OpenGL Fastest way to stream video to Texture

Recommended Posts

I am using OpenGL 4.2 in my project, using glew and SDL.

What is the fastest way to transfer an RGB 24-bit or grey scale 8-bit image (decoded video frame) from system memory to an OpenGL texture? Is using PBOs the best way to accomplish this, even with modern OpenGL? I saw a NVidia sample using PBOs for this, but its quite a few years old.

The video frames are coming in at 30-60 hz, 640x480..

What is the best way to allocate the gl texture? Should I force power of 2 for the texture (and update a sub rect)?

Use GL_BGRA8 for the internal format, and GL_BGRA for the pixel format (as apposed to GL_RGB for both)?

Should I use BGRA even for grey scale video?

Thanx for any suggestions.

Edited by Ender1618

Share on other sites

Create two threads. One thread which is pulling the frames. Main thread which is creating PBO and update the texture with the proper frames. Those PBO can then be assigned to an screen aligned quad to be rendererd. Use two PBO while one is getting renderered you fill the second one with the next frame and ping pong between them.

Share on other sites

At 640x480 you can probably do this in realtime without needing a PBO.  Even if not, I'd advise that you go about it in the following order:

1) Write the basic version that just updates and displays the texture without anything extra.

2) Add double-buffering to it, using two textures; update texture 0/display texture 1, then swap for the next frame.

Only go to the next step here if the step you're currently on proves too slow for your needs.

GPUs have an annoying tendency to prefer texture data in 1, 2 or 4 byte formats, whereas content deliverers have an annoying tendency to prefer texture data in 3 byte formats so there is no fast way to get 24-bit RGB data into a texture.  You should expand (and swap) it to BGRA at some stage in the process, yes, and this should preferably happen during decompression from source.

glTexStorage2D (
GL_TEXTURE_2D,
1,
GL_RGBA8,
640,
480
);


You'll see that I'm using glTexStorage2D here rather than glTexImage2D - at this stage we just want to allocate storage for the texture and we're not yet concerned about what data is actually going into it.

Each time you get new data in, update the texture as follows:

glTexSubImage2D (
GL_TEXTURE_2D,
0,
0,
0,
640,
480,
GL_BGRA,
GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV,
data
);


The key parameters here are the third and second last ones.  You can write a small program to verify this yourself, but the basic summary is that it is absolutely essential that you match these with what the OpenGL driver is going to prefer, otherwise you're going to get nasty slowdowns and this will be irrespective of whether you use a PBO or double-buffer.  I've benchmarked upload performance increases of over 25x (versus GL_RGB/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE) on some hardware from these two parameters alone.  So get these correct first, then use other methods to make it faster, but only if you need them.

If your data is coming in at 24-bit RGB and if you don't have control over this, then you should expand and swap yourself; don't rely on the driver to do it for you (by e.g. using GL_RGB/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE).  Expand and swap to a pre-allocated (or static) buffer and then glTexSubImage it and it will still be faster.

For RGB(A) data, this particular combination of format and type parameters should be the fastest on most systems but may not be the fastest on all.  For traditional desktop GL (which I'm assuming you're targetting based on your mention of 4.2) you should be safe enough, but as always, benchmark and find out for yourself.

For greyscale data you should be good enough just using a greyscale format for your texture; if you don't want to create a second texture then you can also expand it, but greyscale formats are still fine and fast - the only tricky cases are around 24-bit RGB data formats.

Finally, and if the video is also displayed at 640x480, don't underestimate the power of glDrawPixels.  The same trickiness around 24-bit RGB also applies here, but it may well work just fine for you.

Share on other sites

mhaigan, you mention using glTexStorage2D with GL_RGBA8 and glTexSubImage2D with GL_BGRA.  What does it mean that these are different?

What is the difference between glTexStorage2D and glTexImage2D? The docs mention mostly things about mipmap generation, I dont need mipmaps.

I also notice that

glTexSubImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D,0,0,0,width,height,GL_BGR,GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV,data);

will fail, so I would have to do:

glTexSubImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D,0,0,0,width,height,GL_BGR,GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE,data);

for it to work, so is that to say that I must convert my RGB to BGRA so that I could use GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_8_REV? Since there is no GL_UNSIGNED_INT_8_8_8_REV.

Edited by Ender1618

Share on other sites

TexImage vs TexStorage

TexStorage will just allocate storage for the texture, and can allocate storage for multiple miplevels in one go (ensuring that things are set up correctly for submips).  The miplevels part is not relevant for you here, but using TexStorage is the more correct modern OpenGL way of doing this.

Think of it in terms of malloc, memcpy and free - it's a rough (and not entirely accurate) analogy but should work for the purpose of helping you understand.  TexImage needs to check if the texture storage already exists, delete it if so, allocate new storage, then (if the data pointer is non-NULL) copy in the supplied data.  TexStorage just needs to allocate storage.  Since that's all you need for your initial texture creation, TexStorage is sufficient.

TexStorage vs TexSubImage

The difference here is simple enough - the internal format parameter to TexStorage describes how the texture is represented internally by OpenGL.  The format and type parameters to TexSubImage desribe how the data you're feeding it is laid out.  And now unfortunately we need to get into a hangover from legacy OpenGL.  That internal format parameter - it's not prescriptive.  It just means "give me something that I can read data in this format from".  OpenGL itself is allowed to give you more colour channels and more bits-per-channel than you ask for; this point is going to become important shortly, so remember it.

RGB vs BGR vs RGBA vs BGRA

First off, I need to re-emphasise this: don't use GL_BGR/GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE - that's going to punt you right onto the slow path and you'll end up implementing double-buffering, PBOs, and still wondering why you're not getting good performance from it.  The fact that you've mentioned it shows that you're still thinking along the lines of "saving memory" and avoiding what looks like extra CPU-side work in your own code.  This is important - CPU-side work in your own code is not the only CPU-side work you have to deal with; you've also got CPU-side work in the driver, latency, synchronization, format conversion, etc (all in the driver) to worry about and you have no control over those if you get things wrong.  Burn the extra memory, do the extra work in your own code, it's a tradeoff that will allow you to get in and out of that TexSubImage call as fast as possible and that's where the real key to performance is here.

Remember that bit I said was important?  Here's why.  There's no such thing as a 24-bit texture format on the vast majority of hardware.  Ask for a 24-bit format and you'll instead get a 32-bit one, with the extra 8 bits either ignored or set to 255 (as appropriate).  So you gain nothing by trying to transfer 24-bit data, but you lose a lot because that 24-bit data isn't going to match what's actually being stored internally, and the driver will need to convert it.  It's another unfortunate hangover from legacy OpenGL that these options still exist, because they can lead to much confusion and wrong thinking.  See here for further discussion of this: http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Common_Mistakes#Texture_upload_and_pixel_reads

So match those parameters and the driver will look at them and say "yes!  I can just suck this data straight in without needing to do anything else, hey!, I can even read it in 32-bit chunks too, thanks very much, I'm done, here's control handed back to your program as quickly as possible".  Get them wrong and the driver will say "oops, you've given something I don't like, now I need to go allocating extra buffers, rummaging around in the data, converting it to something I do like, and by the way - do I need to read the original texture back into system memory first?"  You don't have control over what the driver does when you feed it something it doesn't like, and some drivers can do absolutely awful things.  What you do have control over is feeding it something it does like, and because any conversion you need to do is in your own code, you can optimize it to your heart's content.

So yes, convert your RGB source to BGRA; it's a nice fast simple loop that you do have control over (that you can even unwind some).  That's what most GPUs/drivers are going to prefer, so give them that and you'll get the fast transfer.  8_8_8_8_REV is optional but will put you on the absolute fastest path with even crappy low-quality Intels

Share on other sites

So the glTexStorage2D internal format is just a high level representation of what is going to be in the texture and the depth per channel ? The actual order of R G B A bytes is up to OGL driver.

Create an account

Register a new account

• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
628293
• Total Posts
2981869
• Similar Content

• By mellinoe
Hi all,
First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
• By aejt
I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
I have these classes:
For GPU resources:
Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).
And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
Factory classes for resources:
For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
Factory classes for assets:
Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).

Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
Thanks!
• By nedondev
I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
Thanks.

• So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!

• Hi,
I'm trying to learn OpenGL through a website and have proceeded until this page of it. The output is a simple triangle. The problem is the complexity.
I have read that page several times and tried to analyse the code but I haven't understood the code properly and completely yet. This is the code: