compiled code for a program. It is that data that you pass into say ID3D10Device::CreateVertexShader to create your shadersIf you're after the whole effect file as byte code then I don't think cg will do that (or directx for that matter).

 

 requires you to use their runtime instead of DX's

 

If you can do without effects and just use programs, then you could also compile these shaders in an offline mode and save the compiled data to file. That way your runtime engine could just use dx libs instead of cg? Runtime loading would also be a bit faster. Of course though you would need to check that all this works with the cross-platformness of your engine.

Edited by Nyssa
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about using just the Vertex and Fragment programs instead of the whole effect file. Is there any benefit (other than the fact I can use techniques and passes), of using effects instead of the individual programs if I am doing all my state changes in my program code instead of in the effect? I can't think of any reason off the top of my head.

 

Looks like i'll try using individual programs and see how it goes.

Edited by drjaydenm
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Is there any benefit (other than the fact I can use techniques and passes) of using effects instead of the individual programs

 

Not that I know of. I personally use programs rather than effects. I guess the downside is you need to do all the state changes manually, but you're doing that already anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By sandor_deak
      Hi,
      I started to learn OpenGL about 3 months ago and I've been working on a game engine which uses tools from Riemannian geometry to display curved spaces. Here is a link to a video. (It has a lot to improve yet.) I'm a mathematician but I would like to work in the game industry in a programmer role and I'm making this engine to build my portfolio. I would appreciate some feedback and opinions about the engine, how "convincing" it is as a portfolio, and also some advice about the game industry. Thanks a lot!
    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
  • Popular Now