Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Sphere/Cylinder mapping with OpenGL

Recommended Posts

Tommato    237
Hi All
I need spherical/cylindrical map for arbitrary objects (not a reflection mapping). Actually I'm calculating UV manually. If a polygon crosses UV seam or pole, then I split it into several new polygons. It works but it's a big piece of code that makes app much slower. Are there better ways with OpenGL?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
blueshogun96    2264

Tbh, I don't know the exact algorithms used to do this, but I have managed to do this (at least the spherical) in OpenGL by copying some code from the DirectX 9 SDK (the older ones)  and changing the necessary features to work for OpenGL.  It's been years since I've done this so I can't remember exactly what I changed for the sphere, but it should be obvious enough IMO.


Here's the sphere: 

// Establish constants used in sphere generation
    DWORD dwNumSphereRings    = m_bHighTesselation ? 15 :  5;
    DWORD dwNumSphereSegments = m_bHighTesselation ? 30 : 10;
    FLOAT fDeltaRingAngle = ( D3DX_PI / dwNumSphereRings );
    FLOAT fDeltaSegAngle  = ( 2.0f * D3DX_PI / dwNumSphereSegments );

    FLOAT fScale;

    // Generate the group of rings for the sphere
    for( DWORD ring = 0; ring < (dwNumSphereRings/2); ring++ )
        FLOAT r0 = sinf( (ring+0) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT r1 = sinf( (ring+1) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT y0 = cosf( (ring+0) * fDeltaRingAngle );
        FLOAT y1 = cosf( (ring+1) * fDeltaRingAngle );

        // Generate the group of segments for the current ring
        for( DWORD seg = 0; seg < (dwNumSphereSegments+1); seg++ )
            FLOAT x0 =  r0 * sinf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT z0 =  r0 * cosf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT x1 =  r1 * sinf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );
            FLOAT z1 =  r1 * cosf( seg * fDeltaSegAngle );

            // Add two vertices to the strip which makes up the sphere
            // (using the transformed normal to generate texture coords)
            (*vtx).p   = (*vtx).n   = D3DXVECTOR3(x0,y0,z0);
            D3DXVec3Transform( &vT, &(*vtx).n, &matWorldView );
            fScale = 1.37f / D3DXVec4Length( &vT );
            (*vtx).tu1 = 0.5f + fScale*vT.x;
            (*vtx).tv1 = 0.5f - fScale*vT.y;

            (*vtx).p   = (*vtx).n   = D3DXVECTOR3(x1,y1,z1);
            D3DXVec3Transform( &vT, &(*vtx).n, &matWorldView );
            fScale = 1.37f / D3DXVec4Length( &vT );
            (*vtx).tu1 = 0.5f + fScale*vT.x;
            (*vtx).tv1 = 0.5f - fScale*vT.y;


Then draw as a triangle strip.  You'll have to use your own matrix transformation and vector length functions to do the texture coordinates, but that shouldn't be hard.


The cylinder is much easier.  I don't know if you want an open or closed cylinder, I've never done the latter.

for( DWORD i=0; i<50; i++ )
        FLOAT theta = (2*D3DX_PI*i)/(50-1);

        pVertices[2*i+0].position = D3DXVECTOR3( sinf(theta),-1.0f, cosf(theta) );
        pVertices[2*i+0].color    = 0xffffffff;
        pVertices[2*i+0].tu       = ((FLOAT)i)/(50-1);
        pVertices[2*i+0].tv       = 1.0f;

        pVertices[2*i+1].position = D3DXVECTOR3( sinf(theta), 1.0f, cosf(theta) );
        pVertices[2*i+1].color    = 0xff808080;
        pVertices[2*i+1].tu       = ((FLOAT)i)/(50-1);
        pVertices[2*i+1].tv       = 0.0f;


Then draw as a triangle strip.  This example uses 100 vertices btw.


Not sure if this helped, but I tried. smile.png



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tommato    237

blueshougun96. thx for your reply. I've no problems with UV calculation itself, my question was about "should I do that" or, in other words. "can I avoid manual UV calcs?". An answer "no, you can't"  would be also informative for me, if so I'm doing things right




Edited by Tommato

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now