• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
slicer4ever

generic and overloads.

4 posts in this topic

having a bit of a problem with something i'd like to do in C#.  in c++ with templates it'd work, since the class would be compiled as w/e type it's being used for.  but in C# it seems that doesn't work in a similar manner.

 

here's what i'm trying to do: [url]http://ideone.com/D6Tgke[/url]

 

using System;
namespace Main{
    
    class Test<T>{
        
        public Test(T Value){
            X.Foo(Value);
        }
    }
    
    
    class X{
        public static void Foo(int value){
            Console.WriteLine("Foo Int: "+value);
        }
        
        public static void Foo(float value){
            Console.WriteLine("Foo Float: "+value);
        }
        
        public static void Main(){
            Test<float> f = new Test<float>(5.0f);
            Test<int> i = new Test<int>(5);
            return;
        }
    }
}

 

which gives me the following errors:

 

prog.cs(7,15): error CS1502: The best overloaded method match for `Main.X.Foo(int)' has some invalid arguments
prog.cs(13,28): (Location of the symbol related to previous error)
prog.cs(7,15): error CS1503: Argument `#1' cannot convert `T' expression to type `int'
Compilation failed: 2 error(s), 0 warnings

any tips on what i could do to achieve this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
C# generics are really cumbersome to use with value types.  As far as I know you have to move the type resolution from compile time to runtime. You could make an overload of X.Foo which takes an object and then calls the appropriate method using a series of "Value is Type" if/else statements. The easiest-to-implement hack I know of to get it to work is to use dynamic typing:
 
X.Foo((dynamic)Value);
Typically what I do instead is redesign the implementation so that the generic doesn't need to be used with value types. Sometimes this is pretty difficult, but often you will end up with code where the compiler is figuring everything out at compile time again, which is better.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C# generics are really cumbersome to use with value types.  As far as I know you have to move the type resolution from compile time to runtime. You could make an overload of X.Foo which takes an object and then calls the appropriate method using a series of "Value is Type" if/else statements. The easiest-to-implement hack I know of to get it to work is to use dynamic typing:
 

X.Foo((dynamic)Value);
Typically what I do instead is redesign the implementation so that the generic doesn't need to be used with value types. Sometimes this is pretty difficult, but often you will end up with code where the compiler is figuring everything out at compile time again, which is better.

 

 

I see, that's unfortunate that c# can't do compile-time type detection for generics .  hmm, so my options are to type-cast to an object, and use reflection, or to simple create a unique instance of each type of class(which would be quite cumbersome...).

 

i suppose i'll use the type-cast mechanism for now, and so long as i don't see any terrible performance hit, i should be alright.

 

also, dynamic doesn't seem to be a known keyword for the c# compiler i'm using atm.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I see, that's unfortunate that c# can't do compile-time type detection for generics .  

 

C# can absolutely do compile time type detection for generics (specifically method parameters). That's not what you're asking it to do with this code. You're looking for C++ style duck typing and expecting the code to be generated the same way it is for c++ templates. The two are very different.

 


 also, dynamic doesn't seem to be a known keyword for the c# compiler i'm using atm.

 

dynamic was introduced in .Net 4, I think. (VS2010)

 

Can you give a more concrete example of what you want to do? There may be better ways of solving the problem.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 


I see, that's unfortunate that c# can't do compile-time type detection for generics .  

 

C# can absolutely do compile time type detection for generics (specifically method parameters). That's not what you're asking it to do with this code. You're looking for C++ style duck typing and expecting the code to be generated the same way it is for c++ templates. The two are very different.

 

 


 also, dynamic doesn't seem to be a known keyword for the c# compiler i'm using atm.

 

dynamic was introduced in .Net 4, I think. (VS2010)

 

Can you give a more concrete example of what you want to do? There may be better ways of solving the problem.

 

the code i provided is a solid example.  i'm making an interface to PSM's shaderprogram, which has ~15 overloads of various uniform inputs(int's, floats, vector's, matrixs).  i created an material class, and then i can attach nodes to that material class(each node is a uniform, or a texture). the node has a uniform location/texture index, and a value(such as an int, float, vector, or matrix), and i use the generic to pass what type the value is suppose to be.  and then when i go to apply the value to the shader, i wanted it to choose the correct overload when passing the value into the shader.

 

i'm open to other possibilitys, but for now i'm simply using if-else branch to check the type.

Edited by slicer4ever
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0