• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Making an optimized 3d mmo in open gl c++

This topic is 1750 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I currently starting to make a mmorpg in c++ using opengl. How could I optimized it to run the best it can on integrated graphics but also take full advantage of top of line graphics card like a GTX 660 or higher.Would it been done directly in the way I code opengl or would it been done by changing the quality of the texture images?? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Drop OpenGL and port it to D3D9.

 

Seriously.

 

OpenGL on integrated graphics is getting better for sure, but it's still not in the same league as D3D for robustness of driver quality and all-round general predictable behaviour.  D3D will give you (and - importantly - your players) a much more stable, solid experience and with less driver weirdness to have to deal with on integrateds, you'll be able to access features that are just not available with their OpenGL drivers (such as high-level shaders), and you'll be able to target machines with OEM drivers that don't include OpenGL support.  D3D9 in particular will enable you to hit even older Intel GMA class graphics with a reasonably full feature set.

 

On the other hand, and being a little more serious, I'd suggest that you're spreading your target hardware too wide.  You're talking several generations of hardware and at least an order of magnitude difference in performance, and you want to get the best possible out of it all.  Even with the best will in the world that's just not going to happen; nobody does that, not even major game studios with huge budgets.  So scale down your ambitions and pick a more realistic and achievable goal instead.

Edited by mhagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, DirectX is Windows only. That said, it sounds like you may be a beginner of sorts. Perhaps you should aim for a smaller scale project to get an understanding of the graphics API before you target something as large as an MMORPG?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't consider myself a beginner, I have over 3 years of c++, c# and game programming behind me but I have not programmed a game with optimized graphics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, but I still think you're taking on too much here.  Let's recap.

 

You want this to be portable, and presumably as well as Windows and Mac you're also looking at Linux.

You want it to take full advantage of modern/high-end graphics cards.

You also want it to run as well as possible on low ends and integrateds (which are also going to include those integrateds with OEM drivers I mentioned).

 

You're just not going to be able to do this, full stop.  It's neither a realistic nor an achievable goal.  Yes, it's nice to be all inclusive, but one person dosn't have time or resources to do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen good OpenGL performance and compatibility in the newest Intel integrated GPUs, like HD Graphics 3000 and co. These will eg. be able to do deferred rendering without problems and with reasonable performance. Anything older than that (for example GMA 3000/4000, not HD) will be problematic and works much better with D3D. Note I'm only talking of Windows drivers here, have not tested Intel cards on Linux or Mac.

 

To scale performance consists of many things, in addition to texture resolution you can eg.

- reduce complexity of shading equations

- leave out "decoration" objects on low-end systems, as well as particle effects

- have object LODs with fewer triangles

- disable dynamic shadows, or render them with lower resolution

- disable or scale down post processing effects

 

Basically, everything you usually see in games' graphics settings menus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This question is like putting the cart before the horse. If you dont have a game you dont need to worry about optimizing it.

I would worry much more about how to actually undertake such a huge project as an MMORPG that needs a large amount of content. Maybe you would be better off doing something less demanding?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't consider myself a beginner, I have over 3 years of c++, c# and game programming behind me but I have not programmed a game with optimized graphics.

Oh, I see! You are a big boy now! smile.png

MMORPGs require large budgets (tens of millions of dollars is probably the right order of magnitude) and involve hiring lots of people. The details of how to optimize the graphics are something you can ask one the experienced graphics programmers you will need to hire.

I know some people don't like analogies, but this is a bit like wanting to make a movie like Avatar and asking about some technical aspect, like motion capture. While motion capture was important for this movie, what you should be thinking about if you want to make a movie like Avatar is that you need a movie studio and a lot of money. Or you could make some low-budget indie film instead (clicky), or you could get a job in someone else's project so that you can learn how the business works. Edited by Álvaro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you need tens of millions of dollars in assets and hire a ton of people to make a MMORPG? No..

 

Every time somebody says they want to make an MMORPG, it always gets assumed that they are trying to create something bigger and better than World of Warcraft, or whatever happens to be the most popular MMO at the time.

 

Even if that was the goal, how do you solicit funding without some sort of proof of concept or technology demo?

 

It's entirely possible for one person to create a framework that would allow for the basic operation of a MMO type game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It looks like Megahertz and I have different ideas of what a MMORPG is. "MM" stands for "massively multiplayer", which already implies a level of infrastructure that a single person cannot accomplish.

What's an example of a MMORPG built by a single person?

EDIT: From the Wikipedia page on MMORPGs:

The cost of developing a competitive commercial MMORPG title often exceeded $10 million by 2003. These projects require multiple disciplines within game design and development such as 3D modeling, 2D art, animation, user interfaces, client/server engineering, database architecture, and network infrastructure.

Edited by Álvaro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

shawk08033, on 04 Apr 2013 - 19:09, said:
I currently starting to make a mmorpg in c++ using opengl. How could I optimized it to run the best it can on integrated graphics but also take full advantage of top of line graphics card like a GTX 660 or higher.Would it been done directly in the way I code opengl or would it been done by changing the quality of the texture images??

To answer your question, most games provide different models with different levels of details. and provide simplier shaders for hardware that can't do all the fancy stuff that modern hardware can do.

It's all about providing different rendering paths depending on some pre-set variables that the user can change(most commonly these settings are things like high quality models, high quality shaders(that do more lightning calculations, or post-processing effects), quality of textures, etc.) basically you provide several different rendering modes, and the user can select the one that is most playable for them.


However, i'd heed the warnings of the above commentors, MMO's are a pain in the ass to make by yourself. perhaps don't consider building an MMO, but instead a small multiplayer game is more manageable, and doesn't need heavy duty dedicated public servers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you need tens of millions of dollars in assets and hire a ton of people to make a MMORPG? No..

 

Every time somebody says they want to make an MMORPG, it always gets assumed that they are trying to create something bigger and better than World of Warcraft, or whatever happens to be the most popular MMO at the time.

 

Even if that was the goal, how do you solicit funding without some sort of proof of concept or technology demo?

 

It's entirely possible for one person to create a framework that would allow for the basic operation of a MMO type game.

 

Well based on the OP:

 

run the best it can on integrated graphics but also take full advantage of top of line graphics card

 

Even if we leave out the gameplay elements, building highly scalable netcode, hiring out server farms to host it, having extremely high bandwidth, etc - even if we ignore all those factors, this element on it's own is far too ambitious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like Megahertz and I have different ideas of what a MMORPG is. "MM" stands for "massively multiplayer", which already implies a level of infrastructure that a single person cannot accomplish.

What's an example of a MMORPG built by a single person?

EDIT: From the Wikipedia page on MMORPGs:

The cost of developing a competitive commercial MMORPG title often exceeded $10 million by 2003. These projects require multiple disciplines within game design and development such as 3D modeling, 2D art, animation, user interfaces, client/server engineering, database architecture, and network infrastructure.


Allthough there are MMOs developed by single developers or 2-3 man teams.

The only requirement to really qualify as an MMO is that the game supports a massive number of players playing together at the same time in a single game world, if you get rid of things such as realtime gameplay, content variation, etc it becomes quite doable even for a single person and hosting costs doesn't necessarily have to be that high. (a MMO where updates are sent/revieved once or twice per minute is still an MMO, and such infrequent updates pretty much eliminates the need for a complex server/network architecture. (If you have more players than a single server can handle at those rates you can just launch more game instances, rather than try to fit more players per instance)

Ofcourse, "Optimized 3D MMO" sort of suggest that the OP is trying to take on games like WoW head on. Edited by SimonForsman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been told about how hard mmo are but right I am just trying to make a demo because I have a friend who owns a marketing firm whos interested in the game. Right now i am just creating simple code structure so I can show off the concept.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

shawk08033 - one thing that could be done to keep performance high across many generations of hardware is to have different art assets with less polygons, smaller textures and less intensive pixel shading requirements. If you also had a "high-res" version of these assets, players with more modern graphics hardware could use that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You definitely need to start with a really good mmorpg maker, either that, or make one instead, without the best tools youll never finish it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
  • Advertisement