Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Migi0027

DX11 DX11 - Vertex To Pixel Shaders - Return Types

This topic is 2028 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello once again!

 

I have a question that hasn't really been bothering me, but it interests me!

 

So consider the following simple shader:

cbuffer ConstantObjectBuffer : register(c1)
{
    matrix worldMatrix;
    matrix viewMatrix;
    matrix projectionMatrix;

    matrix rotationMatrix;
}

cbuffer ConstantFrameBuffer : register(c0)
{
    float4 lDir;
    float4 lColor;
}

struct VOut
{
    float4 position : SV_POSITION;
    float4 color : COLOR;
};

VOut VShader(float4 position : POSITION, float4 normal : NORMAL)
{
    VOut output;
    output.position = mul(position, worldMatrix);
    output.position = mul(output.position, viewMatrix);
    output.position = mul(output.position, projectionMatrix);
	
    float4 n = normalize(mul(rotationMatrix, normal));
    float diffusebrightness = saturate(dot(n, lDir));
    output.color = lColor * diffusebrightness;

    return output;
}

float4 PShader(VOut input) : SV_TARGET
{
    return input.color;
} 

 

Now in the vertex shaders parameters, it has the vertex position and normal, simple right? But these needs to be defined in the input layout, which I fully understand. But the structure that the vertex shader returns to the pixel shader, called VOut, also have these type definitions. Now what I mean with 'type definitions' (NOT A REAL THING happy.png ), is the following:

 

In the vertex function VOut VShader(float4 position : POSITION, float4 normal : NORMAL), you see that we have a 4 component float called position, and after that we define the input layout schematic: "POSITION". Now the "POSITION" is what I call a type definition wink.png .

 

So back to the vertex returning VOut. In the structure VOut I also define different variables, like .color, and give it a schematic : COLOR, now if I did this in the vertex shader it would crash! But not in this return structure.... So what is the point in defining the non-existing schematic in the vertex return structure? ohmy.png

 

PS. I know that you have to define SV_POSITION as a schematic, as it's kinda fundamental! tongue.png

 

THANKS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

Hey Migi0027,

 

The semantic does exist. It exists for the pixel shader.

You could write the pixel shader like this if you wanted:

float4 PShader(float4 color : COLOR) : SV_TARGET
{
    return color;
} 

 

The SV_POSITION semantic exists for the non-programmable rasterization stage.

Edited by Racoonacoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the semantic is automatically created for each variable, which is sen't to the pixel shader?

 

Because I could type in some crazy names and it would still work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

float5(shaderspixel  color: COLOR) :SV TARGET

{       

 

      return COLOR;

}

 

if (COLOR == !=COLOR)

   return 0;

}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!