• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Endemoniada

Are the D3DX Functions Faster ?

9 posts in this topic

Hi guys,

 

I thought I once read that you should always use the D3DX functions (like D3DXMatrixMultiply, D3DXMatrixRotationQuaternion, etc.) instead of your own because they are, or could be, faster. Is that true ?

 

Thanks.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're not experienced at writing a math library, then don't expect to write one that's going to be better than D3DX. It's more likely you'll end up with something slower and buggier.

I'll also point out that there's a newer replacement for D3DX math, called DirectXMath.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably worth noting that the D3DX library has been deprecated; fine if you want to continue using the older SDK, but it'd be better to switch over earlier if you ever plan on updating. The newer SDK still has the most of the same functionality, just a few bits and pieces here and there that work slightly differently e.g. XMMatrixMultiply instead of D3DXMatrixMultiply.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I once tried to make my own small matrix math library, because I needed just few basic operations and didn't want to include the whole D3DX for it. When I implemented matrix multiplication I was quite surprised that it indeed was slower (I don't remember how much, but it was quite noticable).

And multiplication is a very simple algorithm, there really isn't much room for mistakes.

 

The reason is that functions like D3DXMatrixMultiply are written directly in asm and are using SSE.

 

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/430741-d3dxmatrixmultiply-implimentation/

Edited by Tom KQT
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably worth noting that the D3DX library has been deprecated; fine if you want to continue using the older SDK, but it'd be better to switch over earlier if you ever plan on updating. The newer SDK still has the most of the same functionality, just a few bits and pieces here and there that work slightly differently e.g. XMMatrixMultiply instead of D3DXMatrixMultiply.

Also the newer one is using intrinsics in the back end to make use of SSE2 which is in 99% of the CPU's nowadays. Btw if you turn SSE2 code generation on in the compiler settings your own matrix code will also be converted to make use of SSE2, however the XM versions will most likely be faster.

 

I once tried to make my own small matrix math library, because I needed just few basic operations and didn't want to include the whole D3DX for it. When I implemented matrix multiplication I was quite surprised that it indeed was slower (I don't remember how much, but it was quite noticable).

And multiplication is a very simple algorithm, there really isn't much room for mistakes.

 

The reason is that functions like D3DXMatrixMultiply are written directly in asm and are using SSE.

 

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/430741-d3dxmatrixmultiply-implimentation/

The D3DX ones actually aren't using SSE, that's why XNAmath and the later rename to DirectxMath library is created as that is using SSE2 intrinsics to do most of it's operations. As the D3DX and XNAmath definitions of the primitive types are substantially different when you actually look at the headers that implement it. The XNA one is doing all kinds of stuff to figure out whether or not SSE is support or not and if it is it switches to __m128 members in most structures.

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are some very nice anwsers guys, especially concerning SSE. I wrote a bunch of functions I needed, really to learn the math, it took an hour or two; then I realized DirectX handles it's matrices differently than the norm so before I rewrote my function I thought I'd ask this question. I also didn't know D3DX was depricated. I definitely want to use the new library.

 

I'm using C++ and D3D9 (VS2012 with the June2010 DirectX SDK), can I use DirectXMath with that or do I have to use XNA or D3D10 or 11 ?

 

Thanks a lot.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DirectxMath and XNAmath are the same library and should be included with the June SDK, could be you have to include the xnamath.h as the header for it as the rename happened more or less arround the time that DirectX SDK was changed to be a component of the Windows SDK.

 

If you just transpose the matrices you wrote yourself before you feed them to D3D they should just work as that is how you switch from column major to row major which D3D9 likes.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also look into the DirectX Tool Kit, which provides a lot of functionality similar to XNA, but for C++. This includes their "SimpleMath" library, which is a thin wrapper over DXMath/XMath that provides a simpler interface that might be more to your liking. It also provides useful things like sprite fonts, sprite batching, a shader effects framework with common effects, and more.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also look into the DirectX Tool Kit, which provides a lot of functionality similar to XNA, but for C++. This includes their "SimpleMath" library, which is a thin wrapper over DXMath/XMath that provides a simpler interface that might be more to your liking. It also provides useful things like sprite fonts, sprite batching, a shader effects framework with common effects, and more.

The effect system is already in the SDK you just have to compile it yourself, this was done so you could tweak it to your own likings instead of being stuck with a massive lib that you had to link in. You can find this in the Samples directory under C++ and then Effects11.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0