• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

What is real license of FTGL?

This topic is 1747 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi..

 

I need totally free or MIT license Font lib.

 

I'm Korean so I can use multibyte character.

 

Everybody using FTGL..

 

but at source forge it marked as GPL!!

 

and at their document  It looks like MIT.

 

What is real license of FTGL.

 

and Can you recommend me totally free font renderer?

 

Damn..

 

after 1-2 years later I must make one and mark it as totally free. 

 

why we must be suffered so much about font or that kind of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

"FTGL is free software. You may use it, modify it and redistribute it under the terms of the MIT license or the GNU LGPL, at your option."

- FTGL Website

 

FTGL uses FreeType which is released under a BSD-style license: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT

 

 

Edited by claesson92

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"FTGL is free software. You may use it, modify it and redistribute it under the terms of the MIT license or the GNU LGPL, at your option."

- FTGL Website

 

FTGL uses FreeType which is released under a BSD-style license: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT

 

 

what is "the GNU LGPL, at your option.""??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


"FTGL is free software. You may use it, modify it and redistribute it under the terms of the MIT license or the GNU LGPL, at your option."
- FTGL Website
 
FTGL uses FreeType which is released under a BSD-style license: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/docs/FTL.TXT

 
 
what is "the GNU LGPL, at your option.""??


it means you can pick whichever of the two licenses (MIT or LGPL) you prefer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Note: GPL and LGPL are two different licenses.

LGPL is perfectly usable for closed-source commercial games as long as you don't modify the library, and as long as you link to it dynamically.
GPL I tend to avoid for commercial software, as it has more limitations that make it less palatable to me for business purposes. Edited by Servant of the Lord

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it says you can choose to use either license. Take whichever one you like more.

 

As for LGPL: it's like GPL but if you link to it dynamically (i.e. link as DLL) it won't affect your source code. If you statically link then it does, just like the GPL. Honestly, since you have the option for the MIT license, go with that and make your life easier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it says you can choose to use either license. Take whichever one you like more.

 

As for LGPL: it's like GPL but if you link to it dynamically (i.e. link as DLL) it won't affect your source code. If you statically link then it does, just like the GPL. Honestly, since you have the option for the MIT license, go with that and make your life easier.

 

 

Still confusing .. Is it makeing sense? select very unbenefit license. ??

 

Who want to choose about using GPL?

 

If he choose MIT. he can distribute his software as GPL.

 

I don't understand

 

Cause I'm Korean? :)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to put this in simple English:


You may choose either the LGPL or the MIT license. You can choose either one. Some people like the LGPL and some people like the MIT. Which one you prefer depends on what your goals are. Just pick the one that is best for you.

 

Korean (translated by Google):

 

??? LGPL ?? MIT ???? ? ??? ??? ? ????. ?? ??? ??? ? ????.LGPL? MIT ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ????. ?? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????. ???? ?? ??? ?????.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The option to use LGPL is probably there mostly for political reasons.

 

Some people have a strong preference for anything GPL. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thanks good peoples

 

I must use MIT..

 

and for not confusing others I think about make my own lib under MIT.Hmm.. ( not now :) when I'm so free )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement