Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL 1.1 to OpenGL 3 wrapper

This topic is 1735 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi. I came across TWL (Themable Widget Library, when looking for a GUI library for Java + OpenGL (LWJGL).


It looks pretty nice and there is an editor and all. The drawback is that is coded against OpenGL 1.1 spec and I'm using OpenGL 3.3 core.


So I looked at the sources to see if I could code a wrapper to get TWL working with my core context. Thing is, OGL 3 is all the OGL I know, so I don't know exactly how OpenGL 1 calls would be "translated".


I know only renderer>lwjgl has GL1.1 calls, which is a 2.5k line long package, so its not that bad (rest of the project is 35k line long or so).


So far I've seen a few matrix stack calls, attrib stack calls, calls for things I have no experience so far (textures, fixed function anti aliasing) and a few things that I don't quite know how to replace (GL_QUADS and GL_LINE_LOOP are deprecated in 3.3 i think).


As you probably notice, I'm not quite experienced yet. While I have gotten to the point of implementing soft per fragment shading with shader programs (with normals math and all that) there are quite a few spots I've jumped over without touching them (texturing being one of them). Besides the point that even if I manage to translate the GL11 calls, I don't how I would integrate the GUI library into my project (passing around my context to the GUI renderer I think?).


Do you think I'm biting more than I can handle? I know I could just create a compat context and see how it works but making the wrapper to 3.3 core sounds like a good learning experience. And while I don't have the time to do this right now (finals, exams, courses and all that good stuff) I'll probably want to do it in the near future. 

Edited by TheChubu

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't you just create your context with [tt]CONTEXT_COMPATIBILITY_PROFILE_BIT[/tt]? This will ask for a compatibility context, which supports all deprecated functionality (including OpenGL 1.1), so you should be able to plug in this library without any modifications.


Although support for the compatibility profile is optional, I don't know a single implementor that doesn't support it (that's unlikely to happen any time soon, too). In fact, I remember a guy from nVidia holding a lecture once (some title like "What's new in OpenGL 3") which basically advised to always use it because your programs don't get any slower and most/all of the deprecated functionality is well-supported in hardware anyway, so there was no reason not to use it. I'm somewhat disinclined to agree with that statement, but if that's an official statement from an IHV, then that's what it is. They gotta know better than you and me.


Found it, that "nVidia guy" was Mark Kilgard, see page 97:

Lots of easy-to-use, effective API got labeled deprecated [...] Best advice for real developers: Simply use the “compatibility” profile.

No, your program won’t go faster for using the “core” profile. It may go slower because of extra “is this allowed to work?” checks.

Edited by samoth

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't you just create your context with [tt]CONTEXT_COMPATIBILITY_PROFILE_BIT[/tt]?



This is a quote, the editor just bricks it when I press backspace for some reason:


"Do you think I'm biting more than I can handle? I know I could just create a compat context and see how it works but making the wrapper to 3.3 core sounds like a good learning experience."


Basically that. I know that a compatibility context doesn't affects your performance (I believe Valve stated that in their GDC presentation on OpenGL recently) . I was asking if I you thought I could make it with my current experience (probably not glMaterial for example) and if you could make any recommendation.


I thought of checking all the GL11 calls TWL does, categorize them and see what kind of structures I'd need to support them (matrix stack for glMatrix, some boolean state flags, buffers to hold glVertex call data, and so on) and slap everything in a single class with static methods, replacing the "GL11.glVertex" call with "wrapper.glVertex" or something like that (I thought of AGL.glVertex but AGL is already Apple's naming scheme for OpenGL calls heh).

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1735 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
    • By pr033r
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article ( inspirate from another code (here: but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch):
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ...
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
  • Popular Now