• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL Connundrum

This topic is 1653 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I'm looking for some opinions on a cunnundrum I came across today.  This applies to a project that I'm in no position to change the parameters, so please don't offer suggestions along those lines.

 

The project, which has been in development for about a year, uses OpenGL 2.1 with GLSL 1.20.  Today, it was discovered that it will not run on Win 8 machines which do not have an OpenGL driver (this can happen for numerous reason, e.g. a user installs Win 8 over Win 7 without checking for newer drivers).  In this case, Win 8 will attempt to emulate OpenGL version 1.1 through GDI.  The project specification states that it must work under this scenario.

 

So, it seems that I'm left with two options:  either create a branch that uses GL 1.1 (currently, my rendering is done in shaders, so this seems substantial) or create a DirectX branch.  Neither seems appealing, but which would be better (least evil)?  Going GL 1.1 seams faster to develop, but the results will look pretty ugly.  Is there another route that I'm missing?

 

Regards!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

If the user's machine doesn't meet the requirements, why not tell them so? It is entirely expected to be asked to download current drivers if the drivers are out of date.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may also encounter problems with "switchable graphics" laptops, particularly those with AMD GPUs, where driver support is quite poor.

 

I have to oppose to this, I've got a laptop with Mobility Radeon HD 5470 and driver fully supports OpenGL 4.2 and some further extensions. Of course the performance of F.e. tessellation is imcomparable to F.e. Radeon 6870 that I've got in desktop, but...

 

Even further, the Linux drivers (as I'm mainly Linux user, but run both major OS on my computers) supports same version of OpenGL and same extensions.

 

EDIT: Although I can't state about older AMD gpus...

Edited by Vilem Otte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info mhagain.

 

The spec states specifically that we cannot require changes to the user machine to use the software, so requiring a driver update is out of the question (FWIW, we can't even recommend this).

 

Unfortunately, this project must also be portable (including GL ES), which is why I didn't want to go the D3D route.   Maintaining two code paths sounds horrible, but I think I can do the D3D "emulation" layer with a lot less effort.  Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, this project must also be portable (including GL ES), which is why I didn't want to go the D3D route.   Maintaining two code paths sounds horrible, but I think I can do the D3D "emulation" layer with a lot less effort.  Cheers!

 

Looks like ANGLE is the solution you want then; just use your ES2.0 path on Windows and send it through ANGLE to handle the emulation.

 

I have to oppose to this, I've got a laptop with Mobility Radeon HD 5470 and driver fully supports OpenGL 4.2 and some further extensions. Of course the performance of F.e. tessellation is imcomparable to F.e. Radeon 6870 that I've got in desktop, but...

 

Even further, the Linux drivers (as I'm mainly Linux user, but run both major OS on my computers) supports same version of OpenGL and same extensions.

 

I wouldn't dispute that it works fine for you, but it is a fact that AMD switchable graphics drivers on Windows have historically been a massive PITA for many users, with AMD themselves not even supporting updates using their regular driver packages.(see e.g. http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/AMDCatalystSoftwareSuiteVersion126ReleaseNotes.aspx and note the section headed "The following notebooks are not compatible with this release").  See here for more discussion.

 

It's all irrelevant anyway as the OP has made it clear that no changes to the user PC is part of the requirements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm unable to use ANGLE, although it looks really interesting.  If I do go the D3D emulation route, I'd have to incorporate it into our libraries.  So, I'll wait a bit longer to see if another suggestion comes up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like your core issue is not having your render code abstracted enough.

 

Off the top of my head something like:

class IVertexBuffer { // Abstract Base Class 
     void Bind() = 0;
     void Unbind() = 0;
}

class GL2xVertexBuffer {
    // Contains a VAO
}

class GL1xVertexBuffer {
    // Contains a list of vertices
}

class IIndexBuffer { // Again abstract
   void DrawCall() = 0;
}

// Subclass that draws gl2x path, subclass that draws gl1x path

class IMaterial { // Still Abstract
    bool m_bIsLit;
    Color m_colorAmbient;
    Color m_colorDiffuse;
    Color m_colorSpecular;

    void SetState() = 0;
    void ClearState();
}

class GL2xMaterial {
    void SetState(); // Bind shader, bind shader properties
}

class GL1xMaterial {
    void SetState(); // Configure fixed function states
}

void Render(IVertexBuffer& vertexBuffer, IIndexBuffer& indexBuffer, IMaterial& material) {
    material.SetState();
    renderBuffer.Bind();
    indexBuffer.DrawCall();
    renderBuffer.Unbind();
    material.ClearState();
}

Sounds like what your assignment really wants. Then you just need some utility code:

IVertexBuffer* CreateVertexBuffer() {
    if (g_bSystemSupportsGl2X)
         return new GL2xVertexBuffer();
    return new GL1xVertexBuffer();
}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sounds like your core issue is not having your render code abstracted enough.

 

That's not going to solve the problem of a Windows PC without a proper OpenGL driver going through software emulation and getting 1fps though.

 

Yes, one could use such an abstraction to include a D3D layer relatively easily, but there are complexities that - if you come at it primarily with a GL hat on - are going to cause you trouble:

  • No requirement for "bind to modify" in D3D.
  • Shader uniforms are per-program object in GL, global-and-shared in D3D.
  • Differences between D3D "streams" and GL "attribs".
  • Hardware capabilities that D3D enforces but GL emulates in software if absent.
  • Etc etc etc.

@OP - is the reason for not being able to use ANGLE the BSD license?  TitaniumGL is another option that's freeware but only supports GL1.4; no shaders but better at least than software-emulated 1.1 (I've little experience of it so can't vouch for it's quality).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing is going to solve the problem of not having proper drivers. Nothing.

 

From the original post i gather that the game must work under OpenGL 1.1 emulated environment (Hence no ANGLE). There was no mention of it needing to be performant. 

 

 

It honestly sounds to me like the idea of the assignment is to implement multiple render paths, which is what the poster seems to want to avoid.

 

Could be wrong tough....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mesa (http://www.mesa3d.org/) should provide horribly slow but advanced software rendering, allowing you to meet the UNREASONABLE requirement of not installing drivers without abandoning OpenGL 2.1 (which is already highly obsolete).

This advice is only a fallback from my real advice, which is running away from such a project/team/company and letting your (former) manager deal with self-imposed trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OP - is the reason for not being able to use ANGLE the BSD license?  TitaniumGL is another option that's freeware but only supports GL1.4; no shaders but better at least than software-emulated 1.1 (I've little experience of it so can't vouch for it's quality).

 

 

It has to do with more requirements, but that may be based on legal; I really don't know.  Thanks for the suggestions though!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


@OP - is the reason for not being able to use ANGLE the BSD license?  TitaniumGL is another option that's freeware but only supports GL1.4; no shaders but better at least than software-emulated 1.1 (I've little experience of it so can't vouch for it's quality).

 

 

It has to do with more requirements, but that may be based on legal; I really don't know.  Thanks for the suggestions though!

 

 

Couldn't you statically link to ANGLE for your Windows build?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update for anyone reading this in the future:  I implemented a GL 1.1 render path and the results were ~10fps @ 1080p and ~35fps @ 1280x1024.  This is compared to ~80fps and ~100fps when rendering as non-emulated GL 2.1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's bad, but not terrible. It is a shame the parameters of the project are so strict. There are easier ways...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
  • Advertisement