Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Questions about OpenGL

6 posts in this topic

Since Microsoft has killed PIX for windows without providing a free replacement, they have pretty much abandoned the hobbyist graphics programmer.


My questions are:


Are things any better in the OpenGL world?

What do you use to debug 3D graphics?

What (free) IDEs are you using?

Have any of you transitioned from DirectX to OpenGL?

What are the best books for learning current OpenGL?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Are things better? That depends on where you look. On the one hand, we just got 4.4 drivers from NVidia, and some of the ARB extensions in those include features that won't hit DirectX until 11.2... On the other hand, many parts of the OpenGL API move VERY slowly, meaning old concepts stay in use longer than they would in DirectX. (For example, it is just now kinda-sorta-almost getting away from the concept of working in terms of bind points for textures and buffers.) 


2) I've been using NVidia's parallel NSight to debug on windows, and it's worked pretty well for me so far (Visual Studio + Nvidia cards only, unfortunately). I have used GDEBugger in the past, but the original version died out, was picked up by AMD, and now exists as CodeXL. I can't comment on its newer incarnations, but historically it served well enough. It appears to run without VS, but probably requires an AMD card and Catalyst driver. Most of the open source projects on this front seem to have died out, unfortunately. 


3) I personally am a huge fan of Sublime Text for coding. It's a bit more of an editor than an IDE, and It's not free ($50 and worth every penny imo), but it's got an unlimited-length trial period, so you could learn it while saving money and not have a period where you're stuck without an editor. For Windows in particular, the express editions of Visual Studio have served me well over the years and are completely free.


4) I originally learned on DX9, and have since mostly used OpenGL due to jobs. If anything I'd say it feels like they are converging more and more, and the underlying concepts are often the same even though the APIs are laid out differently. You'd only stand to benefit from making the transition, even if you went right back to DirectX afterwards. 


5) I can't give any real recommendations for books, but I have thumbed through the OpenGL SuperBible, and it seemed reasonably thorough. The newest (6th) edition claims to cover up to 4.3, and will be out in a few days. Hopefully someone else here can speak to how useful it is for learning. 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used an older edition of a SuperBible in the past and thought it was fine enough, but it did tend to focus on it's own custom framework a bit too much.  I understand that recent editions are the same, so that's a fair advance warning for you.


This site ( is generally held to be the best online reference for modern OpenGL, so it's a good idea to give it a try before making any financial commitments.  I'm not certain how up to date it is with the 4.x stuff though.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This site ( is generally held to be the best online reference for modern OpenGL, so it's a good idea to give it a try before making any financial commitments.  I'm not certain how up to date it is with the 4.x stuff though.

It covers OpenGL 3.3, specifically core profile if I'm not mistaken.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an NVIDIA Nsight Eclipse edition, but as far as I can tell it's only avaiable for Mac and Linux. I don't know why they couldn't release a Windows version. It's frustrating for hobbyists on Windows who don't have the money to spend on Visual Studio.


[edit] Having a second look at the Nsight Eclipse edition I'm not sure it can be used to debug opengl applications, oh well. I just came across has anyone used this? Is it any good?

Edited by sunnysideup

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Freezee
      Hi, I'm 16 years old (nearly 17) french guy who loves coding, and pizzas, and music, and a lot of other things...
      I started learning some programming languages 6 years ago, and always failed to achieve something with them. Then I decided to re-try Java 2 years ago, and it went pretty well. So well that from this time I did not stopped programming. I really started to dig into C++ a year ago because I wanted lower level programming skills, with one specific goal: create games. Unfortunately I always overestimate myself and my ideas, and I've not been able to create a single real game because of my lack of experience in that specific domain. So I'm looking for a 3D FPS game project (multiplayer would be great too) to see how that kind of project is managed, and to finally be able to create something. I would like for once to work with other people on the same thing, I think it could really help me to help back the others. I have a lot of free time right now and I'm ready to spend some (if not a lot) into a project.
      I learned a lot of C++ features when I started, but I feel like I'm missing a lot of other features and I want to learn them on something useful.
      I really prefer not working on a project with a pre-used game engine (GM, UE, Unity, ...) because for me the most interesting part is what happens at the lowest programming level of a game. I learned basics of modern OpenGL so if there is a graphical engine to improve, I can work on it. I'm also very interested into working on the game engine structure, and on implementing a scripting language if it's needed. If the game is multiplayer, I will not guarantee that I could really work on that (because I really don't know a lot about networking) but I'll try my best to continue learning things and maybe work on that too.
      If you're interested, feel free to contact me on Discord: Freezee#2283. If you don't have Discord, reply back a way to contact you
    • By Jon Alma
      Some time ago I implemented a particle system using billboarding techniques to ensure that the particles are always facing the viewer.  These billboards are always centered on one 3d coordinate.
      I would like to build on this and use billboarding as the basis for things like laser bolts and gunshots.  Here the difference is that instead of a single point particle I now have to draw a billboard between two points - the start and end of the laser bolt for example.  I appreciate that having two end points places limits on how much the billboard can be rotated to face the viewer, but I'm looking to code a best effort solution.  For the moment I am struggling to work out how to do this or find any tutorials / code examples that explain how to draw a billboard between two points ... can anyone help?
    • By Sagaceil
      It's always better to fight with a bro.
    • By recp
      I'm working on new asset importer ( based on COLLADA specs, the question is not about COLLADA directly
      also I'm working on a new renderer to render ( imported document.
      In the future I'll spend more time on this renderer of course, currently rendering imported (implemented parts) is enough for me
      assetkit imports COLLADA document (it will support glTF too),
      importing scene, geometries, effects/materials, 2d textures and rendering them seems working
      My actual confusion is about shaders. COLLADA has COMMON profile and GLSL... profiles,
      GLSL profile provides shaders for effects so I don't need to wory about them just compile, link, group them before render

      The problem occours in COMMON profile because I need to write shaders,
      Actually I wrote them for basic matrials and another version for 2d texture
      I would like to create multiple program but I am not sure how to split this this shader into smaller ones,

      Basic material version (only colors):
      Texture version:
      I used subroutines to bind materials, actually I liked it,
      In scene graph every node can have different program, and it switches between them if parentNode->program != node->program
      (I'll do scene graph optimizations e.g.  view frustum culling, grouping shaders... later)

      I'm going to implement transparency but I'm considering to create separate shaders,
      because default shader is going to be branching hell
      I can't generate shader for every node because I don't know how many node can be exist, there is no limit.
      I don't know how to write a good uber-shader for different cases:

      Here material struct:
      struct Material { ColorOrTexture emission; ColorOrTexture ambient; ColorOrTexture specular; ColorOrTexture reflective; ColorOrTexture transparent; ColorOrTexture diffuse; float shininess; float reflectivEyety; float transparency; float indexOfRefraction; }; ColorOrTexture could be color or 2d texture, if there would be single colorOrTex then I could split into two programs,
      Also I'm going to implement transparency, I am not sure how many program that I needed

      I'm considering to maintain a few default shaders for COMMON profile,
      1-no-texture, 2-one of colorOrTexture contains texture, 3-........

      Any advices in general or about how to optimize/split (if I need) these shaders which I provied as link?
      What do you think the shaders I wrote, I would like to write them without branching if posible,
      I hope I don't need to write 50+ or 100+ shaders, and 100+ default programs

      PS: These default shaders should render any document, they are not specific, they are general purpose...
             I'm compiling and linking default shaders when app launched

    • By CircleOfLight97
      Hi guys,
      I would like to contribute to a game project as a developer (open source possibly). I have some experiences in C/C++ in game development (perso projects). I don't know either unreal or unity but I have some knowledges in opengl, glsl and shading theory as I had some courses at university regarding to that. I have some knowledges in maths and basic in physics. I know a little how to use blender to do modelling, texturing and simple game assets (no characters, no animation no skinning/rigging). I have no game preferences but I like aventure game, dungeon crawler, platformers, randomly generated things. I know these kind of projects involve a lot of time and I'd be really to work on it but if there are no cleary defined specific design goals/stories/gameplay mechanics I would like to not be part of it x) and I would rather prefer a smaller but well defined project to work on that a huge and not 'finishable' one.