Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Creating a simple 2d engine (C++), best way to create an Sprite class?

This topic is 1766 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Since MS announced that they are not give more support to XNA , for me was an opportunity to start to learn DirectX , so i wanted to learn DX11,

i was following this tutorials 

 

http://www.rastertek.com/tutdx11.html

 

i want to build a simple 2D engine while im learning with basic thing,like render an sprite based on a spritesheet, ,animate it, scale, rotation, flip image

 

I started creating some simple basic structure, 

- Engine Class, this hold the initialization of the Window basically

- RenderManager class, this hold all the DX stuff, initialize it, create the swapchain, store the device , etc

 

So now my next step is create the Sprite class , i wanted to create an method called "Quad2D" inside my RenderManager, so i can use it on my render method in my sprite class

 

//This is not actual code, is just oh i want to approach this
class Sprite{

public void Render(RenderManager *rm){
  
    rm->Quad2D(Texture,Position,Width,Height);

}
}

i have some experience with OpenGL and Directx9 , it was easy to approach this, i just need to create an Array with the vertex, send to the VertexBuffer, bind the Texture, and done, 

 

but because now DX10 and DX11 not used fixed pipeline, and you need create this with more advanced stuff (Shaders),

i stopped in here http://www.rastertek.com/dx11tut11.html , i can see how to render the image and everything, but i was thinking, do i need to create an separate Class just to render a Quad? if so, this is going to compile the shader everytime is used?, well one solution maybe is just declare an static atribute for the ps and vs to share the same compile shader

 

so i want to hear your suggestion, how do you manage your Sprite class? 

 

if it necessary, i can attach my source code, but it doesnt has too much, just open a window

 

Note: i want to know how to do it in DX11, please dont reply, (used DX9,OpenGL,DX10, etc..)

Edited by Joyal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create separate classes for Shaders, Vertex Buffers etc. 

 

 For example i have the following class for vertex shader:

class VertexShaderDX11
	{
	protected:

		ID3D11VertexShader*	m_pShader;
		InputAssemblerStateDX11*	m_pState;

	public:
		VertexShaderDX11()  { m_pState = new InputAssemblerStateDX11(); }
		~VertexShaderDX11() {	SAFE_RELEASE(m_pShader);
								SAFE_DELETE(m_pState); }

		ABOOL Create(BlobDX11 & shaderbuffer, INPUT_LAYOUT* layout, AUINT8 num,
										 AUINT16 topology);
		AVOID Set() const;
	};

 

Note that it has pointer to the InputAssembler structure (it stores information about Input Assembler stage as for vertex shader you have to have right input topology). 

 

 In your sprite class you can reference shader for rendering and bind it to the pipeline before you render your sprite. Don't recompile shader all the time! Compile it one time and then just have a pointer to an object of your shader class which stores compiled shader.  Multiple sprites can use single shader for rendering just having pointer to it.

Edited by DgekGD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm somewhat curious how your Quad2D method is handling things under the hood. Is it buffering the sprites and then drawing them in all one big draw call, sorting them by texture, or does each call set the texture, vertex buffers, IA Layout, shaders, etc? If it is the latter then it is likely to not be all that efficient. You may want to look into mimicking the way SpriteBatch in XNA handles things. You tell it to Begin() and then you do a number of Draw() calls. When you are finished you say End(), which draws all the sprites in one go. This approach is generally more efficient.

 

As for me, I store all my sprites as points in a dynamic vertex buffer and expand them to quads in the Geometry shader. This makes managing the vertex buffers on the C side much easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@DgekGD , i like your approach because i can use the same VS and PS in differents classes biggrin.png!

 

 

@Racoonacoon well right now i don`t have the implementation made of Quad2D on my current "Engine"(DX11), i wanted to ask before i do it because DX10-11 works different,  but i do have my DX9 version , 

 

void RenderManager::DrawQuad2D (CTexture* texture, Vector2 position, int w, int h)
{

	// position = [0] 
	//
	//  [0]------[2]
	//   |        |
	//   |        |
	//   |        |
	//  [1]------[3]
	
	Vector2 coord_text[4];
	coord_text[0].x = 0.f;	coord_text[0].y = 0.f;
	coord_text[1].x = 0.f;	coord_text[1].y = 1.f;
	coord_text[2].x = 1.f;	coord_text[2].y = 0.f;
	coord_text[3].x = 1.f;	coord_text[3].y = 1.f;
			
	unsigned short indices[6]={0,2,1,1,2,3};
	SCREEN_TEXTURE_VERTEX v[4] =
	{
			{ (float)position.x,	(float)position.y,	0.f,1.f, coord_text[0].x,	coord_text[0].y} //(x,y) sup_esq.
		,	{ (float)position.x,	(float)position.y+h,	0.f,1.f, coord_text[1].x,	coord_text[1].y} //(x,y) inf_esq.
		, 	{ (float)position.x+w,	(float)position.y,	0.f,1.f, coord_text[2].x,	coord_text[2].y} //(x,y) sup_dr.
		,	{ (float)position.x+w,	(float)position.y+h,	0.f,1.f, coord_text[3].x,	coord_text[3].y} //(x,y) inf_dr.
	};

	m_pD3DDevice->SetFVF( SCREEN_TEXTURE_VERTEX::getFlags() );
	m_pD3DDevice->SetTexture(0, texture->GetD3DXTexture() );
	m_pD3DDevice->DrawIndexedPrimitiveUP( D3DPT_TRIANGLELIST,0, 4, 2,indices,D3DFMT_INDEX16, v, sizeof( SCREEN_TEXTURE_VERTEX ) );
}

 

 

Well i based in your suggestion , i think i will do some sort of XNA's "SpriteBranch", and that class can be instantiated once, and be passed on the "Render" method,  instead of the "RenderManager", 

 

Thank for your greats advice 

Edited by Joyal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
  • Popular Now