• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
StanLee

Camera for Raytracing

3 posts in this topic

Hello,

 

I am working on a raytracer at the moment and I come across some issues with the camera model. I just don't seem to manage the calculation of the direction vector of my rays.

 

Let's say we have given an image resolution of resX x resY, a position pos of the camera, the up vector, the direction vector dir (the direction in which the camera is looking) and a field of view for the horizontal and vertical component fovX and fovY. With the help of these values I can manage to calculate the focal length and thus the width of my pixels.

[url=http://www.imagebanana.com/view/ysihutsh/fovx.jpg]fovx.jpg[/URL]

 

But when I do the same for the height I'll get another focal length.

[url=http://www.imagebanana.com/view/v041vsp2/fovy.jpg]fovy.jpg[/URL]

 

There is something I must be missing because the focal length determines the distance between my camera position and the image plane and thus must be unique.

But let's suppose that I've got one unique focal length, then calculating the direction of a ray for the screen coordinates (x,y) should be done with this formula.

[url=http://www.imagebanana.com/view/wa3nrteo/formel.jpg]formel.jpg[/URL]

I adjust the direction vector in such a way, that he is always in the center of a pixel.

 

Unfortunately applying this to my raytracer yields absolutely no results. sad.png

Edited by StanLee
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what the diagrams indicate is the x-focal length and y-focal length, such that the actual focal length should be equal to sqrt(fx^2 + fy^2), by the Pythagorean Theorem. Though I don't fully understand the diagrams.

 

What I like to do is calculate only the corners of the focal plane, and interpolate the focal point for an arbitrary pixel using bilinear interpolation. It's clearer and a bit faster. Then the camera direction is just the focal point minus the camera position (normalized, of course). You might find some of my code useful: this, along with this.

Edited by Bacterius
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot! Your code helped me to figure out that I totally forgot to normalize the scale of my image plane.
Before normalization my image plane was centered around (0,0,500) and the top left corner around (-512, 384, 500) in world space. Without adjustments of the object positions and sizes absolutely nothing could be seen.
Now I used your proposed equation for the focal length f:

[eqn] f = \sqrt{f_{x}^{2} + f_{y}^{2}} [/eqn]

 

Everything works fine by now though I still have a question. When I choose a wide angle for the horizontal field of view, let's say 120°, I see spheres getting oblong at the border of the screen.  Is this the so called "fisheye"-effect due to a wide field of view?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything works fine by now though I still have a question. When I choose a wide angle for the horizontal field of view, let's say 120°, I see spheres getting oblong at the border of the screen.  Is this the so called "fisheye"-effect due to a wide field of view?

Yes, a flat image plane doesn't work well at high fields of view because it tends to cause extreme distortion at the edges. A flat image plane works best for fields of view between 30 and 80 degrees, in my experience. For such wide-angle shots you'll want a different kind of camera, probably spherical or fisheye (though distortion is unavoidable, but at least you'll be expecting it in that case).

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0