Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Sphere/Cylinder mapping with OpenGL

This topic is 1752 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi All
 
I need spherical/cylindrical map for arbitrary objects (not a reflection mapping). Actually I'm calculating UV manually. If a polygon crosses UV seam or pole, then I split it into several new polygons. It works but it's a big piece of code that makes app much slower. Are there better ways with OpenGL?
 
Thanks
Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbh, I don't know the exact algorithms used to do this, but I have managed to do this (at least the spherical) in OpenGL by copying some code from the DirectX 9 SDK (the older ones)  and changing the necessary features to work for OpenGL.  It's been years since I've done this so I can't remember exactly what I changed for the sphere, but it should be obvious enough IMO.

 

Here's the sphere: 

// Establish constants used in sphere generation
    DWORD dwNumSphereRings    = m_bHighTesselation ? 15 :  5;
    DWORD dwNumSphereSegments = m_bHighTesselation ? 30 : 10;
    FLOAT fDeltaRingAngle = ( D3DX_PI / dwNumSphereRings );
    FLOAT fDeltaSegAngle  = ( 2.0f * D3DX_PI / dwNumSphereSegments );

    D3DXVECTOR4 vT;
    FLOAT fScale;

    // Generate the group of rings for the sphere
    for( DWORD ring = 0; ring < (dwNumSphereRings/2); ring++ )
    {
        FLOAT r0 = sinf( (ring+0) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT r1 = sinf( (ring+1) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT y0 = cosf( (ring+0) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT y1 = cosf( (ring+1) * fDeltaRingAngle );

        // Generate the group of segments for the current ring
        for( DWORD seg = 0; seg < (dwNumSphereSegments+1); seg++ )
        {
            FLOAT x0 =  r0 * sinf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT z0 =  r0 * cosf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT x1 =  r1 * sinf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT z1 =  r1 * cosf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );

            // Add two vertices to the strip which makes up the sphere
            // (using the transformed normal to generate texture coords)
            (*vtx).p   = (*vtx).n   = D3DXVECTOR3(x0,y0,z0);
            D3DXVec3Transform( &vT, &(*vtx).n, &matWorldView );
            fScale = 1.37f / D3DXVec4Length( &vT );
            (*vtx).tu1 = 0.5f + fScale*vT.x;
            (*vtx).tv1 = 0.5f - fScale*vT.y;
            vtx++;

            (*vtx).p   = (*vtx).n   = D3DXVECTOR3(x1,y1,z1);
            D3DXVec3Transform( &vT, &(*vtx).n, &matWorldView );
            fScale = 1.37f / D3DXVec4Length( &vT );
            (*vtx).tu1 = 0.5f + fScale*vT.x;
            (*vtx).tv1 = 0.5f - fScale*vT.y;
            vtx++;
        }
    }

 

Then draw as a triangle strip.  You'll have to use your own matrix transformation and vector length functions to do the texture coordinates, but that shouldn't be hard.

 

The cylinder is much easier.  I don't know if you want an open or closed cylinder, I've never done the latter.

for( DWORD i=0; i<50; i++ )
    {
        FLOAT theta = (2*D3DX_PI*i)/(50-1);

        pVertices[2*i+0].position = D3DXVECTOR3( sinf(theta),-1.0f, cosf(theta) );
        pVertices[2*i+0].color    = 0xffffffff;
        pVertices[2*i+0].tu       = ((FLOAT)i)/(50-1);
        pVertices[2*i+0].tv       = 1.0f;

        pVertices[2*i+1].position = D3DXVECTOR3( sinf(theta), 1.0f, cosf(theta) );
        pVertices[2*i+1].color    = 0xff808080;
        pVertices[2*i+1].tu       = ((FLOAT)i)/(50-1);
        pVertices[2*i+1].tv       = 0.0f;
    }

 

Then draw as a triangle strip.  This example uses 100 vertices btw.

 

Not sure if this helped, but I tried. smile.png

 

Shogun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

blueshougun96. thx for your reply. I've no problems with UV calculation itself, my question was about "should I do that" or, in other words. "can I avoid manual UV calcs?". An answer "no, you can't"  would be also informative for me, if so I'm doing things right

 

Thanks

Tom

Edited by Tommato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, my mistake.  

 

Generally speaking, it should be fine, that's what I'd do.  I don't know of any way to do it automatically, unless OpenGL has an equivalent of D3DTSS_TCI_x.  

 

Shogun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

  • Popular Now