Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Opengl Linux

This topic is 1512 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

So, this is a pretty dumb question.

 

But how do I get Opengl 3.3+ running on linux.

 

Atm glxinfo gives me the info: 3.0 Mesa 8.0.5

My graphics driver is Nvidia geforce GT 630M (2GB)

 

I've tried (and still am trying) to get Mesa 9.2.3 running.

I've got problems installing it.

 

I do know that Mesa 10 will be released quite soon, which supports 3.3.

But there have to be different options.

 

I also found the linux x64 (amd64/em64t) display driver on Nvidia website. But I don't know whether it supports opengl 3.3+

 

What I do know is that on my windows partition I got opengl 4.0 running.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why would you want to use mesa if you have a good graphics card? Just install nvidia's graphics drivers, preferably through your distro's package manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The process for getting OpenGL running on any platform is pretty much the same, however, with a GL 3.2+ context , a little more work is involved.

1. Create a system specific window using the system provided api.

2. Create an OpenGL context from the previously provided window device context.

There at one of examples showing how to create OpenGL context....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mesa is a software renderer http://www.mesa3d.org/

To get OpenGL to work on linux can be an adventure sometimes, since as a developer it's likely you want the latest

In my case I went the hardcore route and failed many times (I had to use terminal shell to fix xorg after completely breaking it)

 

So goes my warning: Installing the nvidia linux driver manually IS NOT WORTH IT

 

Fortunately if you have ubuntu, there are some simple and safe ways:

 

1. Use the nvidia-current branch (which is new enough for most cases)

You will find it in the Ubuntu Software Center

 

2. Use the edgers repo (from terminal):

a) Add the edgers repo

sudo apt-add-repository ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa

b) Update index files

sudo apt-get update

c) Install any of the nvidia packages, such as the very latest (as of this post):

sudo apt-get install nvidia-331

Edited by Kaptein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some day I will get these problems people speak about using nVidia's installer and I'll share their pain, but for me right now, it can't get easier than sh'ing the installer and let it do its job.

 

What actually never worked for me is the dkms that should, in theory, automagically recompile the driver each time I upgrade the kernel. Probably I'm missing something though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses

 

Mesa is a software renderer http://www.mesa3d.org/

To get OpenGL to work on linux can be an adventure sometimes, since as a developer it's likely you want the latest

In my case I went the hardcore route and failed many times (I had to use terminal shell to fix xorg after completely breaking it)

 

So goes my warning: Installing the nvidia linux driver manually IS NOT WORTH IT

 

Fortunately if you have ubuntu, there are some simple and safe ways:

 

1. Use the nvidia-current branch (which is new enough for most cases)

You will find it in the Ubuntu Software Center

 

2. Use the edgers repo (from terminal):

a) Add the edgers repo

sudo apt-add-repository ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa

b) Update index files

sudo apt-get update

c) Install any of the nvidia packages, such as the very latest (as of this post):

sudo apt-get install nvidia-331

 

I'm using debian weezy.

And yes, I tried to install manually. (so bad)

Somehow I messed up my whole system.

Everything was broken, I could barely login (even through recovery mode)

 

I had to reinstall the system.

 

I'm searching around the web how I could install the drivers.
But each time I try something, x won't run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm those ppa etc. Nvidia repos never worked for me. I go with default and later update manually. Currently Nvidia is at OpenGL 4.3 or even 4.4.

Edited by FGFS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Mesa is a software renderer http://www.mesa3d.org/

Mesa does 3D acceleration for many chips.

 

Um, no.  Well, sorta, in that it can use LLVMpipe to JIT the software rendering.  Generally, on Linux, the hardware does the hardware acceleration (using the proprietary blobs or the free driver equivalents).  Like on Windows, you link against the GL API provided by Mesa but the runtime is provided by the hardware vendors (through kernel DRM -- direct rendering module).  That's one reason why installing the nVidia drivers from nVidia is bad: they blow away the Mesa libraries, which means if you're a developer and upgrade the -dev package you will experience open running sores and purulent boils.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, no. Well, sorta, in that it can use LLVMpipe to JIT the software rendering. Generally, on Linux, the hardware does the hardware acceleration (using the proprietary blobs or the free driver equivalents).


Um, yes. Well, sorta. Most of the open source hardware 3D drivers use Mesa as a front end - a bit like Microsoft writing D3D and the hardware manufacturers only needing to write a relatively small hardware specific bit rather than a full 3Dstack like they do with OpenGL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 1512 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now