Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
farmdve

I am trying to fix how weapons look.

2 posts in this topic

For a while now, when playing first person shooters, one thing has always bugged me, the weapon that blocks the view, and the metal ring or square around the crosshair.
 
Here is a random image I found on google showing an ACOG scope http://images.wikia.com/callofduty/images/9/99/Aiming_down_the_ACOG_Scope_CODG.png, what do you notice? I for instance am bugged by it, simply because the metal ring blocks a few percent of the view. Another image here showing the main body of the PP-2000 from BF3 and how it blocks a lot from the view http://www.imfdb.org/images/thumb/e/ec/Bf3_pp-2000_aim.jpg/600px-Bf3_pp-2000_aim.jpg
 
Now what else do you see? Yes, the body of the weapon with the hand holding it, that blocks a significant amount of view in front of you, so much that it will hide an enemy if he is slightly farther away and below you. Has happened to me.
 
This is pretty much an issue with every shooter out there that has an aim down feature of the weapon(s). How do you propose this gets fixed, but maintains a feel of realism?
Edited by farmdve
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Personally I like pains-taking realism.  The most realistic to me is the FPS that allows quick change from first person naked eye view to the scope or gun site view (which is at the correct position and scale that you would see when actually firing a gun).  For me it feels good to play with realism even at the sacrifice of a slight amount of combat awareness for a moment - just as in real combat.  Of course, in actual fighting a squad of troops would be depending upon one another for combined visual awareness of the situation, group communication filling the role of mitigating the effects of blind spots in an individual soldier's view.

 

Most people are the opposite of guys like me.  They want to sacrifice some realism for convenience and there is nothing wrong with that.  I feel that the best FPS games allow the gamer to choose either realistic views or arcade views.  Obviously this increases the work for the game developer but is really appreciated.

 

 

Clinton

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see a problem. When you look down the iron sight or scope you are totally focusing to the crosshair whether you are zooming (FOV changes) or not. That is how it is in real life and that's how it should be in games. If using scope/iron sights was easy and didn't have a downside, people would always use them. That doesn't happen IRL and it doesn't happen in games either, and that is successful game design in my opinion.

 

I don't think this is even matter of realism or not. Aiming accurately simply needs a tradeoff and leaving it out would not "fix" anything. It's the same as you need ammo to fire weapons, you need mana to use spells, you need something to step on in a platformer game etc.

 

So if you have a scope, put a zoom with field of view change on it so you see the smaller area larger because field of view changes. You can even make the scope fullscreen like here so that nothing besides screen overlay (scope shape) and FOV limits the view. If you use iron sights, make the weapon more accurate and put a small zoom / DoF effect there mainly to indicate this to the player.

 

BTW If you think the image you found is bad check these examples from Day of Defeat Source:

http://i.imgur.com/HR2P8.jpg vs http://i.imgur.com/S4NcD.jpg

 

But the only thing that is off about the above examples is that they are supposed to be corresponding weapons for opposing teams. Did the developers take into consideration that the first has much worse aiming in iron sight mode as they balanced the weapon damages? (the first one basically does double the damage but is also slower, smaller clip, etc) I believe they did.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0