• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Suggestion for a cross-platform C++ 3D game engine/framework

49 posts in this topic

JTippetts, thanks for the Urho3D promotion (again smile.png) To clarify a bit, I have high respect for Ogre for teaching me about scene graphs, 3D math, rendering and animation. But as I learned more, I began to understand the deficiencies.


And yes, just to confirm, Urho3D only uses OpenGL up to the 2.0 spec and some extensions. It also does not load resources in the background, as of now.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Well, again, Ogre3D is a matter of taste. I didn't like it.


I could code DX or OGL, but this is what I'm trying to avoid, since I want to make games and not engines.


Polycode looks nice! Ill check it better in comparison to Magnum I mentioned earlier. Those two looks very solid for me!

Yes, I understand that, but your statement that it has a bad architecture is not a matter of taste; that's what I meant to correct. Ogre3D has a very simple and, more importantly, functional architecture.


Also, making engines is a part of making games, there are just some cases where you can find this part of your job done for you by someone else. Usually this doesn't happen when you step up from simple games to complex games, so we go engine hunting for something that doesn't exist; this is when one has to step up and really do the not-so-satisfying job of implementing boring stuff...

Edited by dejaime

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

[Edit] I know there is Unity3D, but for me it looks like a tool where you create content, put it all together, write few scripts and you got a game.

While I do want to make games, I also get great satisfaction from Programming.

Hello. I hadn't read this edit of yours before.


In what way do you expect to create any game other than creating content and putting it together? Whatever engine you pick, these are the things that you will always have to do.

I don't understand how this, for you, is a negative point towards Unity.

Note that I didn't mention the scripting because it's included in "content" as well (shaders and logic code are assets just like art and sound). 


Regarding that "write a few scripts" clause:

A) You won't write a few or a lot of scripts; You will write the precise amount that you need for your game to work - it depends on the complexity of your game, not the engine that you're using.

B) Any original game with original content that you set to make will be a challenging task and require a lot of scripts, regardless of the tool you use.


Getting satisfaction from programming vs scripting.

Scripting is programming, only without requiring an explicit compilation step: http://stackoverflow.com/a/17253557

You will still deal with algorithms, conditioning, program flow, debugging etc., if this is what gives you satisfaction.


So I suggest that you revise your opinion of Unity and other engines that you may have disregarded because of this, as they might just be what you're looking for.

Instead of seeing features as "taking away control from you", try to see them as "facilitating production" so that you can reach your goal faster: make a finished, polished game.


Edited by Kryzon

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leadwerks supports pretty much everything on your list. If you code in C++ (it has lua also) you can structure your game however you want. It doesn't lock you, or highly suggest a design pattern like Unity does. This can be good or bad but you said you like coding so I would think you would love it.


It's Lua scripting has more of a pattern to it. You can mix and match C++ & Lua. I've exposed RakNet to it's Lua bindings so you can do a lot with it.


It's OpenGL and the new version (out in dec) is the latest version and Linux support.


It has Mac, Windows, Android, & iOS with Linux coming in Dec.


It's entity based which makes programming with it really fun and easy.


It has a nice and clean API.


It has a nice editor and supporting tools.


No GUI but you can plug whatever 3rd party into it.

Edited by rpiller

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Yes I know that Ogre is just a graphics engine. But it have "Addons" for OpenAL, ODE, CEGUI and etc.

What do you recommend then, apart from C4?

Setting up those libraries to work with Ogre3D isn't as simple as downloading and installing an add-on for some software. I recommend you go for a game engine that satisfies most of your needs in order to create the game you want to create. Why would you put together bits and pieces to create something that you already know you want, a game engine.


Thats the most sane suggestion I got smile.png But still there is an issue, read the last paragraph of this post.



Panda looks nice, and to be honest I have nothing against python.



Thanks for clarifying this information!



Fair point, I take my words back. I'm not the man to judge about Ogre architecture, however I still dislike it, maybe because I havent really went that far with it, maybe because its tutorials are bad for me.

By the way, you have a point it "engine is part of a game", sounds like a wise suggestion.



About Unity.

I know what programming is, and I know what scripting is (I am a programmer with more than 10 years experience in both compiling and interpreted languages).

And I know that scripting could be fun. But for me, and maybe I'm mistaken, Unity, looks like a tool for someone who dont like to program or dont know to program. I see it more as a tool for modelers and general content creators (audio, graphics) but not for programmers. Learning scripting language like JavaScript is a matter of hours or maximum few days. I know it, because I work in an internet industry when every one who read few tutorials about JS programs web sites. I do not under estimate those people, dont get me wrong. But I get great satisfaction from programming, if you are programmer who really likes it and can code for 12 hours in a row, you should understand me. Also, Unity does not have Linux client and I dont have access to windows machine right now.



Thanks, Ill take a look into it.



Isnt UDK a sort of Unity?



The problem with programming, is that no body really cares how the code looks. It could be the best architecture code you will ever see, but if the graphics is not astonishing, if there is no sound effect, no story, well it will be hard to success in the field of game development. I'm a one man team, I can't handle everything alone, imagine me writing something similar to Ogre3D, then adding physics to it, sound, UI, AI, scripting. It will take me years just to do this, and thats even before I wrote a single line of my game.

So what I'm trying to accomplish is to be satisfied in the field I like and to reach my goal. This requires from me to do some compromises.

And the problem is that I cannot find the golden center between enough challenging programming and ability to complete a game (even for the level of pre-release to show to other people who might be interested in funding the game and or joining as part of the team).

Edited by skwee

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also you go with Unity. Your are mistaken in thinking that it's a tool for "artists", in fact you can't even model in the editor AFAIK. The scene viewer is there to help you build a scene and that's all.

You can certainly do clever programming with it with various languages (not ony Javascript) and you can even fairly easily extend the editor to create your own tools. The only lack of control you have is over things you don't really need much control anyway, like the main loop of your game...


I have used Ogre before, and indeed the samples suck. I built a game engine (and a 2D platformer game prototype with it) with scripting (Mono), sound, physics etc and the more I wanted to do with Ogre, the more it would set me back. I tried to contribute patches, but response was so slow that I gave up doing it. It works fine if you don't intend to be able to customize every little thing.

Also, I'm not sure about it's D3D renderer, but the GL one is pretty badly optimized, generating a HUGE amount of redundant calls.


After finishing the game prototype with Ogre I decided I would've been able to do a much better game in much less time with Unity, and have since begun to explore it. I'm more into extending the editor for now to create tools for level creating (working great so far), but I'm loving it!


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put forth my own framework, Sigma, that is still very WIP (the read me is very out-of-date). It has most bullet points you went (graphics is still shaping up, so no animations, particles, etc yet) and the sound is to be added (this weekend).

  • It is pure C++ and takes advantage of some C++11.
  • It works on Linux and Win32 (Mac testing is in the works).
  • It uses GLFW for the OS abstraction layer (user input via mouse/keyboard works but it can also do controllers).
  • OpenGL 3+ using a custom rendering engine.
  • Bullet Physics.
  • and of course HTML based UI using chrome (CEF in the works, but currently has Awesomium.
It is being used for the Trillek engine (and is what is powering the milestone 1 release). You can contribute if you would like as well since we are a small sparse team of developers that are open to work from others. And let's not forgot the link Sigma.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By UNNYHOG
      Hello, Colleagues!
      We have been working on our newest Fantasy style Gesture based MOBA game for a long time and it's releasing on Steam on July 26. Meanwhile you can already try it out by downloading our launcher from the website.
      Any feedback is welcome here. Thank you.
      If you don't want to play, I would love to share with you our teaser : 
    • By Scouting Ninja
      So I am working on a mobile game.
      It uses slides for a story, the slides are very large. Each slide is almost 2048*2048; the max texture loading size I am using for the game.
      My problem is that Unity keeps each slide in the memory after it's loaded, even when it will show only once per game. This leads to the game crashing on older mobiles.
      My idea was to destroy each object after it was shown using a coroutine, so it deletes the past slide and loads the next slide. This worked because instead of crashing on 23 slides it crashed on 48 slides.
      After some profiling I realized that destroy() isn't clearing all the memory that a slide used.
      What I want to do now is assign a limited amount of memory as a slide slot. Then I need some way to unload the slide from the slot, freeing the slot for the next slide; without Unity storing the slides in the memory.
      Any ideas on how I would do this? 
    • By LoverSoul
      Hello everyone.
      I had a problem with transferring my character from the creation editor to the game engine. I created the character in Adobe Fuse, then imported it to Mixamo to put rig and animation.
      However, the appearance of my character has deteriorated significantly, and after importing into Unity, the character even began to look like a meme from the Assassin's Creed. Can you please tell me how I can fix all this so that my character's hair does not look like bits of bacon sticking to her head, and her eyes and mouth have taken their stable position in the skull?
      Thank you for attention.

    • By ilovegames
      Simulator driving with two modes of play - a race and free game in the open world!   Features: - 2 game modes - race and free game - 3 modes of transport - Buggy, ATV, Jeep - The open world - Realistic control - Modern graphics

    • By NajeNDa
      Hi there,
      I am a game programmer (C#/C++) who is looking for a project to join. I am computer science engineer plus Master Degree in Game Development, currently working in one the most renown mobile games company (2 yeras academic experience, 1 year working experience).
      I have developed several prototypes or even games almost ready to release, but I always lack of artists, so I am looking for a project already set up or few artist to begin working in something.
      My preferences are:
      Unity or Unreal Engine 4 based project (UE4 prefered) PC/Console game prefered but mobile is accepted too Not interested in VR Serious team with almost all the roles filled or pretending to be filled 3D project prefered over 2D Guaranteed 7 work hours per week, Crunch 20 work hours per week  European team (if timezone is not a problem for you, so its not for me) I am not looking for any kind of money income from games neither the team, I want to do this as a hobby and a way to improve my skills.
  • Popular Now