Sign in to follow this  
Migi0027

DX11 DX11 - SSAO

Recommended Posts

Migi0027    4628

I'm so terribly sorry to re-re-re open this one, but I never fully succeeded at this one, SSAO. unsure.png

 

SSAO Shader:

Texture2D t_depthmap : register(t0);
Texture2D t_normalmap : register(t1);
Texture2D t_random : register(t2);
SamplerState ss;

cbuffer SSAOBuffer : register(c0)
{
	float g_scale;
	float g_bias;
	float g_sample_rad;
	float g_intensity;
	float ssaoIterations;
	float3 pppspace;

	matrix view;
};

struct VS_Output
{  
	float4 Pos : SV_POSITION;              
	float2 Tex : TEXCOORD0;
};
 
VS_Output VShader(uint id : SV_VertexID)
{
	VS_Output Output;
	Output.Tex = float2((id << 1) & 2, id & 2);
	Output.Pos = float4(Output.Tex * float2(2,-2) + float2(-1,1), 0, 1);
	return Output;
}

// Helper for modifying the saturation of a color.
float4 AdjustSaturation(float4 color, float saturation)
{
	// The constants 0.3, 0.59, and 0.11 are chosen because the
	// human eye is more sensitive to green light, and less to blue.
	float grey = dot(color, float3(0.3, 0.59, 0.11));

	return lerp(grey, color, saturation);
}

// Ambient Occlusion Stuff --------------------------------------------------

float3 getPosition(in float2 uv)
{
	return t_depthmap.Sample(ss, uv).xyz;
}

float3 getNormal(in float2 uv)
{
	return normalize(t_normalmap.Sample(ss, uv).xyz * 2.0f - 1.0f);
}

float2 getRandom(in float2 uv)
{
	//return normalize(t_random.Sample(ss, uv ).xy * 2.0f - 1.0f); // ~100FPS
	return normalize(t_random.Sample(ss, float2(600, 800) * uv / float2(60, 60)).xy * 2.0f - 1.0f);
}

float doAmbientOcclusion(in float2 tcoord,in float2 uv, in float3 p, in float3 cnorm)
{
	float3 diff = getPosition(tcoord + uv) - p;
	const float3 v = normalize(diff);
	const float d = length(diff)*g_scale;
	return max(0.0,dot(cnorm,v)-g_bias)*(1.0/(1.0+d))*g_intensity;
}

// End

float4 PShader(VS_Output input) : SV_TARGET
{
	// ADD SSAO ---------------------------------------------------------------
	const float2 vec[4] = {float2(1,0),float2(-1,0),
				float2(0,1),float2(0,-1)};

	float3 p = getPosition(input.Tex);
	float3 n = getNormal(input.Tex);
	float2 rand = getRandom(input.Tex);

	float ao = 0.0f;
	float rad = g_sample_rad/p.z; // g_s_r

	//**SSAO Calculation**//
	int iterations = 4;
	for (int j = 0; j < iterations; ++j)
	{
	  float2 coord1 = reflect(vec[j], rand)*rad;
	  float2 coord2 = float2(coord1.x*0.707 - coord1.y*0.707,
				  coord1.x*0.707 + coord1.y*0.707);
	  
	  ao += doAmbientOcclusion(input.Tex, coord1*0.25, p, n);
	  ao += doAmbientOcclusion(input.Tex, coord2*0.5, p, n);
	  ao += doAmbientOcclusion(input.Tex, coord1*0.75, p, n);
	  ao += doAmbientOcclusion(input.Tex, coord2, p, n);
	}
	ao /= (float)iterations*4.0;

	ao = saturate(ao);

	return float4(ao, ao, ao, 1.0f);
}

How I write my depth map to the ssao:

VS
output.depth = output.position.z / output.position.w;
PS
float depth = input.depth;
output.Depth = float4(depth, depth, depth, 1);

How i write my normal map to the ssao:

VS -- I think this is wrong
output.NormalW = mul(mul(worldMatrix, viewMatrix), float4(normal.xyz,0) );
PS
output.Normals = float4(input.NormalW, 1);

Render Result:

 

2ztay6g.png

 

Ehh.

 

Again, I'm so sorry for re-posting this, it's just, i really want this feature completed (well, working at least).

 

Thank You, like always...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
belfegor    2834

I think that that ssao shader needs view space position (whole three components x,y and z), as i can see you store normals that way, although:

output.NormalW = mul(mul(worldMatrix, viewMatrix), float4(normal.xyz,0) );

this mul order is right if shader packs matrices as column major, i don't know dx11  shader systems so i am not sure, but in dx9 i can force row major with this statement:

#pragma pack_matrix(row_major)

beacuse it matches my system in cpp code and i always mul vectors with matrices this way:

result = mul( vec, matrix );
Edited by belfegor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Migi0027    4628

Ok, it is a bit better now in the sense that it doesn't just become randomly black: (SSAO Map)

 

2vjsx8h.png

 

 

But this isn't right yet, well I don't think it is, I mean look at the left of the cube, where the left side is rendered, it's black, why?

 

Ohh, and belfegor, about the matrices, you were right!

 

How I write my depth map to the ssao:

VS:

output.position = mul(position, worldMatrix);
output.position = mul(output.position, viewMatrix);
output.position = mul(output.position, projectionMatrix);

output.NormalW = mul(float4(-normal.xyz,0), mul(worldMatrix, viewMatrix));

// Store the position value in a second input value for depth value calculations.
output.depthPosition = output.position;
PS:

// Depth
float depth = 1.0f - (input.depthPosition.z / input.depthPosition.w);
output.Depth = float4(depth, depth, depth, 1.0f);

// Normals
output.Normals = float4(input.NormalW, 1); 

Now, is this the correct way to map the depth and the normal maps?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
belfegor    2834

I said output view space position, so it is like this:

VS
output.depthPosition.xyz = mul(float4(position.xyz,1), mul(worldMatrix, viewMatrix)).xyz;
PS
output.Depth = float4(input.depthPosition.xyz, 1.0f);

although you must have proper render target (or "view" whatever they call it in dx11) format that can hold at least 3 floating point components.

 

And why do you invert your normals now?

output.NormalW = mul(float4(-normal.xyz,0), mul(worldMatrix, viewMatrix));

Then when you fix those issues, play with ssao "sampling radius" to match your world scale (in case you don't get expected results).

Edited by belfegor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
belfegor    2834

Let me try this one with my renderer and i get back to you. smile.png

 

EDIT: Here is it (on and off). All parameters are same as yours except radius which i set to 0.1f (10cm in my world) since it feels more natural for me.

 

oma-2013-07-18-20-47-50-.jpg

oma-2013-07-18-20-47-53-.jpg

Edited by belfegor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
belfegor    2834

I played a little more with this and done some changes that look better then before (at least for me), so you might want to try:

1. I have normalized view space normals in texture, and i don't get why do we need to scale-bias here? Also, this fixes some ugly artifacts.

float3 getNormal(in float2 uv)
{
    //return normalize(tex2D(gbNormal_samp, uv).xyz * 2.0f - 1.0f);
    return tex2D(gbNormal_samp, uv).xyz;
}

So you might need to change your gbuffer normal to be normalized also

output.Normals = float4(normalize(input.NormalW), 1);

 

2. I had getRandom before which looks nice for me:

float3 getRandom(in float2 uv)
{
    return tex2D(rand_samp, uv * ScreenParams.xy / 4.0f).xyz * 2.0f - 1.0f;
}

3. Setting scale to 0 looks better for me, so i can even remove some calculations:

float doAmbientOcclusion(in float2 tcoord,in float2 uv, in float3 p, in float3 cnorm)
{
    float g_scale = SSAO_params.x;
    float g_bias = SSAO_params.y;
    float g_intensity = SSAO_params.z;

    float3 diff = getPosition(tcoord + uv) - p;
    const float3 v = normalize(diff);
    //const float d = length(diff)*g_scale;
    return max(0.0,dot(cnorm,v)-g_bias)*g_intensity;//(1.0/(1.0+d))*g_intensity;
}

4. I get strange "haloing" artifacts on screen corners, so i set position and normal texture UV addressing mode to mirror and it seems that fixes that issue.

 

5. Changed radius to 0.15 and intensity to ~2.5

Edited by belfegor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Migi0027    4628

The reason for the false occlusions at the corners is simply because there is nothing in the scene there,

 

2db9ok1.png

 

But as you see in the bottom, when I go too close to the mesh, these false occlusions start to appear, and when really close, they're everywhere!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By isu diss
       I'm trying to code Rayleigh part of Nishita's model (Display Method of the Sky Color Taking into Account Multiple Scattering). I get black screen no colors. Can anyone find the issue for me?
       
      #define InnerRadius 6320000 #define OutterRadius 6420000 #define PI 3.141592653 #define Isteps 20 #define Ksteps 10 static float3 RayleighCoeffs = float3(6.55e-6, 1.73e-5, 2.30e-5); RWTexture2D<float4> SkyColors : register (u0); cbuffer CSCONSTANTBUF : register( b0 ) { float fHeight; float3 vSunDir; } float Density(float Height) { return exp(-Height/8340); } float RaySphereIntersection(float3 RayOrigin, float3 RayDirection, float3 SphereOrigin, float Radius) { float t1, t0; float3 L = SphereOrigin - RayOrigin; float tCA = dot(L, RayDirection); if (tCA < 0) return -1; float lenL = length(L); float D2 = (lenL*lenL) - (tCA*tCA); float Radius2 = (Radius*Radius); if (D2<=Radius2) { float tHC = sqrt(Radius2 - D2); t0 = tCA-tHC; t1 = tCA+tHC; } else return -1; return t1; } float RayleighPhaseFunction(float cosTheta) { return ((3/(16*PI))*(1+cosTheta*cosTheta)); } float OpticalDepth(float3 StartPosition, float3 EndPosition) { float3 Direction = normalize(EndPosition - StartPosition); float RayLength = RaySphereIntersection(StartPosition, Direction, float3(0, 0, 0), OutterRadius); float SampleLength = RayLength / Isteps; float3 tmpPos = StartPosition + 0.5 * SampleLength * Direction; float tmp; for (int i=0; i<Isteps; i++) { tmp += Density(length(tmpPos)-InnerRadius); tmpPos += SampleLength * Direction; } return tmp*SampleLength; } static float fExposure = -2; float3 HDR( float3 LDR) { return 1.0f - exp( fExposure * LDR ); } [numthreads(32, 32, 1)] //disptach 8, 8, 1 it's 256 by 256 image void ComputeSky(uint3 DTID : SV_DispatchThreadID) { float X = ((2 * DTID.x) / 255) - 1; float Y = 1 - ((2 * DTID.y) / 255); float r = sqrt(((X*X)+(Y*Y))); float Theta = r * (PI); float Phi = atan2(Y, X); static float3 Eye = float3(0, 10, 0); float ViewOD = 0, SunOD = 0, tmpDensity = 0; float3 Attenuation = 0, tmp = 0, Irgb = 0; //if (r<=1) { float3 ViewDir = normalize(float3(sin(Theta)*cos(Phi), cos(Theta),sin(Theta)*sin(Phi) )); float ViewRayLength = RaySphereIntersection(Eye, ViewDir, float3(0, 0, 0), OutterRadius); float SampleLength = ViewRayLength / Ksteps; //vSunDir = normalize(vSunDir); float cosTheta = dot(normalize(vSunDir), ViewDir); float3 tmpPos = Eye + 0.5 * SampleLength * ViewDir; for(int k=0; k<Ksteps; k++) { float SunRayLength = RaySphereIntersection(tmpPos, vSunDir, float3(0, 0, 0), OutterRadius); float3 TopAtmosphere = tmpPos + SunRayLength*vSunDir; ViewOD = OpticalDepth(Eye, tmpPos); SunOD = OpticalDepth(tmpPos, TopAtmosphere); tmpDensity = Density(length(tmpPos)-InnerRadius); Attenuation = exp(-RayleighCoeffs*(ViewOD+SunOD)); tmp += tmpDensity*Attenuation; tmpPos += SampleLength * ViewDir; } Irgb = RayleighCoeffs*RayleighPhaseFunction(cosTheta)*tmp*SampleLength; SkyColors[DTID.xy] = float4(Irgb, 1); } }  
    • By Endurion
      I have a gaming framework with an renderer interface. Those support DX8, DX9 and latest, DX11. Both DX8 and DX9 use fixed function pipeline, while DX11 obviously uses shaders. I've got most of the parts working fine, as in I can switch renderers and notice almost no difference. The most advanced features are 2 directional lights with a single texture  
      My last problem is lighting; albeit there's documentation on the D3D lighting model I still can't get the behaviour right. My mistake shows most prominently in the dark side opposite the lights. I'm pretty sure the ambient calculation is off, but that one's supposed to be the most simple one and should be hard to get wrong.
      Interestingly I've been searching high and low, and have yet to find a resource that shows how to build a HLSL shader where diffuse, ambient and specular are used together with material properties. I've got various shaders for all the variations I'm supporting. I stepped through the shader with the graphics debugger, but the calculation seems to do what I want. I'm just not sure the formula is correct.
      This one should suffice though, it's doing two directional lights, texture modulated with vertex color and a normal. Maybe someone can spot one (or more mistakes). And yes, this is in the vertex shader and I'm aware lighting will be as "bad" as in fixed function; that's my goal currently.
      // A constant buffer that stores the three basic column-major matrices for composing geometry. cbuffer ModelViewProjectionConstantBuffer : register(b0) { matrix model; matrix view; matrix projection; matrix ortho2d; }; struct DirectionLight { float3 Direction; float PaddingL1; float4 Ambient; float4 Diffuse; float4 Specular; }; cbuffer LightsConstantBuffer : register( b1 ) { float4 Ambient; float3 EyePos; float PaddingLC1; DirectionLight Light[8]; }; struct Material { float4 MaterialEmissive; float4 MaterialAmbient; float4 MaterialDiffuse; float4 MaterialSpecular; float MaterialSpecularPower; float3 MaterialPadding; }; cbuffer MaterialConstantBuffer : register( b2 ) { Material _Material; }; // Per-vertex data used as input to the vertex shader. struct VertexShaderInput { float3 pos : POSITION; float3 normal : NORMAL; float4 color : COLOR0; float2 tex : TEXCOORD0; }; // Per-pixel color data passed through the pixel shader. struct PixelShaderInput { float4 pos : SV_POSITION; float2 tex : TEXCOORD0; float4 color : COLOR0; }; // Simple shader to do vertex processing on the GPU. PixelShaderInput main(VertexShaderInput input) { PixelShaderInput output; float4 pos = float4( input.pos, 1.0f ); // Transform the vertex position into projected space. pos = mul(pos, model); pos = mul(pos, view); pos = mul(pos, projection); output.pos = pos; // pass texture coords output.tex = input.tex; // Calculate the normal vector against the world matrix only. //set required lighting vectors for interpolation float3 normal = mul( input.normal, ( float3x3 )model ); normal = normalize( normal ); float4 ambientEffect = Ambient; float4 diffuseEffect = float4( 0, 0, 0, 0 ); float4 specularEffect = float4( 0, 0, 0, 0 ); for ( int i = 0; i < 2; ++i ) { // Invert the light direction for calculations. float3 lightDir = -Light[i].Direction; float lightFactor = max( dot( lightDir, input.normal ), 0 ); ambientEffect += Light[i].Ambient * _Material.MaterialAmbient; diffuseEffect += saturate( Light[i].Diffuse * dot( normal, lightDir ) );// * _Material.MaterialDiffuse; //specularEffect += Light[i].Specular * dot( normal, halfangletolight ) * _Material.MaterialSpecularPower; } specularEffect *= _Material.MaterialSpecular; //ambientEffect.w = 1.0; ambientEffect = normalize( ambientEffect ); /* Ambient effect: (L1.ambient + L2.ambient) * object ambient color Diffuse effect: (L1.diffuse * Dot(VertexNormal, Light1.Direction) + L2.diffuse * Dot(VertexNormal, Light2.Direction)) * object diffuse color Specular effect: (L1.specular * Dot(VertexNormal, HalfAngleToLight1) * Object specular reflection power + L2.specular * Dot(VertexNormal, HalfAngleToLight2) * Object specular reflection power ) * object specular color Resulting color = Ambient effect + diffuse effect + specular effect*/ float4 totalFactor = ambientEffect + diffuseEffect + specularEffect; totalFactor.w = 1.0; output.color = input.color * totalFactor; return output; }   Edit: This message editor is driving me nuts (Arrrr!) - I don't write code in Word.
    • By Mercesa
      Hey folks. So I'm having this problem in which if my camera is close to a surface, the SSAO pass suddenly spikes up to around taking 16 milliseconds.
      When still looking towards the same surface, but less close. The framerate resolves itself and becomes regular again.
      This happens with ANY surface of my model, I am a bit clueless in regards to what could cause this. Any ideas?
      In attached image: y axis is time in ms, x axis is current frame. The dips in SSAO milliseconds are when I moved away from the surface, the peaks happen when I am very close to the surface.

       
      Edit: So I've done some more in-depth profiling with Nvidia nsight. So these are the facts from my results
      Count of command buffers goes from 4 (far away from surface) to ~20(close to surface).
      The command buffer duration in % goes from around ~30% to ~99%
      Sometimes the CPU duration takes up to 0.03 to 0.016 milliseconds per frame while comparatively usually it takes around 0.002 milliseconds.
      I am using a vertex shader which generates my full-screen quad and afterwards I do my SSAO calculations in my pixel shader, could this be a GPU driver bug? I'm a bit lost myself. It seems there could be a CPU/GPU resource stall. But why would the amount of command buffers be variable depending on distance from a surface?
       
       
      Edit n2: Any resolution above 720p starts to have this issue, and I am fairly certain my SSAO is not that performance heavy it would crap itself at a bit higher resolutions.
       
    • By turanszkij
      In DirectX 11 we have a 24 bit integer depth + 8bit stencil format for depth-stencil resources ( DXGI_FORMAT_D24_UNORM_S8_UINT ). However, in an AMD GPU documentation for consoles I have seen they mentioned, that internally this format is implemented as a 64 bit resource with 32 bits for depth (but just truncated for 24 bits) and 32 bits for stencil (truncated to 8 bits). AMD recommends using a 32 bit floating point depth buffer instead with 8 bit stencil which is this format: DXGI_FORMAT_D32_FLOAT_S8X24_UINT.
      Does anyone know why this is? What is the usual way of doing this, just follow the recommendation and use a 64 bit depthstencil? Are there performance considerations or is it just recommended to not waste memory? What about Nvidia and Intel, is using a 24 bit depthbuffer relevant on their hardware?
      Cheers!
       
    • By gsc
      Hi! I am trying to implement simple SSAO postprocess. The main source of my knowledge on this topic is that awesome tutorial.
      But unfortunately something doesn't work... And after a few long hours I need some help. Here is my hlsl shader:
      float3 randVec = _noise * 2.0f - 1.0f; // noise: vec: {[0;1], [0;1], 0} float3 tangent = normalize(randVec - normalVS * dot(randVec, normalVS)); float3 bitangent = cross(tangent, normalVS); float3x3 TBN = float3x3(tangent, bitangent, normalVS); float occlusion = 0.0; for (int i = 0; i < kernelSize; ++i) { float3 samplePos = samples[i].xyz; // samples: {[-1;1], [-1;1], [0;1]} samplePos = mul(samplePos, TBN); samplePos = positionVS.xyz + samplePos * ssaoRadius; float4 offset = float4(samplePos, 1.0f); offset = mul(offset, projectionMatrix); offset.xy /= offset.w; offset.y = -offset.y; offset.xy = offset.xy * 0.5f + 0.5f; float sampleDepth = tex_4.Sample(textureSampler, offset.xy).a; sampleDepth = vsPosFromDepth(sampleDepth, offset.xy).z; const float threshold = 0.025f; float rangeCheck = abs(positionVS.z - sampleDepth) < ssaoRadius ? 1.0 : 0.0; occlusion += (sampleDepth <= samplePos.z + threshold ? 1.0 : 0.0) * rangeCheck; } occlusion = saturate(1 - (occlusion / kernelSize)); And current result: http://imgur.com/UX2X1fc
      I will really appreciate for any advice!
  • Popular Now