Sign in to follow this  
jamesxli

DX11 Access vertices & indies buffer from the compute shader

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I am trying to implement a compute shader (with DX11&SlimDX) to sort a list vertices based their depth (z-coordinates). In order to minimize the data traffics between CPU and GPU, I would like to do the sorting completely on GPU with a compute shader. Does anyone know a way to access the vertices and indices buffer from a compute shader?  Does anyone even by chance know a sample HLSL implementation of a sorting algorithm? It is really hard to find anything other than trivial on Internet about compute shader. Any help would greatly appreciated.

 

James

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Does anyone know a way to access the vertices and indices buffer from a compute shader?

The only way to get data into a compute shader is through a UAV, an SRV, or a constant buffer - so your input to the shader has to be one of those three options.  Constant buffers are probably not a good choice, since their data can't change (hence the constant name :) ).  SRVs are probably also not a great choice, since you will need to eventually store the data back to a buffer after you have sorted it.  So most likely you would want to use a UAV to access the data, sort it, and then store it back to the UAV resource.  Another option is to read the data from the SRV and write it to a UAV, which may help you with managing the data in flight.

 

Be aware that there are restrictions about which bind and usage flags a vertex buffer can have (test them out yourself - try creating a buffer resource with multiple combinations of bind flags, and also usage flags as well).  This may force you to make an extra buffer that serves as a go-between for your algorithm passes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. But I am still some what confused. If I create an RWStructuredBuffer<uint> with an UAV to access the index buffer, how can I move the content of the index buffer to the UAV buffer, and how do I store the modified data back to the index buffer?  I have tried to call CopyResource(idxBuffer, idxUavBuffer) and CopyResource(idxUavBuffer, idxBuffer) on the CPU side,  but these calls seemed to do nothing (and the don't cause any errors or exceptions either.) I have tried some different option combinations for the UAV buffer (BindFlags, OptionFlags, Usage, etc), but without luck so far. Should I just try more different combinations?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RWStructuredBuffer<uint> is the resource representation in HLSL, and you use a UAV to bind the resource to the pipeline on the C++ side.  So in that case, the UAV and the RWStructuredBuffer<uint> are representing the same resource, just in different domains.

 

CopyResource is a way to copy the contents of one resource to another.  If you are starting out with an index buffer, and you want to copy it to another resource that has the ability to be bound as a UAV, then you would use copy resource to do that prior to invoking your compute shader.

 

The RWStructuredBuffer is actually the source of your data within the compute shader, and you will also need to write the sorted data back into it.  That's where the name RW comes from - it is for reading and writing.

 

It sounds to me like you are unfamiliar with resources in D3D11 - I would recommend spending a bit of time with a good book to get familiar.  Otherwise it will be a long hard struggle to get something trivially working...  Any time that you invest in learning about resources is time well spent, so go for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Jason. It is indeed frustrating to code for GPU without good understanding of all those new concepts.  After thoroughly cleaned up my code, I got the code working. I basically creates RW buffers (UAVs) for the sorting algorithm, and used the CopyResource() to copy data between compute and vertex shader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627678
    • Total Posts
      2978605
  • Similar Content

    • By evelyn4you
      hi,
      i have read very much about the binding of a constantbuffer to a shader but something is still unclear to me.
      e.g. when performing :   vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer,  slot )
       is the buffer bound
      a.  to the VertexShaderStage
      or
      b. to the VertexShader that is currently set as the active VertexShader
      Is it possible to bind a constantBuffer to a VertexShader e.g. VS_A and keep this binding even after the active VertexShader has changed ?
      I mean i want to bind constantbuffer_A  to VS_A, an Constantbuffer_B to VS_B  and  only use updateSubresource without using setConstantBuffer command every time.

      Look at this example:
      SetVertexShader ( VS_A )
      updateSubresource(buffer_A)
      vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer_A,  slot_A )
      perform drawcall       ( buffer_A is used )

      SetVertexShader ( VS_B )
      updateSubresource(buffer_B)
      vertexshader.setConstantbuffer ( buffer_B,  slot_A )
      perform drawcall   ( buffer_B is used )
      SetVertexShader ( VS_A )
      perform drawcall   (now which buffer is used ??? )
       
      I ask this question because i have made a custom render engine an want to optimize to
      the minimum  updateSubresource, and setConstantbuffer  calls
       
       
       
       
       
    • By noodleBowl
      I got a quick question about buffers when it comes to DirectX 11. If I bind a buffer using a command like:
      IASetVertexBuffers IASetIndexBuffer VSSetConstantBuffers PSSetConstantBuffers  and then later on I update that bound buffer's data using commands like Map/Unmap or any of the other update commands.
      Do I need to rebind the buffer again in order for my update to take effect? If I dont rebind is that really bad as in I get a performance hit? My thought process behind this is that if the buffer is already bound why do I need to rebind it? I'm using that same buffer it is just different data
       
    • By Rockmover
      I am really stuck with something that should be very simple in DirectX 11. 
      1. I can draw lines using a PC (position, colored) vertices and a simple shader just fine.
      2. I can draw 3D triangles using PCN (position, colored, normal) vertices just fine (even transparency and SpecularBlinnPhong shaders).
       
      However, if I'm using my 3D shader, and I want to draw my PC lines in the same scene how can I do that?
       
      If I change my lines to PCN and pass them to the 3D shader with my triangles, then the lighting screws them all up.  I only want the lighting for the 3D triangles, but no SpecularBlinnPhong/Lighting for the lines (just PC). 
      I am sure this is because if I change the lines to PNC there is not really a correct "normal" for the lines.  
      I assume I somehow need to draw the 3D triangles using one shader, and then "switch" to another shader and draw the lines?  But I have no clue how to use two different shaders in the same scene.  And then are the lines just drawn on top of the triangles, or vice versa (maybe draw order dependent)?  
      I must be missing something really basic, so if anyone can just point me in the right direction (or link to an example showing the implementation of multiple shaders) that would be REALLY appreciated.
       
      I'm also more than happy to post my simple test code if that helps as well!
       
      THANKS SO MUCH IN ADVANCE!!!
    • By Reitano
      Hi,
      I am writing a linear allocator of per-frame constants using the DirectX 11.1 API. My plan is to replace the traditional constant allocation strategy, where most of the work is done by the driver behind my back, with a manual one inspired by the DirectX 12 and Vulkan APIs.
      In brief, the allocator maintains a list of 64K pages, each page owns a constant buffer managed as a ring buffer. Each page has a history of the N previous frames. At the beginning of a new frame, the allocator retires the frames that have been processed by the GPU and frees up the corresponding space in each page. I use DirectX 11 queries for detecting when a frame is complete and the ID3D11DeviceContext1::VS/PSSetConstantBuffers1 methods for binding constant buffers with an offset.
      The new allocator appears to be working but I am not 100% confident it is actually correct. In particular:
      1) it relies on queries which I am not too familiar with. Are they 100% reliable ?
      2) it maps/unmaps the constant buffer of each page at the beginning of a new frame and then writes the mapped memory as the frame is built. In pseudo code:
      BeginFrame:
          page.data = device.Map(page.buffer)
          device.Unmap(page.buffer)
      RenderFrame
          Alloc(size, initData)
              ...
              memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
          Alloc(size, initData)
              ...
              memcpy(page.data + page.start, initData, size)
      (Note: calling Unmap at the end of a frame prevents binding the mapped constant buffers and triggers an error in the debug layer)
      Is this valid ? 
      3) I don't fully understand how many frames I should keep in the history. My intuition says it should be equal to the maximum latency reported by IDXGIDevice1::GetMaximumFrameLatency, which is 3 on my machine. But, this value works fine in an unit test while on a more complex demo I need to manually set it to 5, otherwise the allocator starts overwriting previous frames that have not completed yet. Shouldn't the swap chain Present method block the CPU in this case ?
      4) Should I expect this approach to be more efficient than the one managed by the driver ? I don't have meaningful profile data yet.
      Is anybody familiar with the approach described above and can answer my questions and discuss the pros and cons of this technique based on his experience ? 
      For reference, I've uploaded the (WIP) allocator code at https://paste.ofcode.org/Bq98ujP6zaAuKyjv4X7HSv.  Feel free to adapt it in your engine and please let me know if you spot any mistakes
      Thanks
      Stefano Lanza
       
    • By Matt Barr
      Hey all. I've been working with compute shaders lately, and was hoping to build out some libraries to reuse code. As a prerequisite for my current project, I needed to sort a big array of data in my compute shader, so I was going to implement quicksort as a library function. My implementation was going to use an inout array to apply the changes to the referenced array.

      I spent half the day yesterday debugging in visual studio before I realized that the solution, while it worked INSIDE the function, reverted to the original state after returning from the function.

      My hack fix was just to inline the code, but this is not a great solution for the future.  Any ideas? I've considered just returning an array of ints that represents the sorted indices.
  • Popular Now