• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
kamimail

The Problems about the FPS Camera

5 posts in this topic

Hi,every one,

   I am a novice in the 3D math.currently , I am tortured by a problem about the rotation of a FPS camera.hope someone can help me .

   please allow me to assume that the discussion is based on OpenGL conversion.

   suppose the FPS camera is placed at the initial state in which the three axis of camera are aligned with axis of world frame.

 

   I firstly pitch the camera around the x axis of world frame, and then yaw the camera around the y axis of world frame.so I can get the following equation(column-major) : 

   camera_orientation_matrix_1 = yaw_yworld_matrix * pitch_xworld_matrix =  rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle);

 

   some reference  informs me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

   so I firstly yaw the camera with local y axis of camera, then pitch the camera around the local x axis of the camrea.

ie: camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

 

   since the  camera_orientation_matrix_1 equals camera_orientation_matrix _2, I derive the following:

        rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle) === rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

  but the above equation is a fallacy,Is there anyone can tell me where is wrong? Thanks! smile.png

Edited by kamimail
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,every one,

   I am a novice in the 3D math.currently , I am tortured by a problem about the rotation of a FPS camera.hope someone can help me .

   please allow me to assume that the discussion is based on OpenGL conversion.

   suppose the FPS camera is placed at the initial state in which the three axis of camera are aligned with axis of world frame.

 

   I firstly pitch the camera around the x axis of world frame, and then yaw the camera around the y axis of world frame.so I can get the following equation(column-major) : 

   camera_orientation_matrix_1 = yaw_yworld_matrix * pitch_xworld_matrix =  rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle);

 

   some reference  informed me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

   so I firstly yaw the camera with local y axis of camera, then pitch the camera around the local x axis of the camrea.

ie: camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

 

   since the  camera_orientation_matrix_1 equals camera_orientation_matrix _2, I derive the following:

        rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle) === rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

  but the above equation is a fallacy,Is there anyone can tell me where is wrong? Thanks! smile.png

 

From Wikipedia (general case): For n greater than 2, multiplication of n×n rotation matrices is not commutative.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

some reference informed me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

I think that this is some kind of missinterpretation. E.g. use an OO camera model, then you could do the following:

Camera.reset();
Camera.rotateAroundLocalY(yaw);
Camera.rotateAroundLocalX(pitch);

The trick is, that you rotate the second time around a modified axis (local axis) which no longer equals the global X axis, therefor you can't just use a rotateX matrix which uses the global axis. That's the reason your assumption

camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

is wrong.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
#2

 

 

Hi,every one,

   I am a novice in the 3D math.currently , I am tortured by a problem about the rotation of a FPS camera.hope someone can help me .

   please allow me to assume that the discussion is based on OpenGL conversion.

   suppose the FPS camera is placed at the initial state in which the three axis of camera are aligned with axis of world frame.

 

   I firstly pitch the camera around the x axis of world frame, and then yaw the camera around the y axis of world frame.so I can get the following equation(column-major) : 

   camera_orientation_matrix_1 = yaw_yworld_matrix * pitch_xworld_matrix =  rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle);

 

   some reference  informed me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

   so I firstly yaw the camera with local y axis of camera, then pitch the camera around the local x axis of the camrea.

ie: camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

 

   since the  camera_orientation_matrix_1 equals camera_orientation_matrix _2, I derive the following:

        rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle) === rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

  but the above equation is a fallacy,Is there anyone can tell me where is wrong? Thanks! smile.png

 

From Wikipedia (general case): For n greater than 2, multiplication of n×n rotation matrices is not commutative.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix

Hi, Ravnock, thanks for your reply.

I don't know where is wrong in my above inference.hope someone can pinpoint it to me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,every one,

   I am a novice in the 3D math.currently , I am tortured by a problem about the rotation of a FPS camera.hope someone can help me .

   please allow me to assume that the discussion is based on OpenGL conversion.

   suppose the FPS camera is placed at the initial state in which the three axis of camera are aligned with axis of world frame.

 

   I firstly pitch the camera around the x axis of world frame, and then yaw the camera around the y axis of world frame.so I can get the following equation(column-major) : 

   camera_orientation_matrix_1 = yaw_yworld_matrix * pitch_xworld_matrix =  rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle);

 

   some reference  informed me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

   so I firstly yaw the camera with local y axis of camera, then pitch the camera around the local x axis of the camrea.

ie: camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

 

   since the  camera_orientation_matrix_1 equals camera_orientation_matrix _2, I derive the following:

        rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle) === rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

  but the above equation is a fallacy,Is there anyone can tell me where is wrong? Thanks! smile.png

 

From Wikipedia (general case): For n greater than 2, multiplication of n×n rotation matrices is not commutative.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix

Though this is not a proof, that a certain sub-set of nxn matrices is not commutative. E.g. the set of all pure homogenes 4x4 translation matrices are commutative.

Hehe, the above statement is at least a proof, that I fail to read carefully a post sometimes rolleyes.gif

Edited by Ashaman73
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Hi,every one,

   I am a novice in the 3D math.currently , I am tortured by a problem about the rotation of a FPS camera.hope someone can help me .

   please allow me to assume that the discussion is based on OpenGL conversion.

   suppose the FPS camera is placed at the initial state in which the three axis of camera are aligned with axis of world frame.

 

   I firstly pitch the camera around the x axis of world frame, and then yaw the camera around the y axis of world frame.so I can get the following equation(column-major) : 

   camera_orientation_matrix_1 = yaw_yworld_matrix * pitch_xworld_matrix =  rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle);

 

   some reference  informed me that I can get the same orientation by using the local rotation matrix but applied in a reverse order.

   so I firstly yaw the camera with local y axis of camera, then pitch the camera around the local x axis of the camrea.

ie: camera_orientation_matrix _2 = pitch_xlocal_matrix * yaw_ylocal_matrix = rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

 

   since the  camera_orientation_matrix_1 equals camera_orientation_matrix _2, I derive the following:

        rotateY(yaw_angle)  *  rotateX(pitch_angle) === rotateX(pitch_angle) * rotateY(yaw_angle) ;

  but the above equation is a fallacy,Is there anyone can tell me where is wrong? Thanks! smile.png

 

From Wikipedia (general case): For n greater than 2, multiplication of n×n rotation matrices is not commutative.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix

Hi, Ravnock, thanks for your reply.

I don't know where is wrong in my above inference.hope someone can pinpoint it to me.

 

I have not idea about OpenGL but I use to build my rotation matrix with the D3DXMatrixLookAtRH function, I think gluLookAt it's similar. You set where you are, where are you looking at and the up axis, for a FPS is everything you need...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0