Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
IronNerd

OpenGL Real-Time Tessellation Techniques of Note?

This topic is 1875 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I've been working on learning OpenGL 4.3 tessellation and compute shaders for a while now.  In the process, I've been learning and implementing several different tessellation techniques for meshes (tri+quad).  When I'm done, I plan on writing an article which compares their relative merits and possibly implementation guides for some of the less straightforward methods.  I've implemented a couple, am working on more, and would like further suggestions.

 

So Far:

If anybody can think of more techniques or variants of note, please let me know so I can add them to my list.  I'm especially interested in techniques that have seen or are likely to see use in real games.

Edited by IronNerd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Never seen anyone actually use Catmull/Clark, and there are good reasons not to. Phong tesselation is basically a useless smoothing hack that most artists I know despise "you're ruining my model, what are you doing!" Same with PN from what I'm looking at.

 

Displacement maps are almost always what's used, as far as such things are used anyway (just getting started relatively). They give artists full control (small imprecisions aside) and thus is the most useful thing to do for most situations. Artists want people to see what they themselves are looking at in Z-Brush or whatever modeling program they use, and they don't want to have to guess what some bloated smoothing thing is going to do to their carefully sculpted models.

Edited by Frenetic Pony

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never seen anyone actually use Catmull/Clark, and there are good reasons not to. Phong tesselation is basically a useless smoothing hack that most artists I know despise "you're ruining my model, what are you doing!" Same with PN from what I'm looking at.

 

Displacement maps are almost always what's used, as far as such things are used anyway (just getting started relatively). They give artists full control (small imprecisions aside) and thus is the most useful thing to do for most situations. Artists want people to see what they themselves are looking at in Z-Brush or whatever modeling program they use, and they don't want to have to guess what some bloated smoothing thing is going to do to their carefully sculpted models.

Could you share your impressions with tessellation performance and scaling?I haven't fully integrated it yet into my engine, since I fear it might really hurt me, aspecially when I need multiple geometry passes.Then again I'm doing it on an old laptop, maybe the newer desktops have better tessellation units that can cope with this kind of stuff.Still, it "burns" me in the brain.

I found this on another topic http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7639252.pdf it seems really efficient for the actual tessellation part, however the displacement always kills my performance when I experiment with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the model editor can preview the result while editing (like my own editor), normal based tessellation is not so terrible since it feels like drawing triangle patches and only require geometry shaders on DirectX 10 hardware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me the next standard for characters, weapons and important landmark will be catmull-clark with this solution :

 

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cloop/tog2012.pdf with this update for crease edges http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cloop/EG2012.pdf

 

This is the research and fundation of the opensubdiv initiative from pixar ( open subdiv do not yet have everything done, but the paper is enough to write your own implementation ).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"you're ruining my model, what are you doing!"
Artists want people to see what they themselves are looking at in whatever modeling program they use, and they don't want to have to guess what some bloated smoothing thing is going to do to their carefully sculpted models.

This is a workflow issue rather than a problem with any particular technique. The artists need to have these tesselation options available in their modeling tools, and an exact implementation in the engine too. Then if they model something using catmull-Clark surfaces, it will just work, and look exactly as they expect.

You simply can't take a low-poly model and tesselate it while retaining the artists ideas, in general. They need to have this expressive control, either by directl modeling with some flavour(s) of subdiv surfaces, or by giving you a high-poly 'target' model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cloop/tog2012.pdf with this update for crease edges http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cloop/EG2012.pdf

Thanks!  I'm working on an implementation of the first paper (and know about opensubdiv), but didn't realize that they had expanded upon it.  I'll have to read that paper tonight.  Do you know of any further research in that area?

 

You simply can't take a low-poly model and tesselate it while retaining the artists ideas, in general. They need to have this expressive control, either by directl modeling with some flavour(s) of subdiv surfaces, or by giving you a high-poly 'target' model.

When I do my final evaluation of each scheme, I should probably look at which ones are supported in modeling software and how hard it would be to add support for the ones that aren't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far tessellation uptake is extremely low. This is both because of low hardware penetration (it's not available on a console yet, most PC users don't have a DX11-level GPU) and because it's both expensive and difficult to use effectively. PN Triangles and Phong tessellation are pretty similar, and aren't terribly useful. They can improve the look of certain organic shapes but they require a lot of tuning to get right, and possibly per-vertex parameters. I haven't heard of anybody even being interested in Catmull-Clark or subdivision surfaces in general. It's not a good match for existing artist workflow, and you Catmull-Clark surfaces can't even be fully implemented on DX11 hardware since the algorithm is recursive. Displacement mapping is probably the most useful on paper, but in practice it has a lot of issues that need to be worked around. Avoiding cracks at UV seams is particularly expensive, since you need to guarantee consistent tessellation factors across all adjacent patches.

There are also some special-case situations where tessellation can be used (terrain, water, and hair come to mind) but I'm guessing that you're interested in that?

Edited by MJP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought PN triangle tesselation was quite useful for characters ? At least crytek has been using it in their engine for characters (or at least their heads wink.png ) afaik.

In my own little test it also seemed to look quite nice. The only problem I had was cracks. Had to disable it and haven't picked up on that since then...so I'd also be interested to know why it fails in your opinions ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far tessellation uptake is extremely low. This is both because of low hardware penetration (it's not available on a console yet, most PC users don't have a DX11-level GPU) and because it's both expensive and difficult to use effectively. PN Triangles and Phong tessellation are pretty similar, and aren't terribly useful. They can improve the look of certain organic shapes but they require a lot of tuning to get right, and possibly per-vertex parameters. I haven't heard of anybody even being interested in Catmull-Clark or subdivision surfaces in general. It's not a good match for existing artist workflow, and you Catmull-Clark surfaces can't even be fully implemented on DX11 hardware since the algorithm is recursive. Displacement mapping is probably the most useful on paper, but in practice it has a lot of issues that need to be worked around. Avoiding cracks at UV seams is particularly expensive, since you need to guarantee consistent tessellation factors across all adjacent patches.

There are also some special-case situations where tessellation can be used (terrain, water, and hair come to mind) but I'm guessing that you're interested in that?

I'm mostly interested in it as a thesis area.  So long as I can assume that the general PC user will have it in 5 years, its fair game on my end.  I'm beginning to notice why Phong and PN tessellation aren't well liked.  It seems like they may have a place, but they aren't very general purpose.

 

Catmull-Clark surfaces (and many other subdivision schemes) converge to an analytically obtainable limit surface which can be represented as a network of bicubic bezier patches. The "Feature Adaptive GPU Rendering of Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surfaces" and "Ef?cient Evaluation of Semi-Smooth Creases in Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surfaces" papers address their realtime performance quite well and it looks fairly promising.  I'm admittedly not familiar enough with render budgets to know how good 1-2ms is for a car, but it seems good enough to me.  My only comparison point right now is 3.4ms on the same model card for Valve's displacement mapped monster frog model; a rather unfair comparison.

 

I've been looking into eliminating seams in displacement maps recently.  I located a paper (http://lgdv.cs.fau.de/get/1682) which appears to have found an interesting solution.  They eliminate the seams by natively storing the data along with the mesh.  The results look promising to me, but their indexing scheme and cache coherency leave something to be desired.  If I could find a better indexing scheme, it might be well suited for games (as it also solves the swimming problem).  I'd be interested in hearing what you think about it.

 

I'm actually interested in basically every use of tessellation in games right now, though I have started with surfaces.  If you could point me to any good sources for terrain, water, or hair, that would be awesome :)

 

I thought PN triangle tesselation was quite useful for characters ? At least crytek has been using it in their engine for characters (or at least their heads wink.png ) afaik.

In my own little test it also seemed to look quite nice. The only problem I had was cracks. Had to disable it and haven't picked up on that since then...so I'd also be interested to know why it fails in your opinions ?

That does seem to be one of the better uses for it.  It really fails when you want a surface without smooth normals.  

 

Once I've worked the algorithmic bugs out of my algorithms so far, I haven't seen any cracks... If you want, I can post my PN shaders (GLSL) when I'm done with them. My standard license is WTFPL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Similar Content

    • By nOoNEE
      i am reading this book : link
      in the OpenGL Rendering Pipeline section there is a picture like this: link
      but the question is this i dont really understand why it is necessary to turn pixel data in to fragment and then fragment into pixel could please give me a source or a clear Explanation that why it is necessary ? thank you so mu
       
       
    • By Inbar_xz
      I'm using the OPENGL with eclipse+JOGL.
      My goal is to create movement of the camera and the player.
      I create main class, which create some box in 3D and hold 
      an object of PlayerAxis.
      I create PlayerAxis class which hold the axis of the player.
      If we want to move the camera, then in the main class I call to 
      the func "cameraMove"(from PlayerAxis) and it update the player axis.
      That's work good.
      The problem start if I move the camera on 2 axis, 
      for example if I move with the camera right(that's on the y axis)
      and then down(on the x axis) -
      in some point the move front is not to the front anymore..
      In order to move to the front, I do
      player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1);
      And I learn that in order to keep the front move, 
      I need to convert (0, 0, 1) to the player axis, and then add this.
      I think I dont do the convert right.. 
      I will be glad for help!

      Here is part of my PlayerAxis class:
       
      //player coordinate float x[] = new float[3]; float y[] = new float[3]; float z[] = new float[3]; public PlayerAxis(float move_step, float angle_move) { x[0] = 1; y[1] = 1; z[2] = -1; step = move_step; angle = angle_move; setTransMatrix(); } public void cameraMoving(float angle_step, String axis) { float[] new_x = x; float[] new_y = y; float[] new_z = z; float alfa = angle_step * angle; switch(axis) { case "x": new_z = addVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); break; case "y": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); new_z = subVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); break; case "z": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); } x = new_x; y = new_y; z = new_z; normalization(); } public void playerMoving(float x_move, float y_move, float z_move) { float[] move = new float[3]; move[0] = x_move; move[1] = y_move; move[2] = z_move; setTransMatrix(); float[] trans_move = transVector(move); position[0] = position[0] + step*trans_move[0]; position[1] = position[1] + step*trans_move[1]; position[2] = position[2] + step*trans_move[2]; } public void setTransMatrix() { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { coordiTrans[0][i] = x[i]; coordiTrans[1][i] = y[i]; coordiTrans[2][i] = z[i]; } } public float[] transVector(float[] v) { return multiplyMatrixInVector(coordiTrans, v); }  
      and in the main class i have this:
       
      public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_ESCAPE) { System.exit(0); //player move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_W) { //front //moveAmount[2] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_S) { //back //moveAmount[2] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, -1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_A) { //left //moveAmount[0] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(-1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_D) { //right //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_E) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 1, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_Q) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, -1, 0); //camera move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_I) { //up player.cameraMoving(1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_K) { //down player.cameraMoving(-1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_L) { //right player.cameraMoving(-1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_J) { //left player.cameraMoving(1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_O) { //right round player.cameraMoving(-1, "z"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_U) { //left round player.cameraMoving(1, "z"); } }  
      finallt found it.... i confused with the transformation matrix row and col. thanks anyway!
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm currently trying to implement an SSAO shader from THIS tutorial and i'm running into a few issues here.
      Now, this SSAO method requires view space positions and normals. I'm storing the normals in my deferred renderer in world-space so i had to do a conversion and reconstruct the position from the depth buffer.
      And something there goes horribly wrong (which has probably to do with worldspace to viewspace transformations).
      (here is the full shader source code if someone wants to take a look at it)
      Now, i suspect that the normals are the culprit.
      vec3 normal = ((uNormalViewMatrix*vec4(normalize(texture2D(sNormals, vTexcoord).rgb),1.0)).xyz); "sNormals" is a 2D texture which stores the normals in world space in a RGB FP16 buffer.
      Now i can't use the camera viewspace matrix to transform the normals into viewspace as the cameras position isn't set at (0,0,0), thus skewing the result.
      So what i did is to create a new viewmatrix specifically for this normal without the position at vec3(0,0,0);
      //"camera" is the camera which was used for rendering the normal buffer renderer.setUniform4m(ressources->shaderSSAO->getUniform("uNormalViewMatrix"), glmExt::createViewMatrix(glm::vec3(0,0,0),camera.getForward(),camera.getUp())//parameters are (position,forwardVector,upVector) ); Though i have the feeling this is the wrong approach. Is this right or is there a better/correct way of transforming a world space normal into viewspace?
    • By HawkDeath
      Hi,
      I'm trying mix two textures using own shader system, but I have a problem (I think) with uniforms.
      Code: https://github.com/HawkDeath/shader/tree/test
      To debug I use RenderDocs, but I did not receive good results. In the first attachment is my result, in the second attachment is what should be.
      PS. I base on this tutorial https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Textures.


    • By norman784
      I'm having issues loading textures, as I'm clueless on how to handle / load images maybe I missing something, but the past few days I just google a lot to try to find a solution. Well theres two issues I think, one I'm using Kotlin Native (EAP) and OpenGL wrapper / STB image, so I'm not quite sure wheres the issue, if someone with more experience could give me some hints on how to solve this issue?
      The code is here, if I'm not mistaken the workflow is pretty straight forward, stbi_load returns the pixels of the image (as char array or byte array) and you need to pass those pixels directly to glTexImage2D, so a I'm missing something here it seems.
      Regards
    • By Hashbrown
      I've noticed in most post processing tutorials several shaders are used one after another: one for bloom, another for contrast, and so on. For example: 
      postprocessing.quad.bind() // Effect 1 effect1.shader.bind(); postprocessing.texture.bind(); postprocessing.quad.draw(); postprocessing.texture.unbind(); effect1.shader.unbind(); // Effect 2 effect2.shader.bind(); // ...and so on postprocessing.quad.unbind() Is this good practice, how many shaders can I bind and unbind before I hit performance issues? I'm afraid I don't know what the good practices are in open/webGL regarding binding and unbinding resources. 
      I'm guessing binding many shaders at post processing is okay since the scene has already been updated and I'm just working on a quad and texture at that moment. Or is it more optimal to put shader code in chunks and bind less frequently? I'd love to use several shaders at post though. 
      Another example of what I'm doing at the moment:
      1) Loop through GameObjects, bind its phong shader (send color, shadow, spec, normal samplers), unbind all.
      2) At post: bind post processor quad, and loop/bind through different shader effects, and so on ...
      Thanks all! 
    • By phil67rpg
      void collision(int v) { collision_bug_one(0.0f, 10.0f); glutPostRedisplay(); glutTimerFunc(1000, collision, 0); } void coll_sprite() { if (board[0][0] == 1) { collision(0); flag[0][0] = 1; } } void erase_sprite() { if (flag[0][0] == 1) { glColor3f(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); glBegin(GL_POLYGON); glVertex3f(0.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(0.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glEnd(); } } I am using glutTimerFunc to wait a small amount of time to display a collision sprite before I black out the sprite. unfortunately my code only blacks out the said sprite without drawing the collision sprite, I have done a great deal of research on the glutTimerFunc and  animation.
    • By Lewa
      So, i stumbled upon the topic of gamma correction.
      https://learnopengl.com/Advanced-Lighting/Gamma-Correction
      So from what i've been able to gather: (Please correct me if i'm wrong)
      Old CRT monitors couldn't display color linearly, that's why gamma correction was nessecary. Modern LCD/LED monitors don't have this issue anymore but apply gamma correction anyway. (For compatibility reasons? Can this be disabled?) All games have to apply gamma correction? (unsure about that) All textures stored in file formats (.png for example) are essentially stored in SRGB color space (as what we see on the monitor is skewed due to gamma correction. So the pixel information is the same, the percieved colors are just wrong.) This makes textures loaded into the GL_RGB format non linear, thus all lighting calculations are wrong You have to always use the GL_SRGB format to gamma correct/linearise textures which are in SRGB format  
      Now, i'm kinda confused how to proceed with applying gamma correction in OpenGL.
      First of, how can i check if my Monitor is applying gamma correction? I noticed in my monitor settings that my color format is set to "RGB" (can't modify it though.) I'm connected to my PC via a HDMI cable. I'm also using the full RGB range (0-255, not the 16 to ~240 range)
       
      What i tried to do is to apply a gamma correction shader shown in the tutorial above which looks essentially like this: (it's a postprocess shader which is applied at the end of the renderpipeline)
      vec3 gammaCorrection(vec3 color){ // gamma correction color = pow(color, vec3(1.0/2.2)); return color; } void main() { vec3 color; vec3 tex = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = gammaCorrection(tex); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } The results look like this:
      No gamma correction:
      With gamma correction:
       
      The colors in the gamma corrected image look really wased out. (To the point that it's damn ugly. As if someone overlayed a white half transparent texture. I want the colors to pop.)
      Do i have to change the textures from GL_RGB to GL_SRGB in order to gamma correct them in addition to applying the post process gamma correction shader? Do i have to do the same thing with all FBOs? Or is this washed out look the intended behaviour?
    • By OneKaidou
      Hi
       
      I am trying to program shadow volumes and i stumbled upon an artifact which i can not find the cause for.
      I generate the shadow volumes using a geometry shader with reversed extrusion (projecting the lightfacing triangles to infinity) and write the stencil buffer according to z-fail. The base of my code is the "lighting" chapter from learnopengl.com, where i extended the shader class to include geometry shader. I also modified the "lightingshader" to draw the ambient pass when "pass" is set to true and the diffuse/ specular pass when set to false. For easier testing i added a view controls to switch on/off the shadow volumes' color rendering or to change the cubes' position, i made the lightnumber controllable and changed the diffuse pass to render green for easier visualization of my problem.
       
      The first picture shows the rendered scene for one point light, all cubes and the front cube's shadow volume is the only one created (intentional). Here, all is rendered as it should be with all lit areas green and all areas inside the shadow volume black (with the volume's sides blended over).

      If i now turn on the shadow volumes for all the other cubes, we get a bit of a mess, but its also obvious that some areas that were in shadow before are now erroneously lit (for example the first cube to the right from the originaly shadow volumed cube). From my testing the areas erroneously lit are the ones where more than one shadow volume marks the area as shadowed.

      To check if a wrong stencil buffer value caused this problem i decided to change the stencil function for the diffuse pass to only render if the stencil is equal to 2. As i repeated this approach with different values for the stencil function i found out that if i set the value equal to 1 or any other uneven value the lit and shadowed areas are inverted and if i set it to 0 or any other even value i get the results shown above.
      This lead me to believe that the value and thus the stencil buffer values may be clamped to [0,1] which would also explain the artifact, because twice in shadow would equal in no shadow at all, but from what i found on the internet and from what i tested with
      GLint stencilSize = 0; glGetFramebufferAttachmentParameteriv(GL_DRAW_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_STENCIL, GL_FRAMEBUFFER_ATTACHMENT_STENCIL_SIZE, &stencilSize); my stencilsize is 8 bit, which should be values within [0,255].
      Does anyone know what might be the cause for this artifact or the confusing results with other stencil functions?
       
      // [the following code includes all used gl* functions, other parts are due to readability partialy excluded] // glfw: initialize and configure // ------------------------------ glfwInit(); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MAJOR, 4); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MINOR, 4); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_PROFILE, GLFW_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE); // glfw window creation // -------------------- GLFWwindow* window = glfwCreateWindow(SCR_WIDTH, SCR_HEIGHT, "LearnOpenGL", NULL, NULL); if (window == NULL) { cout << "Failed to create GLFW window" << endl; glfwTerminate(); return -1; } glfwMakeContextCurrent(window); glfwSetFramebufferSizeCallback(window, framebuffer_size_callback); glfwSetCursorPosCallback(window, mouse_callback); glfwSetScrollCallback(window, scroll_callback); // tell GLFW to capture our mouse glfwSetInputMode(window, GLFW_CURSOR, GLFW_CURSOR_DISABLED); // glad: load all OpenGL function pointers // --------------------------------------- if (!gladLoadGLLoader((GLADloadproc)glfwGetProcAddress)) { cout << "Failed to initialize GLAD" << endl; return -1; } // ==================================================================================================== // window and functions are set up // ==================================================================================================== // configure global opengl state // ----------------------------- glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST); glEnable(GL_CULL_FACE); // build and compile our shader program [...] // set up vertex data (and buffer(s)) and configure vertex attributes [...] // shader configuration [...] // render loop // =========== while (!glfwWindowShouldClose(window)) { // input processing and fps calculation[...] // render // ------ glClearColor(0.1f, 0.1f, 0.1f, 1.0f); glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); glDepthMask(GL_TRUE); //enable depth writing glDepthFunc(GL_LEQUAL); //avoid z-fighting //draw ambient component into color and depth buffer view = camera.GetViewMatrix(); projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(camera.Zoom), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); // setting up lighting shader for ambient pass [...] // render the cubes glBindVertexArray(cubeVAO); for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { //position cube [...] glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 36); } //------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ glDepthMask(GL_FALSE); //disable depth writing glEnable(GL_BLEND); glBlendFunc(GL_ONE, GL_ONE); //additive blending glEnable(GL_STENCIL_TEST); //setting up shadowShader and lightingShader [...] for (int light = 0; light < lightsused; light++) { glDepthFunc(GL_LESS); glClear(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT); //configure stencil ops for front- and backface to write according to z-fail glStencilOpSeparate(GL_FRONT, GL_KEEP, GL_DECR_WRAP, GL_KEEP); //-1 for front-facing glStencilOpSeparate(GL_BACK, GL_KEEP, GL_INCR_WRAP, GL_KEEP); //+1 for back-facing glStencilFunc(GL_ALWAYS, 0, GL_TRUE); //stencil test always passes if(hidevolumes) glColorMask(GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE, GL_FALSE); //disable writing to the color buffer glDisable(GL_CULL_FACE); glEnable(GL_DEPTH_CLAMP); //necessary to render SVs into infinity //draw SV------------------- shadowShader.use(); shadowShader.setInt("lightnr", light); int nr; if (onecaster) nr = 1; else nr = 10; for (int i = 0; i < nr; i++) { //position cube[...] glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 36); } //-------------------------- glDisable(GL_DEPTH_CLAMP); glEnable(GL_CULL_FACE); glStencilFunc(GL_EQUAL, 0, GL_TRUE); //stencil test passes for ==0 so only for non shadowed areas glStencilOp(GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP, GL_KEEP); //keep stencil values for illumination glColorMask(GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE, GL_TRUE); //enable writing to the color buffer glDepthFunc(GL_LEQUAL); //avoid z-fighting //draw diffuse and specular pass lightingShader.use(); lightingShader.setInt("lightnr", light); // render the cubes for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { //position cube[...] glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 36); } } glDisable(GL_BLEND); glDepthMask(GL_TRUE); //enable depth writing glDisable(GL_STENCIL_TEST); //------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ // also draw the lamp object(s) [...] // glfw: swap buffers and poll IO events (keys pressed/released, mouse moved etc.) // ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- glfwSwapBuffers(window); glfwP } // optional: de-allocate all resources once they've outlived their purpose: // ------------------------------------------------------------------------ glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &cubeVAO); glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &lightVAO); glDeleteBuffers(1, &VBO); // glfw: terminate, clearing all previously allocated GLFW resources. // ------------------------------------------------------------------ glfwTerminate(); return 0;  
    • By Green_Baron
      Hi,
      i am self teaching me graphics and oo programming and came upon this:
      My Window class creates an input handler instance, the glfw user pointer is redirected to that object and methods there do the input handling for keyboard and mouse. That works. Now as part of the input handling i have an orbiting camera that is controlled by mouse movement. GLFW_CURSOR_DISABLED is set as proposed in the glfw manual. The manual says that in this case the cursor is automagically reset to the window's center. But if i don't reset it manually with glfwSetCursorPos( center ) mouse values seem to add up until the scene is locked up.
      Here are some code snippets, mostly standard from tutorials:
      // EventHandler m_eventHandler = new EventHandler( this, glm::vec3( 0.0f, 5.0f, 0.0f ), glm::vec3( 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f ) ); glfwSetWindowUserPointer( m_window, m_eventHandler ); m_eventHandler->setCallbacks(); Creation of the input handler during window creation. For now, the camera is part of the input handler, hence the two vectors (position, up-vector).  In future i'll take that functionally out into an own class that inherits from the event handler.
      void EventHandler::setCallbacks() { glfwSetCursorPosCallback( m_window->getWindow(), cursorPosCallback ); glfwSetKeyCallback( m_window->getWindow(), keyCallback ); glfwSetScrollCallback( m_window->getWindow(), scrollCallback ); glfwSetMouseButtonCallback( m_window->getWindow(), mouseButtonCallback ); } Set callbacks in the input handler.
      // static void EventHandler::cursorPosCallback( GLFWwindow *w, double x, double y ) { EventHandler *c = reinterpret_cast<EventHandler *>( glfwGetWindowUserPointer( w ) ); c->onMouseMove( (float)x, (float)y ); } Example for the cursor pos callback redirection to a class method.
      // virtual void EventHandler::onMouseMove( float x, float y ) { if( x != 0 || y != 0 ) { // @todo cursor should be set automatically, according to doc if( m_window->isCursorDisabled() ) glfwSetCursorPos( m_window->getWindow(), m_center.x, m_center.y ); // switch up/down because its more intuitive m_yaw += m_mouseSensitivity * ( m_center.x - x ); m_pitch += m_mouseSensitivity * ( m_center.y - y ); // to avoid locking if( m_pitch > 89.0f ) m_pitch = 89.0f; if( m_pitch < -89.0f ) m_pitch = -89.0f; // Update Front, Right and Up Vectors updateCameraVectors(); } } // onMouseMove() Mouse movement processor method. The interesting part is the manual reset of the mouse position that made the thing work ...
      // straight line distance between the camera and look at point, here (0,0,0) float distance = glm::length( m_target - m_position ); // Calculate the camera position using the distance and angles float camX = distance * -std::sin( glm::radians( m_yaw ) ) * std::cos( glm::radians( m_pitch) ); float camY = distance * -std::sin( glm::radians( m_pitch) ); float camZ = -distance * std::cos( glm::radians( m_yaw ) ) * std::cos( glm::radians( m_pitch) ); // Set the camera position and perspective vectors m_position = glm::vec3( camX, camY, camZ ); m_front = glm::vec3( 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ) - m_position; m_up = m_worldUp; m_right = glm::normalize( glm::cross( m_front, m_worldUp ) ); glm::lookAt( m_position, m_front, m_up ); Orbiting camera vectors calculation in updateCameraVectors().
      Now, for my understanding, as the glfw manual explicitly states that if cursor is disabled then it is reset to the center, but my code only works if it is reset manually, i fear i am doing something wrong. It is not world moving (only if there is a world to render :-)), but somehow i am curious what i am missing.
       
      I am not a professional programmer, just a hobbyist, so it may well be that i got something principally wrong :-)
      And thanks for any hints and so ...
       
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      631360
    • Total Posts
      2999554
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!