I am making a small RPG with limited multiplayer. In science fiction RPGs, I can revive players from death with technology: cloning, reconstruction of body etc. In fantasy RPGs, there is always magic: resurrection spell, healing spells etc.

How do we revive players in semi-realistic RPGs that does not have high technology or magic?

One way to do it is to say the player didn't die, he or she gets seriously injured and later recovers. But I am really hoping to have death and macabre ways to die in my game, so this is out. An alternative is to have the player control a team instead: a team member can go out, adventure, dies and be replaced. But this is loses a lot of immersion and role-playing since everyone is controlling generic team members.

I will be so grateful if someone has any other ideas?

I would suggest you take a page from the XCOM series. Perma death can add more immersion than any ressurection method can ever achieve. If you have spent the past several missions to perfect the skills and such of Character 'Y' to perfection and suddenly that character dies, you will suffer an enormous feeling of loss. You made that character, you loved that character, but now it is gone, never to be seen again. Sense of loss is a truly powerful feeling, which should never be ignored.

Futhermore, perma death is in fact a feature quite a few gamers truly enjoy, because as mentioned it adds to the immersion, but also adds value to each individual character, which is often not present when characters just ressurect once a mission is over. Because, why worry if he'll be back up on his/her feet when all this is over? Of course, while quite a few players enjoy this aspect, others do not because they cannot cope with that sense of loss in a game. However, this choice of course should be made based on the audience you want to attract for your game.

If you want resurrection, sometimes it is better to just not explain. This time I refer to the gamer favourite Skyrim. If you die in Skyrim, it just reloads a previous saved game state, you just restart. No magic, no gods, no science, no explanation whatsoever. It is just a reset so the player can try again.

I hope this rambling helped you in some way!

weymiensN

I'd actually go for permadeath.

That said, if you insist on bringing this up, you can introduce modern-time sci-fi elements such as ways to reanimate the body within a short period of time, or using T-Virus like components.

What purpose would reviving the character serve in your game precisely? How would it be approached from a Lore perspective?

The way I see it, people could react differently based on the amount of times you've been revived, sort of like if they were faced with Frankenstein sort of, except its progressive.

You could use a vampire-like approach, where the player is a sort of immortal in a way (after all, Vampires were scary at first because they appeared plausible).

As you mentioned you could provide an EMT style skill to help with non-catastrophic death which would provide a dead player the chance to remain unconscious for a minute or two and then some type of emergency service point like a hospital or ambulance station which gives them a chance to be stabilized. It would be an interesting mechanic if the team had to interrupt their fight for a short time to drag their dead comrades out, plug any holes, pump them up with adrenaline, restart their heart, then carry them out to be picked up by the meat wagon. If there was perma death teams would be that much more reluctant to venture into dangerous areas too far from emergency services. Having a good healer (medic) on the team would be quite important.

Catastrophic death would still be catastrophic but that would also lend to more conservative strategies by the team because they would take great pains to ensure the fight was stacked in their favor. You would probably need to really emphasize the "new" death dynamic in training missions.

Thanks for the input! A few points to clarify:

1) The game is designed around death and getting killed: you try to avoid gruesome deaths but this isn't always possible, I expect players to die a lot - even intentionally to collect achievements. But it isn't a "hardcore perma-death" RPG where you spend hours or even days leveling up your character, only to have everything wiped out when you die. The game will be designed in such a way that when you die and start over, you actually don't lose a lot - hypothetical example: the more enemies you kill, the higher your score is, so the goal is to get the highest possible score before dying.

2) Reviving the character in my game serves the purpose of letting the player continue playing the game basically. Its multiplayer so no saved games. This thread was meant to sort out how this will function Lore-wise.

Right now I think I will go with weymiensn's suggestion: let the player die permanently. Then, restart then over with the same player name and appearance. With zero explanation given! If anyone asks, I will blatantly tell them their character is auto-saved every time you start an adventure and reloaded when you die - just like in a Single player game.

While I am happy you are going with the simplest approach, which in my opinion for your case would be best, is to ignore any attempt to explain ressurection whatsoever. I do want to post a follow up on your post.

When you started this topic you chose as title "reviving/resurrecting players in a semi-realistic rpg". Because, you wanted a more realistic approach you basically eliminated the ability to ressurect/revive from a deceased state, since that is pretty unrealistic. Now in your follow up post, I have to question just how realistic is your game? I cannot imagine any realistic situation where you could explain the need for someone to intentionally die, unless he/she is suicidal.

Since your game is from what I can tell a shoot 'em up type of game, I really do not think you will have to bother with explaining why the player can try again and again. These type of games are carried by the impact the action has, never their story and/or lore. Though more experienced people with this genre can probably give examples that refute my point. What you need to focus on is thus the impact of the game, ensuring the killing is fun and you can do it in a numerous fun and creative ways, because if you make that part boring your game will fail.

I have been told Killing Floor is a great example of the genre, perhaps check it out, though I think you already have.

Conclusion for this is to focus on the killing and less on the lore, because in shoot 'em ups the action/flow is what is important.

I have been told Killing Floor is a great example of the genre, perhaps check it out, though I think you already have.

Conclusion for this is to focus on the killing and less on the lore, because in shoot 'em ups the action/flow is what is important.

Very good advice. +1!

Yeah, I used to play a lot of Killing Floor (KF). And I totally forgot that in KF, you die over and over again but still retain the same name/handle and continue having the same experience/level. Brilliant. Thanks! And yep, you are right. I am making something like KF. And while there is going to be some story and lore, it is not going to be a person one - the player does not physically experience the story first hand.

There's a game Kongregate (anybody, feel free to jump in with the name) where its essentially a roguelike. You pick a class and race and go down the floors, leveling up.

When you die, you lose everything (gold, weapons, etc) but you unlock an 'epiteth'.

When you start a new character you can use 2 or 3 epiteths (provided you've unlocked them) and they alter your initial skills and stats.

Essentially, you have to die 3 times to get the best epiteths and add them to your final character.

Maybe that could help?