• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RoundPotato

Direct3D11 used for 2D games?

5 posts in this topic

Hey,

 

I hear people saying Direct2D is to be thrown in the trashcan and Direct3D is used to make 2D games.

 

Is it because you can make the third dimension constant ? If so that's a 33% overhead, would it be possible to throw it out ? And all of this using Direct3D ?

 

Cheers.

Edited by RoundPotato
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not an additional overhead.  The calculation is exactly the same in both cases - a mul (position, matrix) (or mul (matrix, position) depending on your major-ness preferences) calculation.  Position can be stored as two components (x and y) in your vertex buffer, and when it's moved into a shader register the extra "0, 1" will be automatically added to it.

 

Good to know, thanks (although in extreme cases I believe that automatic addition is the overhead).

 

Drawing 2D stuff on-screen using the same pipeline as for 3D stuff is something that's been done successfully and without any additional problems or overheads since at least Quake in 1996.  Why do you think it would be a problem today?

 

Simple, because I don't know a thing about it.

 

Some kind of reference for this alleged junking of Direct2D would be nice as well......

 

Well, it's just floating around including some suggestions at these forums, so I imagine the overall picture.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct2D is literally built on top of Direct3D.  There's no way around it other than either running it over the CPU (always a bad idea) or invoking some special code paths in the driver (that don't exist).  Also, I don't think Direct2D is going away any time soon:

 

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd370987(v=vs.85).aspx

 

Direct2D is a user-mode library that is built using the Direct3D 10.1 API. This means that Direct2D applications benefit from hardware-accelerated rendering on modern mainstream GPUs. Hardware acceleration is also achieved on earlier Direct3D 9 hardware by using Direct3D 10-level-9 rendering. This combination provides excellent performance on graphics hardware on existing Windows PCs.

Note  Starting with Windows 8, Direct2D is built using the Direct3D 11.1 API.

 

The reason to use Direct2D over Direct3D is a matter of convenience.  If anything, D3D would be faster because you have more control over the API calls (though this is unlikely to be actually meaningful).

Edited by SeraphLance
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct2D is literally built on top of Direct3D.  There's no way around it other than either running it over the CPU (always a bad idea) or invoking some special code paths in the driver (that don't exist).  Also, I don't think Direct2D is going away any time soon:

 

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd370987(v=vs.85).aspx

 

 

Direct2D is a user-mode library that is built using the Direct3D 10.1 API. This means that Direct2D applications benefit from hardware-accelerated rendering on modern mainstream GPUs. Hardware acceleration is also achieved on earlier Direct3D 9 hardware by using Direct3D 10-level-9 rendering. This combination provides excellent performance on graphics hardware on existing Windows PCs.

Note  Starting with Windows 8, Direct2D is built using the Direct3D 11.1 API.

 

The reason to use Direct2D over Direct3D is a matter of convenience.  If anything, D3D would be faster because you have more control over the API calls (though this is unlikely to be actually meaningful).

 

Well I changed my overall picture, I now see it as a "convenience layer" over Direct3D. Also you reassured usage of Direct3D for 2D.

Thank you, you narrowed direction in which I am planning on building beautiful bridges.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a matter of fact MS just updated Direct2D to version 1.1 and it is a major component of use in HTML 5 and other web graphics especially for some of the things being done for Win8
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0