Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Raytracing via compute shader

Recommended Posts

StanLee    157

I am trying to do some raytracing on the GPU via the compute shader in OpenGL and I came across a very strange behaviour.

For every pixel in the screen I launch a compute shader invocation and this is how the compute shader looks like:



#version 430

struct Camera{
    vec4    pos, dir, up, xAxis ;
    float   focalLength;
    float   pW, pH;

struct Sphere{
    vec4    position;
    float   radius;

struct Ray{
    vec3    origin;
    vec3    dir;

uniform Camera      camera;
uniform uint        width;
uniform uint        height;

uniform image2D outputTexture;

float hitSphere(Ray r, Sphere s){
    float s_ov = dot(r.origin, r.dir);
    float s_mv = dot(, r.dir);
    float s_mm = dot(,;
    float s_mo = dot(, r.origin);
    float s_oo = dot(r.origin, r.origin);
    float d = s_ov*s_ov-2.0f*s_ov*s_mv+s_mv*s_mv-s_mm+2.0f*s_mo*s_oo+s.radius*s.radius;
    if(d < 0){
        return -1.0f;
    } else if(d == 0){
        return (s_mv-s_ov);
    } else {
        float t1 = 0, t2 = 0;
        t1 = s_mv-s_ov;
        t2 = (t1-sqrt(d));
        t1 = (t1+sqrt(d));
        return t1>t2? t2 : t1 ;

Ray initRay(uint x, uint y, Camera cam){
    Ray ray;
    ray.origin =;
    ray.dir = * cam.focalLength + vec3(1, 0, 0)*( float(x-(width/2)))*cam.pW
                              + * (float(y-(height/2))*cam.pH);
    ray.dir = normalize(ray.dir);
    return ray;

layout (local_size_x = 16, local_size_y = 16, local_size_z = 1) in;
void main(){
    uint x = gl_GlobalInvocationID.x;
    uint y = gl_GlobalInvocationID.y;
    if(x < 1024 && y < 768){
        float t = 0.0f;

        Ray r = initRay(x, y, camera);
        Sphere sp ={vec4(0.0f, 0.0f, 20.0f, 0.0f), 2.0f};

        t = hitSphere(r, sp);
        if(t <= -0.001f){
            imageStore(outputTexture, ivec2(x, y), vec4(0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 1.0));
        } else {
            imageStore(outputTexture, ivec2(x, y), vec4(0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0));

Rendering on the GPU yields the following broken image:


Rendering on the CPU with the same algorithm yields this image:


I can't figure out the problem since I just copied and pasted the "hitSphere()" and "initRay()" functions into my compute shader. First I thought I haven't dispatched enough work groups, but then the background wouldn't be blue, so this can't be the case. This is how I dispatch my compute shader:

#define WORK_GROUP_SIZE 16
//width = 1024, height = 768
void OpenGLRaytracer::renderScene(int width, int height){

    glDispatchCompute(width/WORK_GROUP_SIZE, height/WORK_GROUP_SIZE,1);


Then I changed the position of the sphere in x direction to the right:


In y direction to the top:


And in both directions (right and top):


When I change the position far enough in both directions to the left and to the bottom, then the sphere actually disappears. It seems that all the calculations on the GPU only work in one quarter of the image (top-right) and happen to yield false results in the other three quarters.


I am totally clueless at the moment and don't even know how to start fixing this.

Edited by StanLee

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
powly k    657

Not sure how you derived that sphere intersection formula, but it looks quite different to what I've used - are your implementations exactly the same on CPU and GPU?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vilem Otte    2938

Assuming your intersection code is right (it should be), the bug is elsewhere:


Ray initRay(uint x, uint y, Camera cam){
    Ray ray;
    ray.origin =;
    ray.dir = * cam.focalLength + vec3(1, 0, 0)*( float(x-(width/2)))*cam.pW
                              + * (float(y-(height/2))*cam.pH);
    ray.dir = normalize(ray.dir);
    return ray;

look at line:


ray.dir = * cam.focalLength + vec3(1, 0, 0)*( float(x-(width/2)))*cam.pW
                              + * (float(y-(height/2))*cam.pH);

Basically you x and are unsigned integers, your width and height are also unsigned integers - so F.E. x - (width/2) when width/2 is larger than x is a problem - it's like subtracting 1 - 3 in unsigned ints, it doesn't give you back correct answer (thats -2) ... so either use ints instead of uints, or convert all uints to float before computing anything (hope I didn't forget bracket somewhere):


ray.dir = * cam.focalLength + vec3(1, 0, 0)*( float(x) - float(width/2))*cam.pW
                              + * ((float(y)-float(height/2))*cam.pH);

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
StanLee    157

Wow, first I felt baffled and now I feel stupid. :D
This gave me hours of desperation. I assumed everything from wrong initialization of my image up to driver bugs but didn't see this mistake.
Thank you very much! :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
    • By markshaw001
      Hi i am new to this forum  i wanted to ask for help from all of you i want to generate real time terrain using a 32 bit heightmap i am good at c++ and have started learning Opengl as i am very interested in making landscapes in opengl i have looked around the internet for help about this topic but i am not getting the hang of the concepts and what they are doing can some here suggests me some good resources for making terrain engine please for example like tutorials,books etc so that i can understand the whole concept of terrain generation.
    • By KarimIO
      Hey guys. I'm trying to get my application to work on my Nvidia GTX 970 desktop. It currently works on my Intel HD 3000 laptop, but on the desktop, every bind textures specifically from framebuffers, I get half a second of lag. This is done 4 times as I have three RGBA textures and one depth 32F buffer. I tried to use debugging software for the first time - RenderDoc only shows SwapBuffers() and no OGL calls, while Nvidia Nsight crashes upon execution, so neither are helpful. Without binding it runs regularly. This does not happen with non-framebuffer binds.
      GLFramebuffer::GLFramebuffer(FramebufferCreateInfo createInfo) { glGenFramebuffers(1, &fbo); glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); textures = new GLuint[createInfo.numColorTargets]; glGenTextures(createInfo.numColorTargets, textures); GLenum *DrawBuffers = new GLenum[createInfo.numColorTargets]; for (uint32_t i = 0; i < createInfo.numColorTargets; i++) { glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[i]); GLint internalFormat; GLenum format; TranslateFormats(createInfo.colorFormats[i], format, internalFormat); // returns GL_RGBA and GL_RGBA glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, internalFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, format, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); DrawBuffers[i] = GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i; glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i, textures[i], 0); } if (createInfo.depthFormat != FORMAT_DEPTH_NONE) { GLenum depthFormat; switch (createInfo.depthFormat) { case FORMAT_DEPTH_16: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8; break; } glGenTextures(1, &depthrenderbuffer); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, depthFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, depthrenderbuffer, 0); } if (createInfo.numColorTargets > 0) glDrawBuffers(createInfo.numColorTargets, DrawBuffers); else glDrawBuffer(GL_NONE); if (glCheckFramebufferStatus(GL_FRAMEBUFFER) != GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE) std::cout << "Framebuffer Incomplete\n"; glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, 0); width = createInfo.width; height = createInfo.height; } // ... // FBO Creation FramebufferCreateInfo gbufferCI; gbufferCI.colorFormats =; gbufferCI.depthFormat = FORMAT_DEPTH_32; gbufferCI.numColorTargets = gbufferCFs.size(); gbufferCI.width = engine.settings.resolutionX; gbufferCI.height = engine.settings.resolutionY; gbufferCI.renderPass = nullptr; gbuffer = graphicsWrapper->CreateFramebuffer(gbufferCI); // Bind glBindFramebuffer(GL_DRAW_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); // Draw here... // Bind to textures glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[1]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[2]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE3); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); Here is an extract of my code. I can't think of anything else to include. I've really been butting my head into a wall trying to think of a reason but I can think of none and all my research yields nothing. Thanks in advance!
    • By Adrianensis
      Hi everyone, I've shared my 2D Game Engine source code. It's the result of 4 years working on it (and I still continue improving features ) and I want to share with the community. You can see some videos on youtube and some demo gifs on my twitter account.
      This Engine has been developed as End-of-Degree Project and it is coded in Javascript, WebGL and GLSL. The engine is written from scratch.
      This is not a professional engine but it's for learning purposes, so anyone can review the code an learn basis about graphics, physics or game engine architecture. Source code on this GitHub repository.
      I'm available for a good conversation about Game Engine / Graphics Programming
    • By C0dR
      I would like to introduce the first version of my physically based camera rendering library, written in C++, called PhysiCam.
      Physicam is an open source OpenGL C++ library, which provides physically based camera rendering and parameters. It is based on OpenGL and designed to be used as either static library or dynamic library and can be integrated in existing applications.
      The following features are implemented:
      Physically based sensor and focal length calculation Autoexposure Manual exposure Lense distortion Bloom (influenced by ISO, Shutter Speed, Sensor type etc.) Bokeh (influenced by Aperture, Sensor type and focal length) Tonemapping  
      You can find the repository at
      I would be happy about feedback, suggestions or contributions.

  • Popular Now