• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
xlope01

Why SV_ClipDistance[n] cost so much performance?

2 posts in this topic

I want to Clip some geometry from some objects but the performance hit is huge.

 

for example a model with around 1000 triangles will now cost around 2.5 times more time to render. That is not really a problem if i want to apply the SV_ClipDistance in a small number of models, but if I want to do it in many models or models that have many triangles then the over all performance will get significant worst.(let say I do this SV_ClipDistance in everything that is on the screen then the fps will pretty much drop 2.5 times)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never used it, however I have some ideas:

 

- In your tests how many clip planes are you using? How are you measuring performance? What graphics card are you testing on? Does your test use a realistic pixel shader?

 

- Instead of looking at the relative cost, it's generally more useful to look at the absolute cost. For example "clipping 1,000,000 polys takes an extra 1ms" or whatever the actual numbers are. That's because going from say 0.01ms to 0.025ms while a big factor slower will probably be an insignificant proportion of the total frame time.

 

- It's simple to implement clip planes in the pixel shader, and it doesn't take many instructions. If you're vertex bound and not pixel bound it might be quicker that way. The code is something like:

if (dot(plane, position) < 0) discard;

 

- Where possible, it should be cheaper to adjust the standard near and far clip planes, instead of adding new clip planes.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-I want to clip the height of the models so the SV_POSITION in pixel shader is only going to clip the near and far.

 

-I measuring performance by the time it take to render my reflection texture, with the SV_ClipDistance(clip the height of the models) to get the correct water reflection from the models. (so i use one clip plane that represent the water level)

 

-GPU i currently use is a HD7950.

 

-pixel shader(that I use for my water reflection texture) is under realistic load (shadows, lighting, specular, fog, reflection, etc)

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0