• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Lighting - Lightmaps and bumpmaps

This topic is 1548 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am currently working on a game engine and I have a problem.

 

I want to introduce lighting to my engine. I know the opengl has only 8 lights so I need to implement my own lighting system. I've tried somee simple fragment shaders to do that but the performance is poor when i use many lights. So I think that I need to use lightmaps on the static geometry.

 

My question is how can I implement bumpmapping using lightmaps(or any other way to do lighting)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

hello, you can consider implementing deferred rendering for complex geometry with many lights. give it a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, I will try to do some research on it as soon as possible, but, could you explain me more about how that works?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to point out when you say "8 lights" it means that for each rendering call you can have up to 8 lights defined. You should be able to find out which lights affect which objects (typically only few) and set the lights for each draw call. 

 

Of course, all that fixed function stuff is implemented with shaders nowadays, and making your own lighting system isn't a bad idea. 

 

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lightmaps are very suitable for static geometry lighting... and advanced directional lightmapping can even be used for semi-dynamic model lighting (light changes on model depending or their position in the map)

 

Basically you first have to know how to bake a lightmap.. I use the method described here: http://forum.unity3d.com/threads/8998-Making-lightmaps-in-Maya-(tutorial)

 

Then implementing it on the code side.. you basically have to have a "duplicate" model of your map, with identical geometry.. You use that to create the lightmap so it gets new uv's... You import the UV's from the lightmap, pass them to the fragment shader, use them to do a texture lookup with the lightmap texture using the same UV coords, and lightply in the result

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

kauna has the best reply.

Doing baked lighting or writing a deferred renderer is an extremely long way to go out of one’s way just because of a simple misunderstanding about how many lights are supported in OpenGL.

 

To be clear: The limit on the number of lights in OpenGL’s fixed-function pipeline is limited only by the amount of memory on your machine.

The limit is 8 at a time.

There is nothing stopping you from rendering using 8 lights, then again with 8 more, and again, etc., until all 20,000 lights in your scene have been processed (never try this at home kids).

Lighting is additive, so each pass simply adds on top of the previous.

 

 

Also mentioned was that you really should be using shaders anyway.  Deferred renderers requires shaders in the first place, and it is still much easier to switch to shaders than to bake and use lightmaps.

 

 

L. Spiro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies! Although I am going to use the old opengl(probably 2.1) I dont want to use the fixed-function functionality, and I have sucessfully implemented lighting by shaders. The thing is that I want to do per fragment lighting, wich I found to be slow when using multiple lights.

 

I've done some research about deferred rendering and it seams to be my best option. I've sucessfuly made the G-Buffer but i'm having trouble doing the light pass. I'm not sure if I should create another topic about that or not, but i will post part of my code and stuff.

 

normals

BFJCBl0.png

 

position

pVKulul.png

 

diffuse

 

Bslwqml.png

 

I think those are okay. Here is my shader that generates those:

varying vec4 color;
varying vec2 texCoords;

varying vec3 N;

varying vec3 pos;

void main() {
    color = gl_Color.rgba;
    gl_Position = ftransform();
    texCoords = gl_MultiTexCoord0.xy;

    N = normalize(gl_NormalMatrix * gl_Normal);
	
	pos = vec4(ftransform()).xyz;
}

varying vec4 color;
varying vec2 texCoords;
uniform sampler2D textureSampler;

varying vec3 N;
varying vec3 v;

varying vec3 pos;

void main()
{
	gl_FragData[0] = color * texture2D(textureSampler, texCoords);
	gl_FragData[1] = vec4(N, 1.0);
	gl_FragData[2] = vec4(pos, 1.0);
	gl_FragData[3] = vec4(texCoords, 0.0, 1.0);
}

and here is my lighting shader

varying vec2 texCoords;

void main() {
    gl_Position = ftransform();
    texCoords = gl_MultiTexCoord0.xy;
}
varying vec2 texCoords;
uniform sampler2D DSampler;//Diffuse
uniform sampler2D NSampler;//Normals
uniform sampler2D PSampler;//Positions
void main(){
	vec3 lpos = vec3(0, 0, 52);
	
	vec3 v = texture2D(PSampler, texCoords).rgb;
	vec3 N = texture2D(NSampler, texCoords).rgb;
	
	vec3 L = normalize(lpos - v);   
	vec4 Idiff = gl_FrontLightProduct[0].diffuse * max(dot(N,L), 0.0);  
	Idiff = clamp(Idiff, 0.0, 1.0);
	
	gl_FragColor = Idiff * texture2D(DSampler, texCoords);
}

What is wrong with those. Everything is black.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First you do max(dot(N,L), 0.0);, which always produces a negative number or 0, and then you do clamp(Idiff, 0.0, 1.0);, which clamps between 0 and 1.

The only value that can get through that unharmed is 0, and all other values will become 0.


L. Spiro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be honest I don't know how to fix that, i tried putting a minus before max(dot(N,L), 0.0), but that didnt work, so I removed clamp, but that didn't affect anything idk why.

Also, it actualy is working, I probably set the light in a bad position or something. My problem now is that it is upside down and the light is a bit strange. Here are some pictures of it in comparison with forward rendering:

 

Forward rendering

KJg5Im1.png

 

Deferred rendering

 

DVLdeIq.png

 

Idk what is wrong with it. Can somebody help me?

Thanks again. smile.png

 

PS:

Also, could someone tell me if you deferred rendering or forward rendering in your game/engine?

Edited by Miguel71

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use forward rendering with some nice tricks for simple&fast dynamic lighting. I find filling the gbuffer of deferred is just too large an overhead... So it's really only worth it if you have "A LOT" of *active* (on screen and visible) dynamic lights.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM5jVwk_oP8

 

This is all done on a crappy card at ~200 FPS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
  • Advertisement