• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JLW

Reputation system is glitched

12 posts in this topic

In the last two minutes, my reputation have fallen nearly forty points. It says it's all from one thread, but I looked and not only do the numbers not match up, my reputation kept dropping.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears one member went and downvoted 9 of your posts in this thread in the last hour or so. So this is the reason you lost reputation. I won't disclose who this member is because it isn't my place to, but just letting you know what happened and that the reputation loss isn't a technical glitch.

 

However, note that when it says -3, I believe it's actually -4 unless the downvoter has negative reputation, this hasn't been fixed yet so the numbers displayed in the log don't quite match up (that said, no events are missing). So that would be the bug, and I think it has been reported (maybe a staff member can give an update) smile.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read the thread contents, I just skimmed through the votes.

 

Yes, a particular member went on a down-vote rampage against your posts in that thread, but your posts were also sporadically downvoted by a wide variety of different users.

 

It's not cool for unnamed-user to go on a downvote rampage like that, but going off all the other (seemingly legit) downvotes that you received in that thread, perhaps you were being argumentative or using an unproductive attitude? I've undone just the rampage votes, but try and re-read the thread to find out why so many different people found your posts to be disagreeable.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just confirming what Bacterius suggested: there is a known issue where reputation changes of + or - 4 points are recorded in the log as + or - 3 points -- this is a display error in the log only, and the system otherwise works as intended as far as changes to rep and in-topic vote-counts go.  It's on the to-do list and we will get to fixing it, but this is relatively low priority.

 

The reputation log is also subject to caching and can have a (usually fairly brief) delay between votes being made in topics and showing up in the log.  We consider this acceptable, and allows the site to remain more responsive in more time-critical areas.

 

Thanks for the report Jeremy!

 

 

I'll also look into the apparent down-vote rampage and have a word with the user in question if appropriate -- we don't enforce particular conditions and restrictions on usage of the system, but we do take action when we notice persistent usage that isn't consistent with the spirit in which it was intended.

 

 

If I might offer a little more unsolicited advice*, you might consider Hodgman's advice of thinking about why numerous users are down-voting your posts.  To me, you sometimes come across as overly defensive and somewhat abrasive, choosing a combative rather than friendly tone.  As a specific example, when someone suggested easing off the hostility you responded by noting that you were "returning fire", but you'll probably find most people would strongly disagree that the original post you were responding to (reply #21) was at all hostile.  For future reference, it's actually you who is mistaken about the commonly used definition of "production value" (additional source, and another).  Whilst I agree it certainly wouldn't be the norm, I also think it's not that unthinkable that an inexperienced group of players might have a turn in table-top D&D stretch out to around an hour -- the combination of possibly having to look up numerous things, being unsure of where to look those things up, having one or more discussions deciding how to interpret those rules, considering multiple unfamiliar options, and some slower maths, perhaps with some interruptions could easily lead to this result.  Turns at my weekly game are usually 1-5 minutes, very occasionally stretching out to 10-15 if we get distracted mid-decision; other people's experiences can easily differ from this, especially if the vast majority of your own experience was with the same group of players.

 

Perhaps start off with the default assumption that people aren't attacking you, and ease off a little on the defensiveness and hostility.  It's possible to have a disagreement without being so abrasive.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not certain, but it appears to still be acting weird. I'm probably wrong, and it's probably nothing, but I learned long ago not to take things at face value and I *hate* surprises.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll take a careful look and make sure nothing is amiss -- I'll reply again to let you know what's discovered, but I probably won't get to it immediately. smile.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll go on record and say I've downvoted (I believe) 3 different replies that were clearly unfit in tone and off topic.

Ramblings and arguments tend to drive conversations off topic, and being the original poster doesn't make you immune to turning an otherwise interesting topic into a mess hall.

There was general misconduct and lack of ethic in your replies, and it turned an otherwise interesting thread into a flame wars, which I particularly never encourage.

I've downvoted these specific posts as a result.

If you have an issue with that, come to me directly, whining on the board about being downvoted is just as mature as pretending you didn't light the fire.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll go on record and say I've downvoted (I believe) 3 different replies that were clearly unfit in tone and off topic.

Ramblings and arguments tend to drive conversations off topic, and being the original poster doesn't make you immune to turning an otherwise interesting topic into a mess hall.

There was general misconduct and lack of ethic in your replies, and it turned an otherwise interesting thread into a flame wars, which I particularly never encourage.

I've downvoted these specific posts as a result.

If you have an issue with that, come to me directly, whining on the board about being downvoted is just as mature as pretending you didn't light the fire.

 

I made this post because I suspected either a glitch or a single user abusing the system, and I was RIGHT. I was right, and this was confirmed by multiple moderators. Of course, you missed that part entirely, didn't you? What, were you too busy passing judgement to observe information? Are you so full of yourself that you feel you don't need to read a thread to know what it is about? Or are you so set in your opinion that no amount of evidence to the contrary can possibly sway you?

 

Basically, I'm asking you, personally, what in the FUCK is wrong with you?

Edited by Jeremy Williams
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'll go on record and say I've downvoted (I believe) 3 different replies that were clearly unfit in tone and off topic.

Ramblings and arguments tend to drive conversations off topic, and being the original poster doesn't make you immune to turning an otherwise interesting topic into a mess hall.

There was general misconduct and lack of ethic in your replies, and it turned an otherwise interesting thread into a flame wars, which I particularly never encourage.

I've downvoted these specific posts as a result.

If you have an issue with that, come to me directly, whining on the board about being downvoted is just as mature as pretending you didn't light the fire.

 

I made this post because I suspected either a glitch or a single user abusing the system, and I was RIGHT. I was right, and this was confirmed by multiple moderators. Of course, you missed that part entirely, didn't you? What, were you too busy passing judgement to observe information? Are you so full of yourself that you feel you don't need to read a thread to know what it is about? Or are you so set in your opinion that no amount of evidence to the contrary can possibly sway you?

 

Basically, I'm asking you, personally, what in the FUCK is wrong with you?

 

not going to be making many friends with that attitude.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I made this post because I suspected either a glitch or a single user abusing the system, and I was RIGHT. I was right, and this was confirmed by multiple moderators. Of course, you missed that part entirely, didn't you? What, were you too busy passing judgement to observe information? Are you so full of yourself that you feel you don't need to read a thread to know what it is about? Or are you so set in your opinion that no amount of evidence to the contrary can possibly sway you?

Orymus3 is perfectly entitled to use the reputation system for the purposes which it was designed for. The system is not being abused. I concur with their observations, for what it's worth.

 


Basically, I'm asking you, personally, what in the FUCK is wrong with you?

Calm down, that is an (unofficial) warning.

 

Looking at your behaviour in this and the linked thread, it seems to me that you are going to find yourself removed from the community unless you can tone down some of your more extreme comments. If you disagree with someone, you can state it clearly and calmly in a reasonable manner, do not resort to SHOUTING and personal attacks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm going to lock this thread too, for your own good. It seems to only be drawing further attention to your other thread, and that seems to be just earning further down votes.

 

If you have any other questions or bug/abuse reports about the reputation system, feel free to contact a moderator. I would note that, personally, I would be disinclined to take a sympathetic view of members who are being down voted due to their own aggressive behaviour.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Not certain, but it appears to still be acting weird.

Just confirming there are no additional problems (other than the known issue of values incorrectly displaying as -3 rather than -4) or apparent abuses of the system -- you've just been down-voted by additional users who apparently objected to some of your behaviour, which is a perfectly valid and intended use of the system.

 

 

For reference, reacting as you did in reply #9 of this very topic is exactly the sort of behaviour people object to, and isn't really an acceptable reaction to someone who chose to volunteer feedback on why he had personally contributed to your falling reputation.  It's perfectly understandable that people (myself among them in a couple of the worst cases) are choosing to down-vote some of your posts given your unfriendly and defensive attitude, and even the user who went on the "down-voting rampage" had only picked out posts where you were reacting questionably.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0