• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
suliman

Does this work? (clear enough)

15 posts in this topic

Hi

Im doing a multiplayer RTS in a medieval setting:

 

screen1.jpg

 

You build cities and regiments of soldiers that you move as you would in warcraft or dune 2, only the scale is larger (each unit is hundreds of soldiers). But ranged unit still fire projectiles on enemies like 5 tiles away so they will be visible (melee units fight when they "touch").

 

1. So does simple symbols work for different units? (on screen is peasants, swordmen and spearmen)

2. Otherwise what would i have? Tiles are to small to add animated units and i also wanna avoid the extra work (im alone on this hobby project)

3. I need to have some health bar on each unit. Any idea on how to avoid it being to cluttered?

4. Different teams. The yellow ones onscreen are enemies. Clear enough?

 

Thanks!

Erik

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks pretty cool. Some things to consider:

1. You might want to consider represent the units with, well units, and not weapons. Doesn't have to be animated, but just units(like in Archon or the original Civ).

2. It's hard to differentiate the units from the cities. Different shape will do the trick (units are round, cities are square).

3. For health, you can put a small bar on the top of the unit (again, a-la Civ). If you don't have space for a bar, use the outline of the circle to represent health.

4. For different units - use different background color. The foreground is not very noticeable.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think having a little guy with a spear etc instead of just the weapon will be too small, and thereby too hard to differentiate the different types (like 10-12 types) sadly...

For example i have both spear and pikes. And as symbols its ok. But as actual units i think it will be too small.

 

Otherwise good points. Anyone else?

Edited by suliman
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would halp with instant recognition if the tools/weapons were not all at the same angle.

Yeah, peasants with pitchforks facing down vs soldiers with raised weapons would make more sense. Or perhaps raised swords vs horizontal pikes vs bows raised to 45 degrees? And then mirror all the enemies, so everything is facing the opposite direction for them.

 

I would add a colored border around units or have a colored interior with a dark outline, the weapons are too small to be easily differentiated I think.

 

Or scratch that- like N.I.B. said,  you could put a circular health bar around the units, which would turn green to red clockwise. In my experience small linear health bars are less disruptive than you might think, though, so I wouldn't be afraid to try that approach, too. I also agree that buildings should be a different shape from mobile units.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the round icons visually but gameplay wise I have to say they feel more like an abstraction than an actual Spearman or Peasant. Perhaps it is also about them aligning perfectly with each other since they snap to grid cells that makes them look unnatural. It would be totally appropriate to use this kind of non-personifying icon in HUD to say "you have this many of this unit alive" but those icons roaming around the woods doing this and that seems out of place.

 

Another thing is what many people comment on: when you try to get a good grasp on the situation and glance around, everything is just black circles. You have to focus on each unit to see which unit it is and who it belongs to.

 

Since you're asking for feedback on visuals I would recommend you to try to make rudimentary characters (how about just a chess set type of pawn with some distinguishing accessories?) and use more "user colors" in them in some way. You have more pixels than what some of the old RTS games had so it shouldn't be problem but it does begin to be a pixel art task rather than general graphics task. Everything suggests you could do it and I could see characters improving your looks considerably. You wouldn't have to animate them if you don't have time for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So make small static characters holding the weapons would be better?
I tried a bit but it was hard to make them distinct enough to tell them apart... But i agree it looks a bit dull like this :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think symbols are fine; they immediately convey the relevant information that an entire person might be more difficult to convey.

 

I agree with Sun and Shadows, that the weapons need to be pointed at different angles.

Also, the spear is hard to discern what it is supposed to be at the level of zoom.

Thirdly, I wouldn't color the weapon itself, I'd color the background of the icon to more visually tell friend from foe.

 

Here's a mockup of the changes:

kewz.png

 

(Note: In my sloppy mockup, the shading of the weapons and buildings themselves were accidentally colored. They shouldn't be colored, only the background circles should be colored)

 

Fourth, I also agree with ShadowFlar3, and came to the same conclusion myself, that it might feel a bit more "human" if the icons weren't perfectly aligned, but were each randomly shifted negatively or positively a few pixels on the horizontal and vertical axis. Here's an example of what that might look like:

 

ra58.png

 

You could do this nicely and more uniformly by saying: Every 4th column, offset the Y position of the icon by 3 pixels, Every 3rd column, offset by -1 pixels, Every 2nd column, offset by -2 pixels and +1 pixels horizontally, every 1st column, offset by +1 pixels. Then tweak it until it looks right. Actually, instead of each column and each row, get the index, and mod that to lookup in an array the offset.

int mapIndex = (tileY * map_width) + tileX;
std::vector<Offset2D> offsets;
iconOffset = offsets[mapIndex % offsets.size()];

A few tiny offsets would give a much less rigid look to the icon placements.

 

The spear icon still is too hard to see. Perhaps have just an enlarged spear head with only a few inches of the shaft for an icon, instead of the entire spear, that way it'd be much more visible (and as a triangular shape, it'd have a much more distinctively different shape than the other icons as well).

 

Your artwork looks good, btw!

Edited by Servant of the Lord
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Ok tried some stuff. But its hard:)

 

Symbols to the left, actual units to the right. Smaller (full figure with all of legs included) didnt work at all. I think these mid-sized figures (to the right in the image) will be hard also since there is so many different unit types. This is only 3 types...

 

Any ideas? Maybe the map itself makes it hard... And tiles are small, but they need to be this small.

 

[url=http://postimg.org/image/o3kt6d6up/]screen2.jpg[/url]

Edited by suliman
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I was talking about. Symbols vs actual units.

 

I prefer the ones on the right but I believe it's really about opinion and how you view such games. Do you want a more "overlord resource management" feeling where you look at abstraction data like a map with symbols in a tent and tell your messengers to send message about what each unit should do and are only interested in numbers and results. Or are you actually in the same scene witnessing the individual people doing the actions and ordering them as they go.

 

I believe lots of the problems you are having with creating the art is the fact that all units have the same dimensions and outline where as traditionally stronger units are bigger in pixel size. If you have a clear order of superiority in the units you can also reflect it inside the icon. Weak icon characters could be small with lots of black and strong units could have bigger characters with more white in them so you could also visually grade some battles at one glance even if you needed to further check the types in more depth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The units on the right are quite nice aesthetically but I still have a hard time telling which unit is which. An RTS might be just twitchy enough that you don't want to sit trying to figure out which units are which. I think you need to make it just as easy to tell what weapon the unit carries as you do the team color.

What about something such that you have the circle the same color for both sides again (perhaps a lighter grey than originally) and then the figures like you have on the right side but in their team color instead of white, and then have the weapon they're carrying another prominent color appropriate to the team? Something so that there's a little more than just the two colors to define the edges.

My art skills aren't that great and I don't know for sure if it would turn out ok but it should be simple enough a change to give it a try.
 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another try:)

If i make them much bigger, and use the unit info card (that i already had for each unit type), how does this work? Rough sketchup. This demands that unit move/pathfind in larger tiles, made up of 2x2 maptiles, or that i make the maptiles much larger, which may not look nice...

 

[url=http://postimg.org/image/5uwy7o6fd/]screen3.jpg[/url]
Edited by suliman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, you sure have come far from where you started. The icons look great and the critical viewers' attention now turns to lower definition background. :D

 

I'm sure the players could learn to recognize these icons and intuitively know what they do. If you want to, you can try highlighting ( ~ brightening ) the differences in them (most notably the weapon gear perhaps).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the terrain look blurry? I should redraw the original graphics instead of scale which i do now.

 

The background around the units could be nicer, and more sharp as well. I think i need this size, as i now have room for healthbar and promotions on each unit.

Edited by suliman
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I like the weapons symbols more than the person outlines, though those latest images seem distinguishable enough.  I just think it gives it a "pure strategy game" feel if the display serves to tell you exactly what you need to know.  If you're looking to sell the game though, some visual flare is certainly a good idea. 

 


3. I need to have some health bar on each unit. Any idea on how to avoid it being to cluttered?

Instead of a life bar beneath each unit, you could put a green ring around the unit's circle icon.  As they lose health, a portion of the ring turns red.  Just make sure the red and green portions won't blend in with either the rest of the unit's icon or the background battlefield.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0