• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
KaptenDavidsson

What framework should I use for this PC game?

6 posts in this topic

I started making a

  • 3:rd person
  • Large map
  • Network, 4-8 players in each game
  • Many different classes
  • Strange physics
  • Many different weapons

game in XNA. But I found myself spending a lot of time just trying to make basic things work. Such as jumping (not falling through the floor too much) and running smoothly uphill (did it with linear interpolation). I was wondering if I perhaps should use something instead of XNA?

 

  • How about Unreal engine for example? Is it flexible enough? I want to make something original.
  • Perhaps Unity?
  • Perhaps a good XNA game engine?

 

All suggestions appreciated. I'm new to this smile.png

Thanx

Edited by KaptenDavidsson
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Switching the Engine/Framework won't change much for you.

As you said, you spend a lot of time trying to make basic things work. The given examples will be the same in URE or Unity or elsewhere.

If you are new to game developing, you should be prepared in your mind, that you have to work these things out. Once you know how they work it will be easier.

Also, as much as i know, the URE is only available for C++. So to use it, you would have to learn a new language and a new Framework.

But don't forget the positive aspect: It's always way more satisfying to see how your own solution works, instead of seeing how a re-implemented solution of someone else works.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Switching the Engine/Framework won't change much for you.

As you said, you spend a lot of time trying to make basic things work. The given examples will be the same in URE or Unity or elsewhere.

If you are new to game developing, you should be prepared in your mind, that you have to work these things out. Once you know how they work it will be easier.

Also, as much as i know, the URE is only available for C++. So to use it, you would have to learn a new language and a new Framework.

But don't forget the positive aspect: It's always way more satisfying to see how your own solution works, instead of seeing how a re-implemented solution of someone else works.

 

Thanks, I guess I stick to XNA then :)

 

I find it interesting that, for example, a person running around smoothly and jumping in a 3d world with some topography is not included as a template in XNA and Unity since there are probably hundreds of thousands of people that would use this as a starting point for their games. 

 

C++ is not that big of a problem since I use it at work every now and then (business application, not games) but I still prefer C#. 

 

Yes I agree, I don't want it to be a re-implementation, but mostly because I think it would stifle my imagination. But still, some help on the most common features of a game would be nice (XNA actually provide some of this, for example double buffering but I could use a little more, it's a fine line). 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would go cross platform and try Torque 3D or such, but I'm a Ubuntu user...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The reason why

a person running around smoothly and jumping in a 3d world

isn't implemented per default in XNA is because XNA is a framework, not an engine. It only provides the base to you.
Apart from that there are many different ways to implement an environment and the way of implementing the feature depends on the way your terrain works.

I think in Unity it is implemented in the first-person-camera-asset, isn't it?

P.S.: You don't have to quote my full post, especially not when it is just above your answer. Edited by LVreg
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Switching the Engine/Framework won't change much for you.

As you said, you spend a lot of time trying to make basic things work. The given examples will be the same in URE or Unity or elsewhere.

 

Have you ever used an engine or written a game that has such a feature set from scratch ?

 

Engines like Unreal Engine, CryEngine and I think Unity too, will take care of a lot if not all of the mentioned things.

Using such an engine will leave you to almost only asset creation, value tweaking(in case of physics) and very little programming in comparison to write everything from scratch.

Unreal Engine has a very good documentation with lots of examples, for example how to create a 3rd person camera.

Unity has its asset store where you can buy scripts, meshes and anything else, so you could also cut asset creation time.

 

If your primary target is to create a game and not to learn the technology I highly recommend to evaluate the available engines and go with one of them! 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would go cross platform and try Torque 3D or such, but I'm a Ubuntu user...

 

Well, according to Gabe Linux is the new big platform for games. I might check out Torque, thanks.

 

 

Apart from that there are many different ways to implement an environment and the way of implementing the feature depends on the way your terrain works.

 

 

Ok, I think see what you are saying: It's hard to make a one-size-fits-all.

 

If your primary target is to create a game and not to learn the technology I highly recommend to evaluate the available engines and go with one of them! 

 

 

Interesting. My primary target at the moment is indeed to create a game. Which engine would you recommend? I would like to have something more on the programming end and less on the value tweaking end since I want to be able to make some unique features. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0