• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Bumped cubemap aliasing

This topic is 1768 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I've noticed a lot of shimmering coming from shading, especially from specular and environment maps used together with normal maps, and I really really want to fix it some way.

 

The best solution I found on topic is this (because of simplicity and low performance hit): http://blog.selfshadow.com/2011/07/22/specular-showdown/

 

These Toksvig maps gave me kind of acceptable results with blinn-phong:

Without: http://oi48.tinypic.com/mlmfia.jpg

With: http://oi49.tinypic.com/346vnvd.jpg

 

However, I'm still struggling with getting them work with cubemaps. Original Toksvig paper has a little advice, saying "This effect can be modeled by computing lod for the environment map as a function of log2(some_greek_letter)", but it's not really helpful.

Anyway, we can vary the size of specular highlights, but we are still a bit limited with envmaps, because we only have a discrete number of mips and a linear interpolation between them - and I think, this limitation can break some theory behind Toksvig AA (or maybe I'm wrong).

I tried different ways to use Toksvig factor in texCUBElod, but no success, I have either aliasing or everything is just totally blurred.

 

Aliased: http://oi46.tinypic.com/2961zlv.jpg

(1-Toksvig)*numMips as lod: http://oi47.tinypic.com/344fm6v.jpg

 

And here is the best version, just brutally supersampled cubemap inside shader (11 fetches): http://oi46.tinypic.com/1679sf7.jpg

But it's a huge performance hit!

 

Is it possible to get that supersampled quality, only exploiting mips and not relying on heavy amounts of fetches?

 

Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Well, I actually quoted this link as "original Toksvig paper" in my first post, it's clickable there )

---

OK, I think then it should be log2(toksvigFactor * p), where p is kind of specular power for biggest mip level (as if it contains specular highlights). As I use Modified CubemapGen for cubemaps generation, I even know excatly this number (it's named "cosine power" there).

But results are still disappointing: http://oi50.tinypic.com/hv782f.jpg

Edited by Mr_F_

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement