• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AverageJoeSSU

Modelling Stylized "high fidelity" environments for games.

3 posts in this topic

I'm a bit surprised at how little information there is on this.

 

Perhaps because it is lumped in with general modelling techniques, but I find that when it comes to modelling a "game level" there are a lot of things that are just different.

 

Of course a lot of tips can be found on Valves modelling reference wiki:

https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Category:Level_Design

 

But when it comes to the modelling aspect of it, what are some good things to take into account?

 

I use Maya and Zbrush. I can create high detail models all day in zbrush, but can get in trouble if i dont provide a base mesh first. And Zbrush is getting so fancy now with panel loops and things, that i can easily, drastically change the topo of a mesh with high fidelity detail. I'm sure that i could just go back to the base mesh and move it around, but is this the "correct" way to do things?

 

I've heard that good environments are simple in areas that are not the focus of the player and complex in areas that are.

 

I've also heard that simple color palletes (maybe a little more saturated too?) help achieve a clean look.

 

Also, what about keeping a room a singlular hull of geometry? is this really neccessary?

 

Any other tips would help a great deal. I am between intermidiate and noob with Maya and Zbrush when it comes to flat out modelling stuff.

(i know how to rig and animate).

 

Thanks!

Edited by AverageJoeSSU
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The crux of these issues is discovering or making a workflow pipeline.   After that, you can go to the several online communities involved with the software creation like your pipeline and get more information. 

 

Of course, once you settle on the basics, you may come here for specific questions and get precise answers.

 

 


I've also heard that simple color palletes (maybe a little more saturated too?) help achieve a clean look.

 

What is a "clean look" can be attractive to some people and boring to others. It's a matter of preference.  A little market research into what exactly appeals to your target segment of the market is crucial or you will be mostly guessing for quite a while. This is why beta testing and demo back feed are so important.

 

Of course, some things just beg for a "clean look" such as the paint finish on a sports car, for example, or the face of a clock or instrument gauge.

 

Also, what about keeping a room a singlular hull of geometry? is this really neccessary?

 

That depends on different factors such as performance demands, time (and therefore budget) available to work on it, UV mapping ability and speed of the artist or brush skill in your case, and the variance of the environment such as terrain elevation variety which can force you to more customize the shape of things.

 

Only experience can resolve some of these things in you.

 

Any other tips would help a great deal. I am between intermidiate and noob with Maya and Zbrush when it comes to flat out modelling stuff.

(i know how to rig and animate).

 

Though I don't use Maya and Zbrush, they are great.  Workflow pipeline demand has taken me to other software, but the general principles are the same.

 

1) Try to duplicate surfaces and UV maps as much as possible to help performance issues in a game.

2) Keep polygonal count of every model and part as small as possible and depend more on texture appearance rather than geometry.

3) Use 2D surfaces instead of polyhedrons as much as possible.

4) Keep ray tracing and path finding to the minimum that you can.

5) The fewer the files in the model folder, then the better, such as material files, animation files, ray tracing files, color files, brush files, and so forth. Keep the size of these files as small as you artistically can, too.

6) Keep a permanent storage of your work in progress (WIP) folders for future proof of your work and taking components for future projects, both 2D and 3D.

7) Make a WIP stage copy of your work every 10-20 minutes incase you make a huge blunder or your system crashes, as well as for proof of creation records.

8) Do not reinvent the wheel, so to speak, but reuse and modify already existing art work as much as possible within your license rights.

9) UV mapping, 2D image manipulation (such as GIMP), and brushes should all be used in 3D games, depending on artistic preference and performance issues.

10) Learn the positive habit of doing quick "over once" work and then return in the following cycles of art creation to refine each artwork. This can also apply to the game as a whole when you get all your basic "place holder" unfinished assets into the game to test for performance before you go to the next cycle to finish the art assets.  This saves much time in the long run due to realizing exactly how large and how many assets is appropriate for performance and appearance in the game. For example, if I made about 20 too many types of buildings that game performance would allow, then I just wasted a few weeks of time.  rolleyes.gif  LOL  If I go and finish each model before I do a game test of all the models together in the game as unfinished place holders, then I am at high risk of having to remake models, as well.

11)  The goal is "made right, first time every time".  Though not always possible, this is most efficient and the industry standard for artists.

 

With 3 1/2 years in the game and simulation development industry, I feel that this set of advice is trustworthy.  smile.png

Edited by 3Ddreamer
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply!

 

Those are some really good tips. And yes it seems i am trying to discover what the workflow will work for the project i am working on.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The workflow is heavily influence by the pipeline. wink.png

 

Keep working hard at it and it will be fine.  smile.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0