Sign in to follow this  
Spykam22

What do you want in a Next Generation Console?

Recommended Posts

Spykam22    157

Hello Fellow Developers!

 

I am working on a product and was wondering what would you like to see in a next generation console?

 

Thanks,

Kammeron Randle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

 

Don't require server connections for single-player games.

 

Ease of use: Click 'download' on a game I purchased, and I boot up a different game while the first game downloads in the background.

Doesn't try to trick me: Don't make me buy your own currency. If I want to buy a $7.50 game, don't make me buy $10 worth of your money.

 

Any game available on disk should also be available for digital purchase (and buying a disk gives the digital version as well). I don't buy games at $60 or $50. If the game never decreases in price, I'm either going to buy it used (unfortunately giving you no money as a developer) or not buy it at all.

 

[minor change of topic]

 

This is why I buy on Steam. The people who want to play the game the second it comes out, they feel it's worth $60 to them - that doesn't mean it's worth $60 to everyone. After a year, it should be $40. After another year, $20. From time to time, it should go on sale for $10-15. That's when I'll pick it up... Not because I don't want developers to profit, but simply because very very few games are ever worth $60 to me personally. When I do buy a game for $15, then I want the money to go to the developers. By not decreasing the prices a reasonable amount over time, it's the developers (well, okay, the publishers) who drive customers to used-game sales and (worst case) to piracy.

 

The annual amount I spend on games? Less than $100 total. If your products aren't within my price range, then I won't buy your games, or I'll buy them used. I'm fine buying 4-year old games - but if you don't make them available to me (because once they stop selling, then you stop producing disks) then I can't buy them. Digital distribution has reduced your: A) disk manufacturing costs, B) distribution costs, C) middlemen costs. Instead of $50 dollar games decreasing in prices, they rose to $60 prices instead. huh.png Okay, so I'm oversimplifying, and ignoring rising game development costs, rising marketing costs, and the economic downturn. But if the economic downturn hurt studios so badly, how do you think they hurt consumers? The response should've been cutting costs, not raising prices, otherwise you drive more customers to used-sales and piracy.

 

I don't want $1 games on the iPhone either. Give me a happy middle. $10-$20 games (several years after release) for 10-20 hours of gameplay. No hidden fees and no monthly fees.

 

[/derail]

 

Other than that, lots of cooperative splitscreen games. I like local coop and local multiplayer.

Edited by Servant of the Lord

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sunandshadow    7426

Would it be unhelpful to say I really wish consoles would go away and all new games would come out for the PC...? unsure.png  Though, I wouldn't say no to a tablet phone (like a smart phone with a much bigger screen and a little usb gamepad and headphones, and I could read my ebooks on it while listening to my mp3s).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Promit    13246

I want familiar APIs and easy access to devkits. Also lots of memory.

 

Oh, and a userbase. Definitely need a userbase.

Edited by Promit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MarkS    3502

It would be nice if console manufacturers would stop thinking indie developers have cooties or whatever. We wont kill game sells by creating indie content.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spykam22    157

Hello Everyone!

 

Thanks, all the information you are providing is really helpful.

 

It would be nice if console manufacturers would stop thinking indie developers have cooties or whatever. We wont kill game sells by creating indie content.

 

I know right! This is not going to be the case with my product.  wink.png

 

 

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

 

Don't require server connections for single-player games.

 

Ease of use: Click 'download' on a game I purchased, and I boot up a different game while the first game downloads in the background.

Doesn't try to trick me: Don't make me buy your own currency. If I want to buy a $7.50 game, don't make me buy $10 worth of your money.

 

Any game available on disk should also be available for digital purchase (and buying a disk gives the digital version as well). I don't buy games at $60 or $50. If the game never decreases in price, I'm either going to buy it used (unfortunately giving you no money as a developer) or not buy it at all.

 

[minor change of topic]

 

This is why I buy on Steam. The people who want to play the game the second it comes out, they feel it's worth $60 to them - that doesn't mean it's worth $60 to everyone. After a year, it should be $40. After another year, $20. From time to time, it should go on sale for $10-15. That's when I'll pick it up... Not because I don't want developers to profit, but simply because very very few games are ever worth $60 to me personally. When I do buy a game for $15, then I want the money to go to the developers. By not decreasing the prices a reasonable amount over time, it's the developers (well, okay, the publishers) who drive customers to used-game sales and (worst case) to piracy.

 

The annual amount I spend on games? Less than $100 total. If your products aren't within my price range, then I won't buy your games, or I'll buy them used. I'm fine buying 4-year old games - but if you don't make them available to me (because once they stop selling, then you stop producing disks) then I can't buy them. Digital distribution has reduced your: A) disk manufacturing costs, B) distribution costs, C) middlemen costs. Instead of $50 dollar games decreasing in prices, they rose to $60 prices instead. huh.png Okay, so I'm oversimplifying, and ignoring rising game development costs, rising marketing costs, and the economic downturn. But if the economic downturn hurt studios so badly, how do you think they hurt consumers? The response should've been cutting costs, not raising prices, otherwise you drive more customers to used-sales and piracy.

 

I don't want $1 games on the iPhone either. Give me a happy middle. $10-$20 games (several years after release) for 10-20 hours of gameplay. No hidden fees and no monthly fees.

 

[/derail]

 

Other than that, lots of cooperative splitscreen games. I like local coop and local multiplayer.

 

Great info and ideas. smile.png

 

< $ 300, API for indies, indies channel, keep it an offline console

 

You read my mind for the most part. biggrin.png  Thanks. smile.png

 

 

I want familiar APIs and easy access to devkits. Also lots of memory.

 

Oh, and a userbase. Definitely need a userbase.

 

Thanks! Trust me, it will have lots of memory. wink.png

 

Lots of good games.


Beyond that... who cares, really?

 

Thanks smile.png

 

The ability to use the consumer version as a dev-kit would be my 'must have' feature.

 

Thanks smile.png

 

Thanks again! Continue to leave replies about what you would want to see in a next generation console. Kickstarter coming soon. wink.png 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha_ProgDes    6921

Probably the capacity to install a regular Linux distro on it (Debian for example). One can never have enough cheap Linux systems around biggrin.png

 

I'd be surprised if this console is not similar to Ouya (which has Android which is a Linux.... as you may already know).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TheChubu    9446

I dunno how possible is to install a regular (ie, not Android) distro on the Ouya.

 

Anyway I mean't a more-or-less supported way to install a Linux distro on the device rather than just "Hack your way through it, we'll look the other side"

 

I've seen other distros installed on Android based devices but the procedure is not as easy as installing it on a desktop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
way2lazy2care    790

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

Just out of curiousity, how would you feel about a $15-$30 subscription that gives you access to any game at any time, but you don't own the games if you stop subscribing?

I think it would be interesting if consoles opened up more ways for monetization. A lot of people think f2p is dirty, but I would love to see what might happen if f2p was allowed to exist. I think if the console manufacturers were still involved you could get some really high quality f2p games on the console without as much of the trash. Mostly I'm just interested in more viable models than what exists now; unlike phones where you have to be more democratic, consoles could keep a really high quality bar for their different models.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GeneralQuery    1263

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

Just out of curiousity, how would you feel about a $15-$30 subscription that gives you access to any game at any time, but you don't own the games if you stop subscribing?

The problem with this model is how does one divide up the subscription in terms of royalties, especially for such a small amount?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

Just out of curiousity, how would you feel about a $15-$30 subscription that gives you access to any game at any time, but you don't own the games if you stop subscribing?

OnLive's model? I think it's a good idea. I do the same thing with Netflix - I don't own any of the movies I watch, I just pay a monthly fee and access them as much as I want.

The problem is, it'd have to have the games I want for me to be interested, and live-streaming is most conducive to online multiplayer gaming (because the servers and the clients would run in the same datacenter), and unlikely to support many split-screen or local multiplayer games, which is what I enjoy most.

I recently started playing League of Legends, but I play it with one or two of my siblings sitting a few feet away from me on their laptops. It's just so much more fun that way for me.
I greatly enjoyed playing the old Halo games split-screen coop, and local multiplayer. Online multiplayer, while fun, was a different experience and just wasn't a good enough experience to be worth my time. I've played some of the Modern Warfare games online, just myself, and they're fun, but what I really enjoy (as a rather anti-social individual) is the social experience of playing with friends and family either competitively, or even better, cooperatively.

I think MMO subscriptions should be shared, though. Maybe two or three companies, each with a small MMO or two, unable to compete with World of Warcraft, let anyone subscribed to one of the games, play the others as well using the same account and subscription. $15 a month, and you can log into any one of 5 or 6 different MMOs of wildly different natures? If the user spends 75 hours online that month, his $15 is divided between whichever MMOs he played, based on how long he played. I think it'll be a viable strategy for smaller studios (50-200 employees) working together.

 

I think it would be interesting if consoles opened up more ways for monetization. A lot of people think f2p is dirty, but I would love to see what might happen if f2p was allowed to exist. I think if the console manufacturers were still involved you could get some really high quality f2p games on the console without as much of the trash.

Sony is permitting it with CPP's (maker of Eve Online) Dust 514 online FPS. It will be free-to-play, PS3/PS4 exclusive, and interacts with players playing Eve Online on the PC, but hasn't yet been released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kseh    3838

Just out of curiousity, how would you feel about a $15-$30 subscription that gives you access to any game at any time, but you don't own the games if you stop subscribing?

 

I haven't tried OnLive but I did this for awhile with shockwave.com. For quite a few years I felt like it was worth it then it seemed like the quality of the games started going down hill. Or maybe I felt like nothing innovative was coming out. I kinda also remember it being hard to search for games that interested me. Whatever it was, they didn't have games I wanted to play anymore and what they did have that caught my interest could be found on other flash sites for free. It was great for awhile and was how I found World of Goo, Diner Dash (original), and Plant Tycoon. Quite a few others as well. Probably not likely to do it again more because of gaming time being more limited these days.

 

I don't buy games at $60 or $50. If the game never decreases in price, I'm either going to buy it used (unfortunately giving you no money as a developer) or not buy it at all.

 

Personally, I don't mind paying > $50 for a game but when I'm done I had better feel like the game has enriched my life in the way that my English teachers had hoped that reading Shakespeare would. If I know that a game isn't going to do that then maybe somewhere around the $10 mark works for me.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TheChubu    9446

 

Ownership of my games: Either DRM-free, so I can copy them, or at the very least, future versions of the same console shouldn't make me repurchase the same downloadable games.

Just out of curiousity, how would you feel about a $15-$30 subscription that gives you access to any game at any time, but you don't own the games if you stop subscribing?

The problem with this model is how does one divide up the subscription in terms of royalties, especially for such a small amount?

My guess, a monthly payment based on how many players played your game that month. Or more accurately, how many hours your game has been played that month.

 

Though you'd probably be running the whole thing at a loss for a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
way2lazy2care    790

Quite a few others as well. Probably not likely to do it again more because of gaming time being more limited these days.

I actually like it specifically because my game time is limited. As much as I wish I could play all the games as much as I want, I often either lost interest or want to move to something else.

I was thinking more like gamefly originally, but yea I guess it's similar to onlive as well or netflix. What I had in mind was probably closer to playstation plus, but yea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ravyne    14300

It would be nice if console manufacturers would stop thinking indie developers have cooties or whatever. We wont kill game sells by creating indie content.

 

Its frankly not the console manufacturers that are worried about it, its the publishers who threaten to take their ball and go home if they give indies too much sway--that's what worries the manufacturers.

 

The reality, of course is that there's plenty of room for both large and small titles to exist and to thrive, but the established powers in any market never like ceding away any of their power, and most are paranoid-delusional about masses of nimble, unknown competitors because its such a foreign concept that they haven't any idea of what to expect or how to respond.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
boolean    1829

It would be nice if console manufacturers would stop thinking indie developers have cooties or whatever. We wont kill game sells by creating indie content.

 

I think that's what was so impressive about seeing Jonathan Blow on stage during the PS4 unveiling. I mean stop and think about it - This is the launch of a new device that has millions of dollars behind it, it's trying to get off on the best foot for a 10 year cycle, it's trying to impress gamers enough that their console is better than any other console and worth buying...and they demo it with The Witness? Next to the new Killzone? Crazy!

 

 

I think that Microsoft has managed to ruin their relationship with all the indie developers (eg. Edmund, Jonathan) enough that Sony is trying to capitalize on it. So far it seems to be working.

 

So, I hope that indie gaming is supported strongly on the next consoles. I probably spent 80% of my Xbox time on Xbox Live games, so if Sony can give proper support to indie gamers that would be awesome.

Edited by boolean

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tstrimp    1798

I think that Microsoft has managed to ruin their relationship with all the indie developers (eg. Edmund, Jonathan) enough that Sony is trying to capitalize on it. So far it seems to be working.

 

I haven't been paying attention here. What was done to ruin relationships? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
_the_phantom_    11250
At a guess this refers to the whole 'zomg! Windows 8 store! It r the closed and evil!' stuff which was kicking about around Win8's launch.

Thing is I suspect out of the two companies MS will be the first to put up a 'broad access' development system like XNA; the next Xbox is more than likely going to be running the Windows 8 kernel which means that, like the phones, it'll likely have sandboxed C++ ability (just without the battery sucking power ability) so I suspect that much like Windows Phone 8 and WinRT/Modern UI apps before it a $99/year dev for the Xbox option using familiar APIs might well open up after launch.

I don't see it being an XNA type thing, just along the lines of what we have now for the tablet, phone and MUI apps - which makes sense if you consider that MS basically want to get everything connected which means more people are likely to buy into their stuff. Edited by phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
boolean    1829

At a guess this refers to the whole 'zomg! Windows 8 store! It r the closed and evil!' stuff which was kicking about around Win8's launch.

 

Not so much the Windows8 stuff, but from the stories of indie developers being treated poorly when developing for the Xbox. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hodgman    51223

At a guess this refers to the whole 'zomg! Windows 8 store! It r the closed and evil!' stuff which was kicking about around Win8's launch.

 

Not so much the Windows8 stuff, but from the stories of indie developers being treated poorly when developing for the Xbox. 

To be fair, that's not indies being treated poorly as such, it's just them being treated the same as any other developer. All developers (big or small) are expected to fork over tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege of being on a console... This is the same across 360 and PS3 at the moment.

 

[edit]And from what Sony has said so far, it's not going to change on the PS4 -- yes they've mentioned 'self publishing', but this is a service for companies that have gone through the registered developer program

Edited by Hodgman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this