• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ChaosEngine

Is gaming on console dying?

57 posts in this topic

Ok, apologies for the overly hyperbolic title, but there's precedent :)

 

So for the last two nights, I decided that the best way to play Arkham Origins would be on my couch in front of my TV.

So I set Win7 to autologon and Steam to start in Big Picture mode. After plugging a grand total of 4 cables (power, network, hdmi and xbox controller), I sat down and was soon striking terror in fluid 1080p on a big screen.

 

Over the last few days it's been revealed that even the so-called "next gen" consoles will be upscaling 720p content for some of their big titles. The consoles aren't even out yet and they're already underpowered.

 

I get the idea behind a console. Consoles served a dual purpose of simplification (no visible OS, filesystem, drivers, etc) and also they provided economies of scale (the manufacturers had enough buying power to deliver a machine that would probably cost you a lot more to build as a PC).

 

It seems that neither of these things are true anymore. I've demonstrated that setting up a PC as a living room box is trivially easy (and with the advent of steam machines, it's only going to get easier), and cost wise? Well, rock paper shotgun ran an article that showed how to build a PC that was more powerful than either console for pretty much the same money. And that was nearly 5 months ago now. As time passes, a similar or even better spec'd PC will just get cheaper.

 

So my question is, why would anyone buy an xbox one / ps4?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think it is dying because you can build a more powerful machine.  That argument has been brought up ever since the first few rounds of home game consoles.

 

Why buy an Atari 2600 when you can get more powerful home computers? Why buy an N64 when you could buy a Pentium Pro that had so much more power?

 

Why would anybody today buy a PC with an i3 or i5 processor when they could by the i7 or the server-level E7 processor?

 

Why would anyone buy a PC with 4GB of RAM when they could buy a machine filled with 256GB of memory?

 

Why would anyone buy a PC that didn't have a bleeding edge graphics card?

 

 

 

The answer is simple:  You buy the equipment not because it is top of the line, you buy it because it meets the requirements.

 

A game console's requirements are to play specific games. That is all.

 

If you want to play the game and you are wealthy enough to afford it, you get the console for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get the idea behind a console. Consoles served a dual purpose of simplification (no visible OS, filesystem, drivers, etc) and also they provided economies of scale (the manufacturers had enough buying power to deliver a machine that would probably cost you a lot more to build as a PC).

 

They also have well-defined hardware and software specs that developers can develop against, allowing the same hardware to be used more effectively.

For example, until all your PC customers have 8GB of RAM, you can't assume they have it. With consoles, you can. Same with the number of cores. Or the amount of videocard RAM, or the size of the CPU caches, the read/write time of the harddrives/disc-drives. These hardware guarantees allow for greater optimizations - new games released at the beginning of a console cycle look inferior to those released at the end of the console cycle... but the console hardware hasn't improved, just the developers' abilities to optimize.

 

You also mentioned that PC hardware will get cheaper - and so will the console hardware. The console hardware will get cheaper and have the economy of scale working for it. For each console, games will get better, while the console gets cheaper, with each year.

 

This doesn't make consoles better than PCs (I'm a PC gamer), but it's another thing to add into the mix.

 

Also, in the USA, getting pirated console game discs is unusual. Not uncommon, but not mainstream. With PCs in the USA, pirated computer games (and smartphone games) are common-place. With the US being one of the largest markets for videogames, that might also influence where developers decide to invest money.

Edited by Servant of the Lord
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question. I'm going to get a PS4. And here's why:

  • Exclusives. Some of the best PS3 games I played were exclusives. Sony has great franchises you can't find on PC.
  • It's a gaming machine, designed specifically for games. I don't think PCs provide the same gaming experience when you place them in the leaving room.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus, games are supposed to be games, not benchmarks. Most games need to be fun, and not meet the maximum specs of the hardware they are running on..

 

I might be naive in saying this, but I don't think the console market is dying at all, its seems to keep going steady. New hardware and software always coming out, lots of sales, as in the case of GTA V, which actually broke records..

 

I believe playing either on a PC or on a console will always be a matter of personal preference, and neither will ever die. At least until some technological breakthrough for gaming comes out!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think it is dying because you can build a more powerful machine.  That argument has been brought up ever since the first few rounds of home game consoles.

 
Nope. You completely missed my point. 
 
Of course, you can build a more powerful machine. You always could, you just throw more money at it.

 

For the first few console iterations (NES, Genesis, N64, etc) consoles and pc games were entirely separate. Hell even between consoles most games were platform exclusives.

 

Over the last few iterations (xbox/ps2, 360/ps3) and now the new iteration things have started to converge.

 

But even then, building an equivalent machine at launch was probably at least 120-150% of the cost of the console.
 
My point is that for pretty much the first time in history, you can build an equivalent or better machine, for the same money, at launch, and the software ecosystem is such that you can now play 90+% of the same games, except they will look better.

 

The next gen can't even run current titles at 1080p, and yes, people do care about this. Especially in the next few years as 4k TV sets start to become affordable.

 

 

They also have well-defined hardware and software specs that developers can develop against, allowing the same hardware to be used more effectively.
For example, until all your PC customers have 8GB of RAM, you can't assume they have it.

 
Good point about the well defined spec.

But I disagree with the second part. You can just specify that 8GB of ram is required to run the game. Increasingly, games are starting to do this. Most "next-gen" titles are requiring 64bit OSs and the new supernatural fishy dog simulator (aka CoD: Ghosts) requires 6gb.

 

Obviously I'm not talking short term. The xbone/ps4 will make their respective companies lots of money.

 

But from a business perspective, it's got to the point where it's almost impossible to make a AAA game for just one system. Sony manage to do it, but I'd be willing to bet a large amount of money that Sony bankroll the likes of Naughty Dog as a loss leader. 

 

I think the line between what we consider PC gaming and console gaming will blur. I just don't see the current console business model of building a machine as a loss leader to get sales royalties to be viable anymore, and I don't think MS/Sony do anymore either, as evidenced by the fairly uninspiring machines they put out this generation.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But I disagree with the second part. You can just specify that 8GB of ram is required to run the game. Increasingly, games are starting to do this. Most "next-gen" titles are requiring 64bit OSs and the new supernatural fishy dog simulator (aka CoD: Ghosts) requires 6gb.

 

Try as you might, your support team will still field a bunch of calls from consumers who didn't read the tiny print on the back of the box, or who don't know what RAM is ('Is that a new CoD gun?'). And you still can't really expect any but your most tech-savy customers to understand you if you say you need a CPU with SSE4 and a L1 cache of 32KB, and a videocard with 2 GB of GDDR5. Ask them what their harddrive speeds are, and they'll give you the MPH of their Honda.

 

As a programmer, I'm above-average when it comes to tech-savviness of the general population, and if you asked me my own L2 cache size, I'd have to go check - I don't have it memorized. Knowing what games run on your computer shouldn't require you to be a hardware enthusiast. What Microsoft was doing with their Windows Experience Index was a good idea, though it never really gained traction and wasn't that accurate (apparently, they removed it from Windows 8.1).

 

j4ay.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is that for pretty much the first time in history, you can build an equivalent or better machine, for the same money, at launch, and the software ecosystem is such that you can now play 90+% of the same games, except they will look better.


The game experience is still different. Yes there are some games that come out on PC and console at the same, and some people will prefer one over the other.

But really, as I mentioned, people do not buy game consoles because of the system specs. I don't think "I want a game console that has such-and-such processor and such-and-such memory".

This is why people buy consoles:

A game console's requirements are to play specific games. That is all.
If you want to play the game and you are wealthy enough to afford it, you get the console for it.

People do not buy a game console just to have a game console. They buy it for a purpose.

Yes there are a very small number of people -- that DO NOT represent the majority of game players -- who will buy a specific console on opening day without any research or study of the games. They will just buy whatever they can find on the shelf.

The vast majority of consumers wait to buy until they find games they want to play on the system. Then they will buy the games and the console. The game console is a means to an end, not an end in itself.

The question is not if gaming on console is dying, the question should be if the games coming out are compelling enough. I see no evidence to suggest the games are not compelling.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I see another one of these threads I'm going to think of a way to ask if fun is dying, just to see what I get.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That article is comparing £600 PCs with £350-420 consoles (when you don't cheat and you include the HDD, labour and warranty).
Also they forget that you need some extra RAM to mirror the GPU memory, they dismiss RAM speed because that's not a bottleneck for modern CPUs (lolwut), and they don't back up their assertion that an i5 is twice as good as the console CPU at all...

That's not an historic moment in PC vs console gaming to me :P
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big win of consoles for me has always been the couch cooperative opportunity. I'm a little sad that the recent generation of titles has seen more and more exclusively online play, so I'm vaguely hopeful for the Ouya or something similar to push back and provide a healthier niche for having two or more people in the same room playing the same game without also needing two TVs, two consoles, two copies...

 

Look at me dreaming.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big win of consoles for me has always been the couch cooperative opportunity. I'm a little sad that the recent generation of titles has seen more and more exclusively online play, so I'm vaguely hopeful for the Ouya or something similar to push back and provide a healthier niche for having two or more people in the same room playing the same game without also needing two TVs, two consoles, two copies...

 

Look at me dreaming.

This!

 

Online multiplayer is great, but the fun to be had on split screen or coop with you friends in a basement is a whole other story. You don't get that with on a computer. You technically could, but no game is made like that since they expect you to be ON your computer, not hooking it up like a console lol.

 

But in defense of the OP (not for his initial reasoning), this aspect of consoles is definitely dying. sad.png And I think it is a huge factor in console > pc, besides the game library itself.

I can't tell you how many times my friends and I would pick up some awesome looking used games in the past few years, only to come home and find out it only has online multiplayer, or only 2 player split screen (really???), or a very limited version of multiplayer if you're doing local..angry.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No gaming platform is dying.

Well, except maybe BlackBerry OS as a gaming platform...

 

Next year will be the year of BlackBerry OS gaming.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@tychon and @FuzzyRhombus, who says you can't do that kind of gaming on a pc? 

 

I'm not arguing against a living room machine played with controllers, I'm simply saying that it's no longer really necessary to limit yourself to an xbox or a ps4 to do so.

 

I kinda regret the post title now, which I made as a throwaway joke reference to the "is pc gaming dying" thread.

 

My point is that two are starting to converge more and more and the console business model as now know it (big corporates creating fixed hardware platform at a loss) is increasingly untenable in a environment where spiralling AAA development cost force cross platform development.

 

That coupled with the failure of the new generation to play the current big titles (Ghosts, BF4, etc) at HD resolutions... well, I just don't think it's viable long term.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


That coupled with the failure of the new generation to play the current big titles (Ghosts, BF4, etc) at HD resolutions... well, I just don't think it's viable long term.

 

The Steam hardware & Software Survey looks to be showing about 35% of players using 1080p or higher resolutions. So while the technical capability is there, it looks like a pretty decent sized majority of PC gamers are also failing to experience the games at HD resolutions.

 

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

While certainly not scientific, it's probably about the best stash of info on PC gamers as a whole...

 

Also, an Ars Technica article about the apparent 720p and 900p resolutions that the XBox One and PS4 are running BF4 at, respectively.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/10/op-ed-why-im-not-too-worked-up-about-the-next-gen-console-resolution-wars/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sony's gaming entertainment division profits dropped last year because of lack lustre sales.

 

You have to remember that mobile gaming is hitting pc's and consoles.

 

However, I don't have the figures, but I think valve's profits are continually going in the right direction.

 

I think the ps4 / xbone generation will see a tough battle, especially in their later years.

 

I think there are also diminishing returns on graphics improvements. The amount of effort to improve the graphics by 10% is quite high and consumers are now looking for content. I don't think hardware will remain a bottleneck for the industry and, in a few years, you might be able to pick up a steam box for £250 which will play everything except PS4 exclusives. As mentioned above, your likely to see exclusives less and less as it becomes harder to make profit on a single platform.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Sony's gaming entertainment division profits dropped last year because of lack lustre sales

 

Of course profits are down in a transition year. People are spending less as they are waiting for the new consoles, and Sony is spending more on marketing, developing and manufacturing the PS4.

 

It doesn't really represent any sort of trend. If it continually declines over several years then it represents a trend. Most AAA publishers are likely operating at a loss over the last two quarters, compounded by the expense of transitioning to new hardware, and will make most of their money in the current quarter, mostly on current gen games due to the initial low install base of the next gen platforms.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@tychon and @FuzzyRhombus, who says you can't do that kind of gaming on a pc? 

As I said before, you technically could, but this VVV

 

Why do people use consoles? It's easier. There's no need to worry about anything. Get the game, put it in the console, and it runs.

It's not that big of a hassle to hook up your laptop and play by yourself. But who has 4 controllers hooked up and mapped on their PC? Besides that, probably 5% or less of PC games made after 1995 have support for that haha.
But, those games are rare enough even on consoles nowadays sadly, so there does seem to be more of a convergence.  As this distinction line becomes thinner, it's just a matter of choice. But if games become vastly multiplatform, I really see no reason to opt for a console if you already have a decent enough computer.
 
It's the same idea with mobile gaming. Look at iPhones and powerful Android phones. They're all just as powerful if not more than the 3DS or Vita. The handhelds mainly have it's games going for them, but also they have a proper controller. But with all the compact controller attachments coming out for smartphones, that argument becomes nil. If you could get all those games on a device you already have, get a small attachment, why bother getting another system?
 
I doubt consoles will die out within the next generation or so, they've just evolve more and more into dumbed-down pc's or media centers. But the attraction that consoles once had is disappearing.
 

 

 

The Steam hardware & Software Survey looks to be showing about 35% of players using 1080p or higher resolutions. So while the technical capability is there, it looks like a pretty decent sized majority of PC gamers are also failing to experience the games at HD resolutions.

 

That's surprising, couldn't imagine anything less than 1080p on tv or computer screen anymore. And to think we used to play games in 640x480 or less!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When people were using 640x480 the computer screens were about 12 inch. I actually wondered why the dpi was staying nearly the same for so long.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On average, but not always. Either way, you just can't fit as much on those screen and get as much detail.

 

It was more a limitation of crts. Now that lcd and led can squeeze out higher dpis for much lower cost. And easier to manufacture

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the only reason you buy a console is to play specific exclusive games, than they are dying..I mean, the only reason for their survival is the monopoly of some games? thats not a strong reason, imo.

Actually...its a hell of strong reason, it works like a charm, but its indeed a really fucked up reason to buy a console: due a marketing move consoles survives, while everyone would prefer to buy a computer if there was no exclusives? Shouldnt ppl be blaming devs/companies for that?

Hmmm..Im not really sure about this, its like moving against natural evolution get what I mean? But I also dont think its fair to a company shoot itself on the foot..(if nintendo allowed pokemon to be released on PC, just imagine the drop on nintendo mobiles..but wouldnt it be awesome for players?)

 

 

Plus, ppl keep saying consoles are easier. You dont get that everyone have a computer these days, is not that they will buy one just for playing, it ends up being more lucrative buying one that can also support games on average quality (average quality on pc = console quality).

Compare to smart phones. Ppl play a lot of games due smartphones just being able to, they dont buy it for gaming. Notebooks come with built config, like buying a console, its a matter of asking for one that can play games.

 

Though my reality of prices are very different of yours..theres no way I can sustain playing console games

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont get that everyone have a computer these days

I have a lot of (non-techy) friends who just have a console and a smartphone tongue.png Or those two things and a really cheap laptop that's not at all capable of modern games, and even if it was, is far, far more technical than "you put in the disc and you play". They play facebook games, and other web games on these. They don't buy the new COD for their crappy laptop.

Edited by Hodgman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0