Sign in to follow this  
Conoktra

OpenGL OpenGL color interpolation not linear?

Recommended Posts

I have a rather simple problem that I am positive has a simple solution.  I am rendering a quad twice as two layers, each with a color.  The first is green, the second is red.  I am using the alpha channel of the color component for the quad's vertices to blend the two colors together across the quads.

 

Attached bellow are two images.  Image A is how it looks when rendered with OpenGL, image B is how it should look.  The black color in image A is the background bleeding through.  If OpenGL interpolated the color values linearly there would be no bleeding, it would be a nice transition from red to green and no black would show.  But that's obviously not the case.

 

I've tried using a GLSL program and setting the color variable to noperspective but it makes no difference.  Is there a way to force OpenGL to do plain linear interpolation of my vertex colors, so that the red and green blend evenly across the quad like in image B?

 

Additional information:

Red layer alpha values:
1.0 -------- 0.0
|             |
|             |
|             |
0.0 -------- 1.0

Green layer alpha values:
0.0 -------- 1.0
|              |
|              |
|              |
1.0 -------- 0.0

.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In 'a' your colours have completely faded out before even the half way point... Something is definitely wrong there -- I don't think this is a feature/design of GL.
Maybe post some more code/explanation of what you're doing?

Also, are you actually rendering a quad, or is it 2 triangles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the vertex colors at each of the 4 corners of the two quads?

What blend mode are you using?

Are you rendering to sRGB?

 

Off the wall initial guesses, likely one of these or a combination of the two, though some quick envelope math doesn't match up directly:

 

Gamma is getting misunderstood.

 

Your vertex colors are (1, 0, 0, 1), and (0, 0, 0, 0) for the red quad, (0, 1, 0, 1) and (0, 0, 0, 0) for the green quad, and you're using alpha blending, so your color ramps drop off faster than you would expect.

 

For diagnosing, I suggest trying vertex colors of (1, 0, 0, 1) and (1, 0, 0, 0) for red, (0, 1, 0, 1) and (0, 1, 0, 0) for green. Might also use additive blending instead of src/inv_src. Also try a simple vertical gradient, as both two composited quads, and as a single quad going from (1, 0, 0, 1) at the top to (0, 1, 0, 1) at the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help!

 


Also, are you actually rendering a quad, or is it 2 triangles?

It's being rendered as two triangles.  I've read that OpenGL uses the "Barycentric coordinate system" which might cause the issue as seen here.  But that individual was rendering in 2D, so he was able to bypass the problem by generating his texture coordinates from screen space (rather then interpolating them from the vertices).

 


Maybe post some more code/explanation of what you're doing?

Drawing two quads (one red and one green) that overlay and blend together to create a linear fade from red to green (as is seen in image B).  Somehow the interpolation of the color channel is non-linear, resulting in the background bleeding through as is seen in image A.  Code:

// Draw the red quad
glBegin(GL_TRIANGLES);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 0);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 0);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 1);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 0);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 0);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 1);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 1);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 1);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 1);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 0);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 0);
glColor4f(1, 0, 0, 0);

glEnd();

// Draw the green quad
glBegin(GL_TRIANGLES);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 0);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 1);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 1);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 1);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 0);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 0);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 1);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 0);

glVertex3f(1, 1, 1);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 1);

glVertex3f(0, 1, 0);
glColor4f(0, 1, 0, 1);

glEnd();


What are the vertex colors at each of the 4 corners of the two quads?
What blend mode are you using?
Are you rendering to sRGB?

See the above for vertex colors.  The blend mode is glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA). I am using sRGB. I am using Ogre3D so I can't verify that gamma correction isn't happening for sure.

 

I got Googling and added "fragColour.a = pow(outColour.a, 1.0 / 5.0);" to my shader rather then "fragColour.a = outColor.a;" and it seems to have done the trick!  Reading the OpenGL registry though says gamma correction shouldn't happen on alpha values for textures.  What about vertex colors?  That and a gamma factor of 5 is a lot bigger then the standard 2.2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


I got Googling and added "fragColour.a = pow(outColour.a, 1.0 / 5.0);" to my shader rather then "fragColour.a = outColor.a;" and it seems to have done the trick!  Reading the OpenGL registry though says gamma correction shouldn't happen on alpha values for textures.  What about vertex colors?  That and a gamma factor of 5 is a lot bigger then the standard 2.2.

IMHO there must be a problem elsewhere! First, fragment alpha is not needed at all when you use glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA). Let fragment's alpha be at 1. Second, alpha is never meaningfully targeted by gamma correction, neither in textures nor in vertices nor elsewhere.

 

How do you do the 2 steps w.r.t. the blend operation? it is done with glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) in both cases? If so, then it is clear that the background has an effect onto the result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be using glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE).

 

At a point where both of them are interpolated to 50% alpha, using SRC_ALPHA, ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, you will get 0.5 green, 0.25 red, 0.25 background, because you're doing this:

 

Output = 0.5 * Green + (1-0.5) * ( 0.5 * red + (1-0.5) * background );

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628395
    • Total Posts
      2982433
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now