Sign in to follow this  
Seabolt

OpenGL FBO rendering behavior

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I have some questions about how an FBO may work.

I'm trying to incorporate FBOs into an existing rendering pipeline. To maintain current architecture I'm trying to use only one FBO for the program. I know it may not be ideal, but it should still work, (unless someone knows a better way to do MRT in OpenGL). I really can't know about any other targets I may be bound with when I create the render target, so I'm creating them and attaching them to the FBO later on.

So my current path is like such:

If it's a color target: Create a texture.

If it's a depth target: Create a renderbuffer.

Then when I bind the targets for a draw:
Bind a framebuffer
For each color target
     If it's a color target.
         Attach my texture to the frame buffer
    If it's a depth target
        Attach my renderbuffer to the frame buffer
Enable the draw buffer for any color target attachments

This runs with no problems, but in gDebugger I don't see anything being drawn to my color target's texture. Any ideas?

 

//
// Create our gl texture handle
//

glGenTextures( 1, &texture->m_Texture );																	
GL_ERROR( "Failed to generate render target texture" );
glBindTexture( GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture->m_Texture );															
GL_ERROR( "Failed to bind the render target texture when initializing" );

//
// Set the texture data parameters and some filtering data.
// TODO: We need to pass in platform agnostic filtering information here.
//
	
GLenum platformFormat = GetPlatformTextureFormat( format ); 
GLenum imageFormat = GetOpenGLImageFormat( platformFormat );
GLenum componentType = GetOpenGLComponentType( platformFormat );
glTexImage2D( GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, platformFormat, width, height, 0, imageFormat, componentType, 0 );			
GL_ERROR( "Failed to set the texture image parameters for a render target texture" );

glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);										
GL_ERROR( "Failed to set the filtering parameters for a render target texture" );
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);											
GL_ERROR( "Failed to set the filtering parameters for a render target texture" );

and for depth stencil render targets I use this code:

 

pglGenRenderbuffers( 1, &m_PlatformData.m_TargetHandle );				
GL_ERROR( "Failed to generate render buffer handle" );

pglBindRenderbuffer( GL_RENDERBUFFER, m_PlatformData.m_TargetHandle );		
GL_ERROR( "Failed to bind the render buffer" );

pglRenderbufferStorage( GL_RENDERBUFFER, platformFormat, width, height );	
GL_ERROR( "Failed to set render buffer storage" );
		
pglBindRenderbuffer( GL_RENDERBUFFER, 0 );		
pglBindFramebuffer( GL_FRAMEBUFFER, m_FrameBufferObject ); 
GL_ERROR( "Failed to bind context frame buffer" );

int numDrawBuffers = 0;
GLenum drawBuffers[ VTG_MAX_RENDER_TARGETS ] = {GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0};
for( int currentTarget = 0; currentTarget < VTG_MAX_RENDER_TARGETS; ++currentTarget )
{
	if( m_BoundRenderTargets[ currentTarget ] )
	{
	        m_BoundRenderTargets[ currentTarget ]->Bind( currentTarget );
		drawBuffers[ currentTarget ] = GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + currentTarget;
		numDrawBuffers++;
	}
}

pglDrawBuffers( numDrawBuffers, drawBuffers );	
GL_ERROR( "Failed to specify draw buffers" );

if( m_BoundDepthTarget )
{
	m_BoundDepthTarget->Bind( -1 );
}

//
// Now we need to make sure we are complete.
//

CheckForCompleteness();

The bind function for a render target looks like this: 

 

	if( m_Texture )
	{
		//glBindTexture( GL_TEXTURE_2D, m_Texture->m_Texture );	
                GL_ERROR( "Failed to bind the texture" );
		pglFramebufferTexture2D( GL_FRAMEBUFFER, attachment, GL_TEXTURE_2D, m_Texture->m_Texture, 0 );
		GL_ERROR( "Failed to set the render target as a texture" );
	}
	else
	{
		//
		// Attach to the currently bound frame buffer object.
		// TODO: Need some way to ensure there is an FBO bound...
		//

		pglFramebufferRenderbuffer( GL_FRAMEBUFFER,
			attachment,
			GL_RENDERBUFFER,
			m_PlatformData.m_TargetHandle );
		GL_ERROR( "Failed to attach the render buffer to the frame buffer" );
	}
			
GL_ERROR( "Failed to bind the default back buffer" );

This code executes with no problem. Then when I update all render targets I do this code:

 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, i'd check whether your framebuffer is proper ...

printf("%i\n",glCheckFramebufferStatus(GL_FRAMEBUFFER)==GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE);

Also, I'd avoid using a renderbuffer for the depth.. just use a regular GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT texture....

 

Lastly, probably can try to avoid re-attaching the textures to the framebuffer each time. Just attach them once when you create it and they're still attached next time you bind the framebuffer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am check the framebuffer completeness, it's all good. 
I'm using a renderbuffer for the depth because it's faster and I want to test renderbuffer functionality as well.

My problem is that I don't know what render targets are going to be bound to a framebuffer each frame, so I have to rebind the texture/renderbuffers each frame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it seems that it will write to the render target texture as long as the texture is bound. If I bind another texture it seems to overwrite it. Should that happen? What if I want to bind a texture for something I want to draw into the render target, how would I do that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus christ, I apologize guys, I'm all over the place right now.

I can get the model to draw if I don't use a depth stencil buffer.

Is it possible the texture and renderbuffer are conflicting somehow? The renderbuffer is being bound to the GL_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT point of the FBO so it shouldn't be overwriting anything...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627741
    • Total Posts
      2978887
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now