• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Prinz Eugn

NineDev.net

18 posts in this topic

I was shooting for something that resembled an abstract version of a "G".. very flowy, curvy.. almost not a G at all.   Throwing another plain "G" into a circle didn't sit well with me but I have to recognize the history of it.  I can see what you are saying though.  

 

I wanted the text "gamedev.net" to be bigger and more clear so I went with droid sans and increased the height of the font.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, not a big fan of the change. Granted the old 'G' is getting borderline antique, but this is a little too abstract -- If you took away the text, I'd have never made the assiciation, even with the familiar blue circle, and I've been here probably nearly as long as anyone. It's too loose, what's it suppose to be? Is it a '9'? a sloppy 'S'? An upside-down 5?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, not a big fan of the change. Granted the old 'G' is getting borderline antique, but this is a little too abstract -- If you took away the text, I'd have never made the assiciation, even with the familiar blue circle, and I've been here probably nearly as long as anyone. It's too loose, what's it suppose to be? Is it a '9'? a sloppy 'S'? An upside-down 5?

 

The letter "G"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For fun, maybe you should change the text and banners to say, "NineDev.net".

 

The "G" does look like something between a "9" and a Dothraki sword. :P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing topic from the shape of the glyph... The range of colours gave the old icon a lot more depth as well. It had shadows as well as highlights, using a range of blues, and also a more complex shape to the background gradient rather than a straight bar. It's a subtle difference, but IMO it made the old one look a lot more professional.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing topic from the shape of the glyph... The range of colours gave the old icon a lot more depth as well. It had shadows as well as highlights, using a range of blues, and also a more complex shape to the background gradient rather than a straight bar. It's a subtle difference, but IMO it made the old one look a lot more professional.

 

The web 2.0 shiny button effect?

 

[attachment=14060:gamedevlogo2013.png]

 

vs

 

[attachment=14056:GDNet-G-rendered.png]

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah having both enlarged side-by-side, the difference is that generic "shiny button effect" laugh.png

 

When I wrote the last post, I was going by memory and didn't even remember that the old logo did use this effect though, I just noticed that there wasn't shadow/midtone/highlight any more, only midtone/highlight -- that's the actual issue I meant to raise.

The shiny button effect itself isn't necessary, but to break down what it does in the old logo -- the "half moon" section at the bottom of the circle becomes the shadow part, with the rest of the circle being the mid-tone, then a circular highlight is applied over both. It's not that particular configuration of shapes that I remembered, just the fact that it used a palette of 3 colours in the effect.

 

Even the outer ring of the old one has a shadow at the bottom right to add some depth by contrasting against the brighter top half of the centre circle.

 

There's also a subtle hue change between the two logos (the new one is much more green/teal than the old one), and the choice to have the glyph cut through the outer ring.

 

[edit] Also, the new one's centre circle isn't exactly centred, with the width of the white void differing in places, and the circles aren't anti-aliased as well (in both high and low res this is noticeable).

Edited by Hodgman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hooray for paint program presets. Put beside the white site border and in the dark blue square makes it look all smeared and washed out.

The look of the site continues to decline to that one of those fly-by-night parked domains. Edited by Daaark
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've dropped all shading from the logo..  it's blue and white now.   More modern logo designs don't have much in the line of shading anyway.

 

 

Hooray for paint program presets. Put beside the white site border and in the dark blue square makes it look all smeared and washed out.

The look of the site continues to decline to that one of those fly-by-night parked domains.

 

Heh.. point me towards the parked domain page you are reminded of.

Edited by Michael Tanczos
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't realize playing with the site logo was a thing we could do.

 

[attachment=14061:BevelWhiteWDropShadowWCloudWBorder.jpg][attachment=14062:BevelWhiteWDropShadowWEtchedWBorder.jpg]

 

I bet giving it to an actual artist instead of a programmer-art gimp user could give some amazing results.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, the current iteration is much better, the extra crossbar is exactly what it needed. I like it overall, although to me it still looks a little washed out, like the background of the G needs to be slightly darker.

 

Also, I made the mistake of getting bored and having Photoshop open (and reading frob's post, Attack of the Difference Clouds), so I have an absurd amount of logo ideas I need to drop somewhere...

 

1. [attachment=14073:GDnetLogo1.png]

 

2. [attachment=14072:GDnetLogo2.png]

 

3. [attachment=14071:GDnetLogo3.png]

 

4. [attachment=14070:GDnetLogo4.png]

 

5. [attachment=14069:GDnetLogo5.png]

 

6. [attachment=14068:GDnetLogo6.png]

 

7. [attachment=14067:GDnetLogo7.png]

 

8. [attachment=14066:GDnetLogo8.png]

 

9. [attachment=14065:GDnetLogo9.png]

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
^ That's pretty nifty. I like the textures and shading, my personal favs are number 3 and 8.

I'm not a fan of the new design changes either. The logo looks bland and the typography isn't in balance with the rest of the site.

Michael, we've got many professional designers on this forum. Why don't you hire one of them if you want to give the website an overhaul?
Or, if the budget's tight, at least start a competition for things like logos and stuff, winner gets lifetime GDNet+ membership or something.

Cheers,
Moritz
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ That's pretty nifty. I like the textures and shading, my personal favs are number 3 and 8.

I'm not a fan of the new design changes either. The logo looks bland and the typography isn't in balance with the rest of the site.

Michael, we've got many professional designers on this forum. Why don't you hire one of them if you want to give the website an overhaul?
Or, if the budget's tight, at least start a competition for things like logos and stuff, winner gets lifetime GDNet+ membership or something.

Cheers,
Moritz

 

Well we don't really have a budget to hire a designer.. we have enough of a budget to keep the site running.   I'm after something that no longer is a traditional "G", retains the blue circle, and doesn't contain any textures or shiny button look.. basically I'm looking for minimalism in the design of the circular part of the logo that also doesn't overtly look like just a big plain "G" in a circle like we've had the last 13 years.

 

Of Prinz's #1 looks closest to what I'm talking about in terms of minimalism and possibly even abstraction of the "G".  Believe it or not, the G in the logo from the first post is also professionally designed typography for a capital "G".

 

I don't want to mislead you guys with the idea that the logo is an open project though.   At this point in time 100% of my energy is going into both writing articles/tutorials and creating everything that is going to be needed to facilitate that for others.   When we open up the article section again I'm going to begin changing the overall look of the site to incorporate more tutorials.

 

See here:

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/639725-article-inspiration/

Edited by Michael Tanczos
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Prinz Eugn: Awesome stuff! I like all of them, but I personally think #8 is too... EA. Anyway, I really like them.

 

To put a spin (pun not intended, but now that I see it, I intend it) on some of it, what if the G was rotated to be a standby button? Here's a few examples:

 

[attachment=14075:GDnetLogo1.png]

[attachment=14076:GDnetLogo2.png]

[attachment=14077:GDnetLogo3.png]

 

Of course, all I did was rotate these. A proper "standby button/G" logo would have to be manually made to make it look super awesome...

 

Edit: alternatively, you could do an actual standby button, but rotated to be a G (of course, it might need to be stylized a bit more to make it look like a G):

 

[attachment=14078:IEC5009_Standby_Symbol.svg.png]

 

I'd play around with these ideas in Inkscape but I've got a DE test I need to take...

 

Edit edit: Also, the current logo looks much better than than the first "9" logo. But I like some of Prinz Eugn's variants a lot.

 

Also, I think favicon.ico needs to be updated...

Edited by Cornstalks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, the version currently up on the main page solves the recognition problems with the first attempt. Opening up the circle and the little 'crossbar' makes all the difference.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A logo contest would be fun... but as Michael says, there's bigger fish to fry for the site. My logos were just a fun exercise in Photoshop, and I think Michael fixed the biggest problem with the new logo- it was just a little to abstract to be recognized as the letter "G" if it weren't next to Gamedev.net, and it sounds like people were still confused.

 

I think the logo still needs a little adjustment, either to be bigger so the G can stand on it's own or add more detail to the background. I think the no-gradient/texture style only works well when the logo is pretty big. I tried adding detail to using the the current G, just to see what would happen, and also tried a skinner version:

 

10. [attachment=14093:GDnetLogo10.png]

 

11. [attachment=14092:GDnetLogo11.png]

 

12. [attachment=14091:GDnetLogo12.png]

 

13. [attachment=14090:GDnetLogo13.png]

 

 

Okay, I need to start drafting that article now...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0