• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Dodopod

Turn-Based Tactical Game Turn Structure

13 posts in this topic

I'm currently prototyping a turn-based tactical game. Most similar games that I've played or heard of (sadly, mostly the latter) structure turns in one of two ways:

Action Points
On each turn, units are alotted a quantity of generic points, which players can arbitrarily spend on movement, combat, etc. In some games, attacking always uses up a unit's remaining points.
Phases
Each player's turn – or sometimes a whole round – is divided up into separate phases in which players can only take one type of action. Usually there will be, at least, a movement and an attack phase, in that order.

What are some of the strengths and drawbacks of each of these schemes, are there any other ways you know of to structure turns, and which one would you recommend?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An observation on Action Points, which are an abstraction of Actions/Turn; it's the inverse of Turns/Action, where an action is accomplished over several turns.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If action points are usable for any action -- this isn't always the case, they are sometimes further broken down into "general", "movement", "attack", etc. categories -- then one advantage of the system is that you can still choose the type of actions you wish to take if your actions have been limited.  It's common in turn-based games to be able to suppress the actions of an opposing player -- "cannot act during movement phase", "loses 1 action point", etc. -- and unlike being suppressed by phase, a non-total loss of action-points may still allow a choice of action-types.

 

 

An advantage of phase-based play can sometimes be in the simple and obvious triggering of timed actions.  An ability might trigger at the beginning of movement phase, or at the completion of the attack phase.  With a point-based system, you're either more restricted to "at begin of turn" or "at end of turn", or have to go more complex with "at specific action type".

 

 

I like both types of game-play if implemented well in a fun game.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either is fine, but I feel that the phase approach is easier to understand and exploit. It's still fun, but I end up plotting complicated strategies on paper or in Excel rather than in-game. At the same time, an action point system might be harder to balance-- if you under- or overestimate how many points an action should cost, the action becomes overpowered or impractical, respectively.

 

Another possibility is Time Units (as in X-COM). It's very similar to action points, but allows a bit more flexibility for the player and is more intuitive than the less-precise action point approach.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote for new Firaxis X-Com's Time Units. It really streamlines the whole gameplay without sacrifacing any decisions (actually, this simplification allows more decisions). Instead of counting all the time how many APs you have left, you just decide what you want to achieve.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a sidenote, turns can be resources/advantages as well, in some games characters have speed or initiative that allows them to take their turn, so higher speed allows more turns. As an extention to this, to add in extra strong abilities i would have a character "prepare" one turn(possibly taking his next turn earlier) so he can use the stronger ability once.

On another side-note:most turn-based games use mana to perform most actions instead of action-points(1 action/turn, X mana the whole battle or more if you defend often or something)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote for new Firaxis X-Com's Time Units. It really streamlines the whole gameplay without sacrifacing any decisions (actually, this simplification allows more decisions). Instead of counting all the time how many APs you have left, you just decide what you want to achieve.

Pardon my gushing, but: They're amazing, right? In X:EU, you only get two actions per turn, but you still have essentially the full flexibility of the original UFO:EU (except, of course, you can't shoot before moving). Technically, it's just AP with the "attacking ends a unit's turn" restriction, but it's interesting because there are just enough AP to force you to carefully budget them while still having so few that you can instantly know whether you can or can't do something, without having to look it up. When combined with the movement radius your troops have, the effect is to move the focus from when things happen to where.

 

It's like how the original Command & Conquer was able to have a relatively deep strategy game with fast-paced, engaging action, without making the player internalize a dozen spreadsheets and a whole keyboard of macros, just by giving the player a clean sidebar and a single, contextual mouse button. Or how Deus Ex was able to turn a stealth-focused FPS into a deeply customisable, pseudo-RPG experience with several skills, measured on a scale of 1-4, a handful of binary augmentation choices, and a limited inventory.

 

On a sidenote, turns can be resources/advantages as well, in some games characters have speed or initiative that allows them to take their turn, so higher speed allows more turns. As an extention to this, to add in extra strong abilities i would have a character "prepare" one turn(possibly taking his next turn earlier) so he can use the stronger ability once.

You mean like Final Fantasy Tactics (and probably a myriad of games I'm not familiar with). That is an oversight on my part, but in my defence, I hadn't actually played that game until a few days after posting.

 

On another side-note:most turn-based games use mana to perform most actions instead of action-points(1 action/turn, X mana the whole battle or more if you defend often or something)

I'm not sure I've heard of this one, before... What's an example? Also, what happens if both sides run out of mana without destroying the other? Does it double as morale, and the side/unit that runs out retreats/surrenders? Or perhaps they fall, lifeless, like robots without any battery power?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I'm not sure I've heard of this one, before... What's an example? Also, what happens if both sides run out of mana without destroying the other? Does it double as morale, and the side/unit that runs out retreats/surrenders? Or perhaps they fall, lifeless, like robots without any battery power?

 

I'm quite sure almost any game(including FF:T) that uses magic uses this, except, they usually don't set it up that you have to be extra-carefull with your mana.

When running out of mana, mana-abilities(spells) become unavailable and characters have to use less effective attacks/actions.(hitting the opponent with your wand while not wearing any armor)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm quite sure almost any game(including FF:T) that uses magic uses this, except, they usually don't set it up that you have to be extra-carefull with your mana.
When running out of mana, mana-abilities(spells) become unavailable and characters have to use less effective attacks/actions.(hitting the opponent with your wand while not wearing any armor)

 

Okay, that makes sense. For some reason, I was thinking that you were saying that, in most games, mana was necessary for any action, including movement and things like that.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few games out there that use fuel(and usually ammunition as well) as a resource, and include some kind of supply-unit(s).

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The phase approach is more simple and more easily comprehended, although i feel that if you wish to.approach this on a tactical level specifically then it may not be idea. The action point method allows for more freedom and development on the field. But why not create your own hybrid. Innovation has never hurt anyone.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think an action point system works well.  Especially if you allow enough action points to accomplish more than one phase.  

 

For example I will use an artillery unit.  

 

Artillery: 10 ap

 

Move: 5 ap

Set up: 5 ap

Attack:5 ap

Pack up: 5 ap

 

That way you have more combinations than just being able to perform one action per turn.   

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0