• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
floatingwoods

GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8_EXT not working ok on NVidia and Intel. ATI doing fine

10 posts in this topic

Hi,

 

I am having compatibility issues between graphic cards, when using FBO and stencil buffers: it only works correctly on ATI cards, NVidia (GeForce GT 620) and Intel (HD Graphics 4000) fail (they operate as if the stencil buffers were not enabled). I made sure I had the last drivers. Any idea what I am doing wrong, or what is going on?

Here my code:

glGenFramebuffersEXT(1,&_fbo);
glBindFramebufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,_fbo);
        
glGenRenderbuffersEXT(1,&_fboDepthBuffer);
glBindRenderbufferEXT(GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboDepthBuffer);
glRenderbufferStorageEXT(GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8_EXT,resX,resY);
glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT_EXT,GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboDepthBuffer);

glGenRenderbuffersEXT(1,&_fboPictureBuffer);
glBindRenderbufferEXT(GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboPictureBuffer);
glRenderbufferStorageEXT(GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,GL_RGB,resX,resY);
glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0_EXT,GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboPictureBuffer);

glBindFramebufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,_fbo);

The FBO functionality works fine with all tested graphic cards. Only the stencil buffer functionality fails with above mentionned graphic cards.

 

Thanks for any insight.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you mhagain,

 

The code is quite old... I now switched to ARB_framebuffer_object. I basically left everything untouched, except that I check for the availability of ARB_framebuffer_object, then bind the functions to the same names, except for the final EXT.

I have also checked that my card has EXT_packed_depth_stencil. It has it, but my problem remains on the NVidia card and Intel card. What could be the reason?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why it would happen if the extension is exported; I've never actually used EXT_framebuffer_object (either ARB was always available by the time I got interested in FBOs in OpenGL, or else I needed to support hardware that didnt have either so I used CopyTexSubImage2D).

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to both of you.

 

I found the problem. Changing this line:

glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT_EXT,GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboDepthBuffer);

into this:

glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_EXT,GL_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT,GL_RENDERBUFFER_EXT,_fboDepthBuffer);

Makes the trick. The question is now why it worked on ATI cards with the wrong argument?!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes the trick. The question is now why it worked on ATI cards with the wrong argument?!

 

With API/AMD my first instinct would be to say "bad driver".  It's normally the other way around (things that should work don't) but still a viable possibility.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's why I asked which hardware he was testing on; with anything GCN based it working is logical... in an odd way.

GCN hardware doesn't used packed depth-stencil targets; memory is allocated in two blocks of depth and stencil, so from the drivers point of view if you allocate a D24_S8 texture it is, in fact, allocating a D32 & S8 textures behind the scenes (so you get no memory saving at all D24 vs D32), so when you bind this to a depth attachment target this is 'ok' as the driver knows how attach things correctly. Chances are the 'completeness' rules are woolly enough here that AMD's logic is allowed and perfectly fine.

Although this does bring the follow up question of 'does the OP see the expected result with regards to stencil values?' as they probably shouldn't see any coming out for this to make sense smile.png
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

The ATI card where the original (i.e. wrong) code was working was an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470. The behaviour was correct (i.e. the stencil buffers did what they were used for (implementation of mirrors in a scene))

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0