• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
multifractal

Improving Pixel Shader Ridged Multifractal Function

3 posts in this topic

Hello,

I recently decided to switch from creating heightmaps in openCL to a pixel shader. While this makes things easier to work with I have one major issue. For terrain I am relying primarily on this ridged multifractal function:

float RMF(in vec3 v)  {

		 float result, frequency, signal, weight;
		 float H = 1.0;
		 float lacunarity = 2.143212;
		 int octaves = 12;
		 float offset = 1.0;
		 float gain = 2.1;
         int i;
         bool first = true;
		float exponentArray[12];
             frequency =.6;
             if(first){     	 
             for (i=0; i<octaves; i++) {
                   exponentArray[i] =  pow(frequency, -H); 
                   frequency *= lacunarity;
                     
             }
             first = false;
             }

       
         signal = inoise(v);
         
         if (signal < 0.0) signal = -signal;
             

         signal = offset - signal;
         
         signal *=signal;
        
         result = signal;
         weight = 1.0;

         for (i = 1; i < octaves; i++) {
    
             v*=lacunarity;

          
             weight = signal * gain;

             if ( weight > 1.0 ) weight = 1.0;
                 
             if ( weight < 0.0 ) weight = 0.0;
                 

            signal = (inoise(v));

             if ( signal < 0.0 ) signal = -signal;
                 

             signal = offset - signal;
             signal *= signal;
       
             signal *= weight;
             result += signal * exponentArray[i];
         }
         return (result - 1.0) / 2.0;        
     }

Using openCl I could produce heightmap such as the following:

img.png

 

This resulted in "strong" terrain features and rough mountains yet smooth valleys. 

Using a pixel shader I cannot reproduce such quality. 

At best I can create something like below: 

image.png

 

Which is far too rough and lacks the height features of the other implementation. 

I can think of no other cause of these disparities than the actual perlin noise function being used. 

For the pixel shader I am using the noise described here: http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems2/gpugems2_chapter26.html

while in openCL I was using the following function:

float sgnoise2d(float2 position)
{
	float2 p = position;
	float2 pf = floor(p);
	int2 ip = (int2)((int)pf.x, (int)pf.y);
	float2 fp = p - pf;        
    ip &= P_MASK;
	
	const int2 I00 = (int2)(0, 0);
	const int2 I01 = (int2)(0, 1);
	const int2 I10 = (int2)(1, 0);
	const int2 I11 = (int2)(1, 1);
	
	const float2 F00 = (float2)(0.0f, 0.0f);
	const float2 F01 = (float2)(0.0f, 1.0f);
	const float2 F10 = (float2)(1.0f, 0.0f);
	const float2 F11 = (float2)(1.0f, 1.0f);

	float n00 = gradient2d(ip + I00, fp - F00);
	float n10 = gradient2d(ip + I10, fp - F10);
	float n01 = gradient2d(ip + I01, fp - F01);
	float n11 = gradient2d(ip + I11, fp - F11);

	const float2 n0001 = (float2)(n00, n01);
	const float2 n1011 = (float2)(n10, n11);

	float2 n2 = mix2d(n0001, n1011, smooth(fp.x));
	float n = mix1d(n2.x, n2.y, smooth(fp.y));
	return n * (1.0f / 0.7f);
}

float ugnoise2d(float2 position)
{
    return (0.5f - 0.5f * sgnoise2d(position));
}

I would like to keep using the improved glsl noise that I am using but I was wondering if anyone had any experience with good ridged multifractal functions to use in a pixel shader. Thanks for any help whatsoever. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you used that implementation I'm pretty sure you're fine. Looking at those pictures I guess you have no more than a different scaling issue. Looking at the Level stats in Paint.NET it's quote obvious actually: The second one doesn't go over 0.5. Try scaling it by 2.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you used that implementation I'm pretty sure you're fine. Looking at those pictures I guess you have no more than a different scaling issue. Looking at the Level stats in Paint.NET it's quote obvious actually: The second one doesn't go over 0.5. Try scaling it by 2.

Yea that was stupid of me:

 

image.png

 

Although that still doesn't look great, I could probably just fiddle with the variables more.

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea that was stupid of me

 
No, I could have been wrong as well wink.png
 
Unless you have some automatic normalization you can get pretty far off results, especially when using low res color formats (your latest screenshot still does not use the full range). So yeah, play around and get familiar with it. GPU-noise is nice in this regard since you can get results interactively.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0