• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Vortez

The fibonacci numbers... and god?

28 posts in this topic

Any undergrad psych major can make arguments better than Aquinas did.

Isn't it crazy that he's one of the most influential writers in history?

Maybe to Christians in the west, mostly Catholics. Billions in China and India are thinking: "Who the fuck is Thomas Aquinas?" Besides, influential is a function of time more than correctness. Jesus is more important that Mill not because of inherent value but because he is like more than 1000 years older.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya might want to crack open a copy of Plato some time.  You know, the guy whence came the concept of platonic solids.  He knew a bit about mathematics and the perceived divine perfection of creation.

 

Plato actually didn't have much of anything to do with the concept of platonic solids, being neither the first person to conjecture that they were the only regular convex polyhedra nor the first person to prove this.

 

Also, a lot of Plato's most significant beliefs relating to the "divine" are either empirically false or "not even wrong." He certainly got a lot of things right, but he's probably not a good source if you're looking for either true facts or arguments without strange leaps and assumptions.

Aquinas would also be a good read if you want questions about absolute and logical proof of the divine.

 

Questions, perhaps, but certainly not answers. Aquinas had a fairly poor understanding of proof, even compared to his ancient predecessors, to say nothing of the 19th century founders of formal logic.

 

 

(...) psych major can make arguments better than Aquinas did.

 

This may, strictly speaking, be true. It is nonetheless probably not what you wanted to say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya might want to crack open a copy of Plato some time.  You know, the guy whence came the concept of platonic solids.  He knew a bit about mathematics and the perceived divine perfection of creation.

 

Plato actually didn't have much of anything to do with the concept of platonic solids, being neither the first person to conjecture that they were the only regular convex polyhedra nor the first person to prove this.

 

Also, a lot of Plato's most significant beliefs relating to the "divine" are either empirically false or "not even wrong." He certainly got a lot of things right, but he's probably not a good source if you're looking for either true facts or arguments without strange leaps and assumptions.
 

>Aquinas would also be a good read if you want questions about absolute and logical proof of the divine.

 

Questions, perhaps, but certainly not answers. Aquinas had a fairly poor understanding of proof, even compared to his ancient predecessors, to say nothing of the 19th century founders of formal logic.

 

 

(...) psych major can make arguments better than Aquinas did.

 

This may, strictly speaking, be true. It is nonetheless probably not what you wanted to say.

 

Woops. Well it was obvious what I meant anywho.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Any undergrad psych major can make arguments better than Aquinas did.

Isn't it crazy that he's one of the most influential writers in history?


"Influential" does not equate to "right."


 
"It" tends to equate to "existentially relevant", though.
 
 

Billions in China and India are thinking: "Who the fuck is Thomas Aquinas?"

 
That's only because they're so uneducated in China and India...

OR

ARE

THEY...?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0