Sign in to follow this  
Laval B

OpenGL States managed by a VAO

Recommended Posts

Laval B    12387

Hello everyone.

 

My question is about OpenGL and i'm using version 3.2 to 4.1 core profile.

 

I have been reading about VAO and i must admit i'm a bit confused. Looking at the spec it is clear that all vertex attribute states are "stored" in the VAO : glVertexAttribPointer, glEnableVertexAttribArray, etc which is ok.

 

According to the spec,GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER binding is a VAO state but not GL_ARRAY_BUFFER binding. Does that mean binding a VAO will bind the index buffer but not the vertex buffer ? So in order to render the content of a VBO, i would need to bind the VAO and the VBO right ? If this is true i find it odd. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? I often have many index buffers for a single VBO.

 

I know there is plenty of posts on the net about this subject, but they almost all endup more confusing then anything because half of the people say one thing and the rest says the other.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mhagain    13430

You don't need to bind the VBO.  The array buffer binding is part of the per-attrib array state that is captured in a VAO during your glVertexAttribPointer call so the correct VBO will be used when you come to issue your draw call.

 

Binding a VBO on it's own doesn't do much - all it does is specify that "this is the buffer we're going to use for future operations" - when you issue that glVertexAttribPointer call, that's the point at which the currently bound VBO is picked up and attached to the state used by the attrib array.

 

This is made more explicit by the documentation for glVertexAttribPointer where it's stated that "The buffer object binding (GL_ARRAY_BUFFER_BINDING) is saved as generic vertex attribute array state".

 

If you think about it, this makes sense.  Consider the following hypothetical example:

 

glBindVertexArray (vao);

glBindBuffer (GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo1);
glEnableVertexAttribArray (0);
glVertexAttribPointer (0, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 0, NULL);

glBindBuffer (GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo2);
glEnableVertexAttribArray (1);
glVertexAttribPointer (1, 2, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 0, NULL);

 

If the array buffer was not part of the attrib array states, how would the driver know which VBO to use for each attrib array?  It can't.  If the array buffer binding was saved in the VAO, which binding gets saved?  You can't have two simultaneous array buffer bindings (there's only one binding point).

 

Clear as mud?  Well, yes and no.  Just think about it in terms of "the array buffer to use for each attrib array is part of the attrib array state, and the actual binding itself is not needed for this" if it helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Laval B    12387

Thank you for the clear answer smile.png

 

It makes sense indeed, i didn't pay attention when i read the glVertexAttribPointer/glEnableVertexAttribArray part and got confused when they say :

 

<array> is the vertex array object name. The resulting vertex array

object is a new state vector, comprising all the state values listed in
tables 6.6 (except for the CLIENT_ACTIVE_TEXTURE selector state), 6.7,
and 6.8 (except for the ARRAY_BUFFER_BINDING state).

 

Ref http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ARB/vertex_array_object.txt

 

I forgot that vertex attributes are not necessarily in the same vbo (over 95 % of my vbo are filled with interleaved data).

 

Now, index buffer will get bound when binding the VAO. I guess i can still bind the index buffer separately after binding the VAO (which will update the VAO state every time though). If i do this, i will have to make sure to bind index buffer 0 if I render a VAO with no index buffer. Would that be a problem ? You see, my code base pretty much separates the vertex (and the vertext attribute specification) from the index.

Edited by Laval B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
    • By markshaw001
      Hi i am new to this forum  i wanted to ask for help from all of you i want to generate real time terrain using a 32 bit heightmap i am good at c++ and have started learning Opengl as i am very interested in making landscapes in opengl i have looked around the internet for help about this topic but i am not getting the hang of the concepts and what they are doing can some here suggests me some good resources for making terrain engine please for example like tutorials,books etc so that i can understand the whole concept of terrain generation.
       
    • By KarimIO
      Hey guys. I'm trying to get my application to work on my Nvidia GTX 970 desktop. It currently works on my Intel HD 3000 laptop, but on the desktop, every bind textures specifically from framebuffers, I get half a second of lag. This is done 4 times as I have three RGBA textures and one depth 32F buffer. I tried to use debugging software for the first time - RenderDoc only shows SwapBuffers() and no OGL calls, while Nvidia Nsight crashes upon execution, so neither are helpful. Without binding it runs regularly. This does not happen with non-framebuffer binds.
      GLFramebuffer::GLFramebuffer(FramebufferCreateInfo createInfo) { glGenFramebuffers(1, &fbo); glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); textures = new GLuint[createInfo.numColorTargets]; glGenTextures(createInfo.numColorTargets, textures); GLenum *DrawBuffers = new GLenum[createInfo.numColorTargets]; for (uint32_t i = 0; i < createInfo.numColorTargets; i++) { glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[i]); GLint internalFormat; GLenum format; TranslateFormats(createInfo.colorFormats[i], format, internalFormat); // returns GL_RGBA and GL_RGBA glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, internalFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, format, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); DrawBuffers[i] = GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i; glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i, textures[i], 0); } if (createInfo.depthFormat != FORMAT_DEPTH_NONE) { GLenum depthFormat; switch (createInfo.depthFormat) { case FORMAT_DEPTH_16: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8; break; } glGenTextures(1, &depthrenderbuffer); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, depthFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, depthrenderbuffer, 0); } if (createInfo.numColorTargets > 0) glDrawBuffers(createInfo.numColorTargets, DrawBuffers); else glDrawBuffer(GL_NONE); if (glCheckFramebufferStatus(GL_FRAMEBUFFER) != GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE) std::cout << "Framebuffer Incomplete\n"; glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, 0); width = createInfo.width; height = createInfo.height; } // ... // FBO Creation FramebufferCreateInfo gbufferCI; gbufferCI.colorFormats = gbufferCFs.data(); gbufferCI.depthFormat = FORMAT_DEPTH_32; gbufferCI.numColorTargets = gbufferCFs.size(); gbufferCI.width = engine.settings.resolutionX; gbufferCI.height = engine.settings.resolutionY; gbufferCI.renderPass = nullptr; gbuffer = graphicsWrapper->CreateFramebuffer(gbufferCI); // Bind glBindFramebuffer(GL_DRAW_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); // Draw here... // Bind to textures glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[1]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[2]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE3); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); Here is an extract of my code. I can't think of anything else to include. I've really been butting my head into a wall trying to think of a reason but I can think of none and all my research yields nothing. Thanks in advance!
    • By Adrianensis
      Hi everyone, I've shared my 2D Game Engine source code. It's the result of 4 years working on it (and I still continue improving features ) and I want to share with the community. You can see some videos on youtube and some demo gifs on my twitter account.
      This Engine has been developed as End-of-Degree Project and it is coded in Javascript, WebGL and GLSL. The engine is written from scratch.
      This is not a professional engine but it's for learning purposes, so anyone can review the code an learn basis about graphics, physics or game engine architecture. Source code on this GitHub repository.
      I'm available for a good conversation about Game Engine / Graphics Programming
    • By C0dR
      I would like to introduce the first version of my physically based camera rendering library, written in C++, called PhysiCam.
      Physicam is an open source OpenGL C++ library, which provides physically based camera rendering and parameters. It is based on OpenGL and designed to be used as either static library or dynamic library and can be integrated in existing applications.
       
      The following features are implemented:
      Physically based sensor and focal length calculation Autoexposure Manual exposure Lense distortion Bloom (influenced by ISO, Shutter Speed, Sensor type etc.) Bokeh (influenced by Aperture, Sensor type and focal length) Tonemapping  
      You can find the repository at https://github.com/0x2A/physicam
       
      I would be happy about feedback, suggestions or contributions.

  • Popular Now