• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
pressgreen

Qestion about passing incremented values

6 posts in this topic

Ok, so I completely understand the recursive portion of the Merge Sort algorithm but what I am having problems with is this example of the actual merge portion of the algorithm. In the first conditional statement were one is comparing the first element of the two input vectors I understand, but its the next line were p1 or p2 are being incremented up 1, while specifying which element is to be moved on to the empty vector, I am not understanding. Is it adding element 0 and then ++ to element 1 for the next comparison or is it passing element 1?

 

I guess my main question is, does the value of a variable get read first and then incremented or is the variables' value incremented and then read?

 

int newVariable = 0, oldVariableX = 0;

 

newVariable = oldVariableX++

 

Does  ( newVariable = 0   or   newVarivable = 1  ) ?

void Merge(Vector<int> & vec, Vector<int> & v1, Vector<int> & v2) 
{
     int n1 = v1.size();
     int n2 = v2.size();
     int p1 = 0;
     int p2 = 0;
     while (p1 < n1 && p2 < n2) {
         if (v1[p1] < v2[p2]) {
          vec.add(v1[p1++]);
         } else {
          vec.add(v2[p2++]);
         }
     }
    while (p1 < n1) vec.add(v1[p1++]);
    while (p2 < n2) vec.add(v2[p2++]);
}
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prefixed increases are more elegant on a computational cost point of view.

 

When you put the increment before the variable, the machine will actually increment and then use that already incremented variable.

In contrast, if you use the postfixed increment, the machine will "create a copy" the value of the variable, increment the variable and then use the (not incremented) copied value; a more costly operation.

 

Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong here.

 

Answering your question, newVariable would equal to 0.

If you used ++oldVariable instead, it would equal to 1.

Edited by dejaime
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually with that said and now understanding the incrementing better, Why are there two more while loops placed at the end of this function? I mean should not the first while loop be filling the empty vector with sorted merged values from the input vectors?

 

Why are they adding these last two while loops?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: Rephrased this... several times, actually.

 

The first while loop checks if both input vectors have unmerged entries. If they both have unmerged entries, it compares which is the smaller of the 2, and merges that into the output vector.

 

After doing this, it merges the remaining vectors, by just merging whatever is left in vector1, then vector2.

Either vector1 or vector2 will be empty at this point (due to the first while loop having been completed), so the final part really just merges the remaining vector in at the end.

Edited by CoreLactose
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0